Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Critical scaling and supercritical coarsening in active model B+

Abir Bhowmick1,* and P. K. Mohanty1,2,†

  • *Contact author: ab23rs019@iiserkol.ac.in
  • Contact author: pkmohanty@iiserkol.ac.in

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024134 – Published 17 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/qktx-n35r

Abstract

We study critical dynamics and phase-ordering kinetics in active model B (AMB) and its minimal extension, active model B+ (AMB+), using deterministic simulations in two dimensions. At criticality rc=0, both models display identical mean-field scaling despite nonequilibrium currents, with order-parameter decay with time as m(t)tα, with α=14, and the dynamical exponent being z=4. A generalized equal-area construction yields the binodal densities and phase diagram of AMB+. For supercritical quenches, domain size grows as L(t)t1/3(1+c/lnt), revealing logarithmic corrections to the classic t1/3 growth law; moreover, it is consistent with the functional renormalization group predictions for marginal activity in d=2. The logarithmic corrections are clearly evident in both AMB and AMB+ in the macrophase-separated regime. However, in AMB+, domain growth is arrested in the parameter regime where the active current opposes the formation of macroscopic clusters, leading to long-lived microphase-separated states.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (60)

  1. S. Ramaswamy, Active matter, J. Stat. Mech. (2017) 054002.
  2. M. C. Marchetti, J. F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Hydrodynamics of soft active matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1143 (2013).
  3. Y. Katz, K. Tunstrøm, C. C. Ioannou, C. Huepe, and I. D. Couzin, Inferring the structure and dynamics of interactions in schooling fish, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 18720 (2011).
  4. M. Ballerini, N. Cabibbo, R. Candelier, A. Cavagna, E. Cisbani, I. Giardina, V. Lecomte, A. Orlandi, G. Parisi, A. Procaccini, M. Viale, and V. Zdravkovic, Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: Evidence from a field study, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232 (2008).
  5. M. C. Marchetti, Y. Fily, S. Henkes, A. Patch, and D. Yllanes, Minimal model of active colloids highlights the role of mechanical interactions in controlling the emergent behavior of active matter, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 21, 34 (2016).
  6. T. F. F. Farage, P. Krinninger, and J. M. Brader, Effective interactions in active Brownian suspensions, Phys. Rev. E 91, 042310 (2015).
  7. B. Liebchen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Phoretic interactions generically induce dynamic clusters and wave patterns in active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 268001 (2017).
  8. P. Illien, R. Golestanian, and A. Sen, ‘Fuelled’ motion: phoretic motility and collective behaviour of active colloids, Chem. Soc. Rev. 46, 5508 (2017).
  9. M. N. van der Linden, L. C. Alexander, D. G. A. L. Aarts, and O. Dauchot, Interrupted motility induced phase separation in aligning active colloids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 098001 (2019).
  10. A. Zöttl and H. Stark, Modeling active colloids: From active Brownian particles to hydrodynamic and chemical fields, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 14, 109 (2023).
  11. J. Melio, S. Riedel, A. Azadbakht, S. A. Caipa Cure, T. M. Evers, M. Babaei, A. Mashaghi, J. de Graaf, and D. J. Kraft, The motion of catalytically active colloids approaching a surface, Soft Matter 21, 2541 (2025).
  12. P. M. Bendix, G. H. Koenderink, D. Cuvelier, Z. Dogic, B. N. Koeleman, W. M. Brieher, C. M. Field, L. Mahadevan, and D. A. Weitz, A quantitative analysis of contractility in active cytoskeletal protein networks, Biophys. J. 94, 3126 (2008).
  13. T. Sanchez, D. T. N. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Spontaneous motion in hierarchically assembled active matter, Nature (London) 491, 431 (2012).
  14. J. Alvarado, M. Sheinman, A. Sharma, F. C. MacKintosh, and G. H. Koenderink, Molecular motors robustly drive active gels to a critically connected state, Nat. Phys. 9, 591 (2013).
  15. Z. M. Geisterfer, G. Guilloux, J. C. Gatlin, and R. Gibeaux, The cytoskeleton and its roles in self-organization phenomena: Insights from Xenopus egg extracts, Cells 10, 2197 (2021).
  16. F. Jülicher, A. Ajdari, and J. Prost, Modeling molecular motors, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1269 (1997).
  17. F. J. Ndlec, T. Surrey, A. C. Maggs, and S. Leibler, Self-organization of microtubules and motors, Nature (London) 389, 305 (1997).
  18. K. Kruse, J. F. Joanny, F. Jülicher, J. Prost, and K. Sekimoto, Asters, vortices, and rotating spirals in active gels of polar filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 078101 (2004).
  19. T. B. Liverpool and M. C. Marchetti, Instabilities of isotropic solutions of active polar filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 138102 (2003).
  20. T. B. Liverpool and M. C. Marchetti, Hydrodynamics and rheology of active polar filaments, in Cell Motility, edited by P. Lenz (Springer, New York, 2008), pp. 177–206.
  21. V. Schaller, C. Weber, C. Semmrich, E. Frey, and A. R. Bausch, Polar patterns of driven filaments, Nature (London) 467, 73 (2010).
  22. J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Statistical mechanics of interacting run-and-tumble bacteria, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 218103 (2008).
  23. M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 219 (2015).
  24. Y. Fily and M. C. Marchetti, Athermal phase separation of self-propelled particles with no alignment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 235702 (2012).
  25. G. S. Redner, M. F. Hagan, and A. Baskaran, Structure and dynamics of a phase-separating active colloidal fluid, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 055701 (2013).
  26. J. Stenhammar, A. Tiribocchi, R. J. Allen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Continuum theory of phase separation kinetics for active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 145702 (2013).
  27. J. Stenhammar, D. Marenduzzo, R. J. Allen, and M. E. Cates, Phase behaviour of active Brownian particles: The role of dimensionality, Soft Matter 10, 1489 (2014).
  28. A. Bhowmick, S. Mitra, and P. K. Mohanty, Geometric and nonequilibrium criticality in run-and-tumble particles with competing motility and attraction, Phys. Rev. E 112, 044129 (2025).
  29. I. Buttinoni, J. Bialké, F. Kümmel, H. Löwen, C. Bechinger, and T. Speck, Dynamical clustering and phase separation in suspensions of self-propelled colloidal particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 238301 (2013).
  30. G. Liu, A. Patch, F. Bahar, D. Yllanes, R. D. Welch, M. C. Marchetti, S. Thutupalli, and J. W. Shaevitz, Self-driven phase transitions drive Myxococcus xanthus fruiting body formation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 248102 (2019).
  31. M. R. Shaebani, A. Wysocki, R. G. Winkler, G. Gompper, and H. Rieger, Computational models for active matter, Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 181 (2020).
  32. A. P. Solon, M. E. Cates, and J. Tailleur, Active Brownian particles and run-and-tumble particles: A comparative study, Eur. Phys. J.: Spec. Top. 224, 1231 (2015).
  33. T. Speck, J. Bialké, A. M. Menzel, and H. Löwen, Effective Cahn-Hilliard equation for the phase separation of active Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 218304 (2014).
  34. C. Nardini, É. Fodor, E. Tjhung, F. van Wijland, J. Tailleur, and M. E. Cates, Entropy production in field theories without time-reversal symmetry: Quantifying the non-equilibrium character of active matter, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021007 (2017).
  35. J. W. Cahn and J. E. Hilliard, Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy, J. Chem. Phys. 28, 258 (1958).
  36. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).
  37. A. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
  38. I. Theurkauff, C. Cottin-Bizonne, J. Palacci, C. Ybert, and L. Bocquet, Dynamic clustering in active colloidal suspensions with chemical signaling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 268303 (2012).
  39. R. Wittkowski, A. Tiribocchi, J. Stenhammar, R. J. Allen, D. Marenduzzo, and M. E. Cates, Scalar ϕ4 field theory for active-particle phase separation, Nat. Commun. 5, 4351 (2014).
  40. E. Tjhung, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, Cluster phases and bubbly phase separation in active fluids: Reversal of the Ostwald process, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031080 (2018).
  41. G. Fejős, Z. Szép, and N. Yamamoto, Scaling behaviors in active model B+ via the functional renormalization group, Phys. Rev. E 113, 014130 (2026).
  42. M. Kardar, Statistical Physics of Fields (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007).
  43. N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2018).
  44. A. P. Solon, J. Stenhammar, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Generalized thermodynamics of phase equilibria in scalar active matter, Phys. Rev. E 97, 020602(R) (2018).
  45. U. C. Täuber, Critical Dynamics: A Field Theory Approach to Equilibrium and Non-Equilibrium Scaling Behavior (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
  46. H. E. Stanley, Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1971).
  47. J. Cardy, Scaling and Renormalization in Statistical Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996).
  48. Finite Size Scaling and Numerical Simulation of Statistical Systems, edited by V. Privman (World Scientific, Singapore, 1990).
  49. P. M. Chaikin and T. C. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  50. C. G. Ray, I. Mukherjee, and P. K. Mohanty, How motility affects Ising transitions, J. Stat. Mech. (2024) 093207.
  51. D. P. Landau and K. Binder, A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulations in Statistical Physics, 4th ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2014).
  52. B. Partridge and C. F. Lee, Critical motility-induced phase separation belongs to the Ising universality class, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 068002 (2019).
  53. A. P. Solon, J. Stenhammar, M. E. Cates, Y. Kafri, and J. Tailleur, Generalized thermodynamics of motility-induced phase separation: Phase equilibria, Laplace pressure, and change of ensembles, New J. Phys. 20, 075001 (2018).
  54. K. Wilson, The renormalization group and the ε expansion, Phys. Rep. 12, 75 (1974).
  55. J. M. Kosterlitz and D. J. Thouless, Ordering, metastability and phase transitions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 6, 1181 (1973).
  56. A. J. Bray, Theory of phase-ordering kinetics, Adv. Phys. 51, 481 (2002).
  57. M. E. Cates and E. Tjhung, Theories of binary fluid mixtures: From phase-separation kinetics to active emulsions, J. Fluid Mech. 836, P1 (2018).
  58. F. Caballero, C. Nardini, and M. E. Cates, From bulk to microphase separation in scalar active matter: A perturbative renormalization group analysis, J. Stat. Mech. (2018) 123208.
  59. S. Pattanayak, S. Mishra, and S. Puri, Ordering kinetics in the active model B, Phys. Rev. E 104, 014606 (2021).
  60. P. K. Yadav, S. Mishra, and S. Puri, Coarsening kinetics in active model B+: Macroscale and microscale phase separation, Phys. Rev. E 112, 035412 (2025).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation