Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Electric response of multiarm protein crystals

D. Ray1,2, F. Platten1,3, and K. Kang1,*

  • *Contact author: k.kang@fz-juelich.de

Phys. Rev. E 113, 014403 – Published 22 January, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/ql7f-wzpr

Abstract

Electric fields can modify protein-protein interactions and thereby influence phase behavior. In lysozyme–sodium thiocyanate solutions, we recently observed shifts in both the crystallization boundary and the liquid-liquid phase separation line under a weak applied field, along with a range of distinct crystal morphologies. Here, we explore how forming protein crystals respond to variations in field frequency and amplitude, focusing on the morphologies of complex, multiarm structures. At constant protein and salt concentrations, the applied field governs both the number and the angular distribution of crystal arms. These features are analyzed through Fourier analysis of microscopy images, revealing cooperative angular ordering among the arms. Based on these observations, we classify three principal multiarm protein crystal (pX) morphologies: flowerlike pX (dominant at high field strengths), triconic pX (appearing nonmonotonically at lower fields), and conic pX (widely observed under low-field conditions). Near the crystallization boundary, field-driven metastable structures such as tubules, clusters, nematic domains, and fibers also occur in response to the field. These findings demonstrate that electric fields effectively steer protein crystallization pathways and provide insight into the mechanisms of various multiarm crystallization.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (46)

  1. A. Stradner and P. Schurtenberger, Soft Matter 16, 307 (2020).
  2. R. Mezzenga and P. Fischer, Rep. Prog. Phys. 76, 046601 (2013).
  3. J. J. McManus, P. Charbonneau, E. Zaccarelli, and N. Asherie, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 22, 73 (2016).
  4. C. R. Berland, G. M. Thurston, M. Kondo, M. L. Broide, J. Pande, O. Ogun, and G. B. Benedek, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89, 1214 (1992).
  5. A. C. Dumetz, et al., Biophys. J. 94, 570 (2008).
  6. A. Stradner, G. M. Thurston, and P. Schurtenberger, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, S2805 (2005).
  7. O. Galkin and P. G. Vekilov, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 6277 (2000).
  8. F. Platten, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 142, 174905 (2015).
  9. J. Hansen, et al., J. Chem. Phys. 158, 024904 (2023).
  10. S. Tanaka, M. Ataka, and K. Ito, Phys. Rev. E 65, 051804 (2002).
  11. J. Hansen, S. U. Egelhaaf, and F. Platten, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 25, 3031 (2023).
  12. M. Muschol and F. Rosenberger, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10424 (1995).
  13. A. S. Parmar and M. Muschol, Biophys. J. 97, P590 (2009).
  14. J. Hansen, F. Platten, D. Wagner, and S. U. Egelhaaf, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 18, 10270 (2016).
  15. O. Matsarskaia, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20, 27214 (2018).
  16. J. Hansen, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 22384 (2021).
  17. M. Madani, T. Hamacher, and F. Platten, Soft Matter 21, 1937 (2025).
  18. T. Hamacher and F. Platten, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 27, 16558 (2025).
  19. A. Salis, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 14, 4343 (2012).
  20. F. Roosen-Runge, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 5777 (2013).
  21. F. Roosen-Runge, et al., Sci. Rep. 4, 7016 (2014).
  22. F. Sterpone, et al., J. Mol. Biol. 311, 409 (2001).
  23. M. Gerstein and C. Chothia, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93, 10167 (1996).
  24. H. I. Okur, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 1997 (2017).
  25. K. D. Collins, Methods 34, 300 (2004).
  26. M. M. Ries-Kautt and A. F. Ducruix, J. Biol. Chem. 264, 745 (1989).
  27. M. Boström, D. R. M. Williams, and B. W. Ninham, Biophys. J. 85, 686 (2003).
  28. Y. Zhang and P. S. Cremer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 15249 (2009).
  29. F. Evers, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 8462 (2009).
  30. A. Salis, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 111, 1149 (2007).
  31. C. Duan and R. Wang, ACS Cent. Sci. 10, 460 (2024).
  32. D. Ray, et al., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 15, 8108 (2024).
  33. D. Ray, et al., Soft Matter 21, 3012 (2025).
  34. K. Kang and F. Platten, Sci. Rep. 12, 3061 (2022).
  35. M. Taleb, et al., J. Cryst. Growth 232, 250 (2001).
  36. Z. Hammadi, et al., Cryst. Growth Des. 7, 1472 (2007).
  37. C. N. Nanev and A. Penkova, J. Cryst. Growth 232, 285 (2001).
  38. C. N. Nanev, Crystals 7, 310 (2017).
  39. F. Platten, et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 14986 (2015).
  40. J. K. G. Dhont and K. Kang, Eur. Phys. J. E 33, 51 (2010).
  41. K. Kang and J. K. G. Dhont, Soft Matter 6, 273 (2010).
  42. A. Onuki, Eur. Phys. J. E 47, 3 (2024).
  43. L. Hentschel, et al., Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23, 2686 (2021).
  44. K. Kang, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 053903 (2011).
  45. B. Matthews, Acta. Crystallogr. 20, 230 (1966).
  46. H. Fröhlich, Theory of Dielectrics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1958).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation