- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Machine-learning-derived protocols for information-based work extraction from active particles

Grzegorz Szamel*

  • *Contact author: grzegorz.szamel@colostate.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 113, L033402 – Published 5 March, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ssll-gdgg

Abstract

We propose and analyze a process that extracts useful work from a single active particle maintained at constant temperature in a harmonic potential by measuring the relative sign of the self-propulsion and the confining force, and then adjusting the stiffness of the potential. First, we show analytically that useful work can be extracted by stepwise changes of the stiffness. Then, we use a machine learning procedure to find time-dependent stiffness change protocols. We find that these protocols involve discontinuous initial changes of the stiffness opposite to the expected direction, which resemble initial jumps analytically found by Garcia-Millan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 088301 (2025)] in a different information-based work extraction process. The learned protocols allow to extract significantly larger amounts of useful work. The work extracted exceeds that allowed by the conventional second law for feedback-controlled processes, which can be rationalized by the nonequilibrium character of the system considered.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. S. Ramaswamy, The mechanics and statistics of active matter, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  2. C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Löwen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
  3. S. Ramaswamy, Active matter, J. Stat. Mech. (2017) 054002.
  4. E. Fodor and M. C. Marchetti, The statistical physics of active matter: From self-catalytic colloids to living cells, Physica A 504, 106 (2018).
  5. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  6. J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Hydrodynamics and phases of flocks, Ann. Phys. 318, 170 (2005).
  7. A. Sokolov, M. M. Apodaca, B. A. Grzybowski, and I. S. Aranson, Swimming bacteria power microscopic gears, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 969 (2010).
  8. R. Di Leonardo, L. Angelani, D. Dell'Arciprete, G. Ruocco, V. Iebba, S. Schippa, M. P. Conte, F. Mecarini, F. De Angelis, and E. Di Fabrizio, Bacterial ratchet motors, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 9541 (2010).
  9. G. Vizsnyiczai, G. Frangipane, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, and R. Di Leonardo, Light controlled 3D micromotors powered by bacteria, Nat. Commun. 8, 15974 (2017).
  10. P. Pietzonka, E. Fodor, C. Lohrmann, M. E. Cates, and U. Seifert, Autonomous engines driven by active matter: Energetics and design principles, Phys. Rev. X 9, 041032 (2019).
  11. D. Martin, C. Nardini, M. E. Cates, and E. Fodor, Extracting maximum power from active colloidal heat engines, Europhys. Lett. 121, 60005 (2018).
  12. T. Ekeh, M. E. Cates, and E. Fodor, Thermodynamic cycles with active matter, Phys. Rev. E 102, 010101(R) (2020).
  13. G. Szamel, Single active particle engine utilizing a non-reciprocal coupling between particle's position and self-propulsion, Phys. Rev. E 102, 042605 (2020).
  14. E. Fodor and M. E. Cates, Active engines: Thermodynamics moves forward, Europhys. Lett. 134, 10003 (2021).
  15. T. Speck, Efficiency of isothermal active matter engines: Strong driving beats weak driving, Phys. Rev. E 105, L012601 (2022).
  16. L. Szilard, Uber die Entropieverminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingriffen intelligenter Wesen, Z. Phys. 53, 840 (1929); Behav. Sci. 9, 301 (1964) (English translation).
  17. J. M. R. Parrondo, J. M. Horowitz, and T. Sagawa, Thermodynamics of information, Nat. Phys. 11, 131 (2015).
  18. P. Malgaretti and H. Stark, Szilard engines and information-based work extraction for active systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 228005 (2022).
  19. L. Cocconi, J. Knight, and C. Roberts, Optimal power extraction from active particles with hidden states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 188301 (2023).
  20. R. Garcia-Millan, J. Schüttler, M. E. Cates, and S. A. M. Loos, Optimal closed-loop control of active particles and a minimal information engine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 088301 (2025).
  21. J. Schüttler, R. Garcia-Millan, M. E. Cates, and S. A. M. Loos, Active particles in moving traps: Minimum work protocols and information efficiency of work extraction, Phys. Rev. E 112, 024119 (2025).
  22. T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, Optimal finite-time processes in stochastic thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 108301 (2007).
  23. S. Whitelam, Demon in the machine: learning to extract work and absorb entropy from fluctuating nanosystems, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021005 (2023).
  24. C. Casert and S. Whitelam, Learning protocols for the fast and efficient control of active matter, Nat. Commun. 15, 9218 (2024).
  25. G. Szamel, A self-propelled particle in an external potential: Existence of an effective temperature, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012111 (2014).
  26. C. Maggi, U. M. B. Marconi, N. Gnan, and R. Di Leonardo, Multidimensional stationary probability distribution for interacting active particles, Sci. Rep. 5, 10742 (2015).
  27. C. Sandford, A. Y. Grosberg, and J.-F. Joanny, Pressure and flow of exponentially self-correlated active particles, Phys. Rev. E 96, 052605 (2017).
  28. D. Martin, J. O'Byrne, M. E. Cates, E. Fodor, C. Nardini, J. Tailleur, and F. van Wijland, Statistical mechanics of active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck particles, Phys. Rev. E 103, 032607 (2021).
  29. B. ten Hagen, S. van Teeffelen, and H. Löwen, Brownian motion of a self-propelled particle, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 23, 194119 (2011).
  30. Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with No alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012).
  31. K. Sekimoto, Langevin equation and thermodynamics, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 130, 17 (1998).
  32. U. Seifert, Stochastic thermodynamics, fluctuation theorems and molecular machines, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012).
  33. A. G. Frim and M. R. DeWeese, Optimal finite-time Brownian Carnot engine, Phys. Rev. E 105, L052103 (2022).
  34. M. Chatterjee, V. Holubec, and R. Marathe, Optimal constrained control for generally damped Brownian heat engines, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 58, 245001 (2025).
  35. J. Howse, R. A. L. Jones, A. J. Ryan, T. Gough, R. Vafabakhsh, and R. Golestanian, Self-motile colloidal particles: from directed propulsion to random walk, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 048102 (2007).
  36. J. Palacci, C. Cottin-Bizonne, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Sedimentation and effective temperature of active colloidal suspensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 088304 (2010).
  37. G. Szamel, Machine-learning-derived protocols for information-based work extraction from active particles, figshare, Dataset (2025), https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.30525977.v1.
  38. W. H. Press, S. A. Teukolsky, W. T. Vetterling, and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, New York, 1992).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 113, L033402– Published 5 March, 2026
  • Received 3 November 2025
  • Accepted 11 February 2026
Article part of CHORUS
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation