- Access by Xinjiang University
Structure of higher-order interactions controls oscillation death and multistability in excitable networks
Phys. Rev. E 114, 054212 – Published 10 November, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/n8xm-bm44
Abstract
We study coupled FitzHugh-Nagumo oscillators on a small-world network in which the activator and the inhibitor diffuse through independent channels, with an added three-body coupling whose structure is varied among an all-to-all form, a simplicial complex built on the network triangles, and a random hypergraph. At fixed coupling strength and a fixed number of three-body interactions, the structure decides whether multistability and coexisting oscillatory-quiescent states survive. With matched triple count on the same backbone, the simplicial complex retains most of its partial-quenching basin whereas the random hypergraph removes nearly all of it, a separation far larger than the variation across network realizations, while total death falls comparably under both. The difference is not set by the spectrum of the normalized higher-order Laplacian, whose leading eigenvalue the normalization forces to be the same for both structures, but by the alignment of that operator with the pairwise eigenbasis: simplicial triples join adjacent nodes and leave long-wavelength perturbations almost undamped, whereas random triples damp them as strongly as short ones. Randomizing this alignment at fixed spectrum moves the transverse stability of synchrony under the simplicial complex onto that under the hypergraph. Sampling the attraction basins shows that the total-death basin shrinks under both structures, but only under the simplicial complex does the partial-quenching basin grow, and the quiescent domains of these mixed states are long-wavelength patterns. An all-to-all three-body control acts approximately as a pairwise mean field whose strength is reduced by an amplitude gate, set by the cycle-averaged squared activator of the collective oscillation.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (49)
- A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
- S. H. Strogatz, From Kuramoto to Crawford: Exploring the onset of synchronization in populations of coupled oscillators, Physica D 143, 1 (2000).
- Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
- S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Complex networks: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 424, 175 (2006).
- A. Arenas, A. Díaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in complex networks, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008).
- R. FitzHugh, Impulses and physiological states in theoretical models of nerve membrane, Biophys. J. 1, 445 (1961); J. Nagumo, S. Arimoto, and S. Yoshizawa, An active pulse transmission line simulating nerve axon, Proc. IRE, 50, 2061 (1962).
- L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Master stability functions for synchronized coupled systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2109 (1998).
- A. Koseska, E. Volkov, and J. Kurths, Oscillation quenching mechanisms: Amplitude vs. oscillation death, Phys. Rep. 531, 173 (2013).
- G. Saxena, A. Prasad, and R. Ramaswamy, Amplitude death: The emergence of stationarity in coupled nonlinear systems, Phys. Rep. 521, 205 (2012).
- D. V. R. Reddy, A. Sen, and G. L. Johnston, Time delay induced death in coupled limit cycle oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5109 (1998).
- P. C. Matthews and S. H. Strogatz, Phase diagram for the collective behavior of limit-cycle oscillators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1701 (1990).
- P. B. Gogoi, S. Kumarasamy, A. Prasad, and R. Ramaswamy, Transition from inhomogeneous limit cycles to oscillation death in nonlinear oscillators with similarity-dependent coupling, Chaos 32, 113138 (2022).
- A. Koseska, E. Volkov, and J. Kurths, Transition from amplitude to oscillation death via Turing bifurcation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 024103 (2013).
- A. M. Turing, The chemical basis of morphogenesis, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 237, 37 (1952).
- A. Zakharova, M. Kapeller, and E. Schöll, Chimera death: Symmetry breaking in dynamical networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 154101 (2014).
- E. Schöll, Synchronization patterns and chimera states in complex networks: Interplay of topology and dynamics, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 225, 891 (2016).
- H. Daido and K. Nakanishi, Aging transition and universal scaling in oscillator networks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 104101 (2004).
- G. Tanaka, K. Morino, and K. Aihara, Dynamical robustness in complex networks: The crucial role of low-degree nodes, Sci. Rep. 2, 232 (2012).
- S. Majhi, B. Rakshit, A. Sharma, J. Kurths, and D. Ghosh, Dynamical robustness of network of oscillators, Phys. Rep. 1082, 1 (2024).
- B. Rakshit, N. Rajendrakumar, and B. Balaram, Abnormal route to aging transition in a network of coupled oscillators, Chaos 30, 101101 (2020).
- A. Sharma, K. Suresh, K. Thamilmaran, A. Prasad, and M. D. Shrimali, Effect of parameter mismatch and time delay interaction on density-induced amplitude death in coupled nonlinear oscillators, Nonlinear Dyn. 76, 1797 (2014).
- P. R. Sharma, N. K. Kamal, U. K. Verma, K. Suresh, K. Thamilmaran, and M. D. Shrimali, Suppression and revival of oscillation in indirectly coupled limit cycle oscillators, Phys. Lett. A 380, 3178 (2016).
- K. Suresh, M. D. Shrimali, A. Prasad, and K. Thamilmaran, Experimental evidence for amplitude death induced by a time-varying interaction, Phys. Lett. A 378, 2845 (2014).
- K. Suresh, S. Sabarathinam, K. Thamilmaran, J. Kurths, and S. K. Dana, A common lag scenario in quenching of oscillation in coupled oscillators, Chaos 26, 083104 (2016).
- H. Nakao and A. S. Mikhailov, Turing patterns in network-organized activator–inhibitor systems, Nat. Phys. 6, 544 (2010).
- F. Battiston, G. Cencetti, I. Iacopini, V. Latora, M. Lucas, A. Patania, J.-G. Young, and G. Petri, Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics, Phys. Rep. 874, 1 (2020).
- F. Battiston, E. Amico, A. Barrat, G. Bianconi, G. Ferraz de Arruda, B. Franceschiello, I. Iacopini, S. Kéfi, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. M. Murray, T. P. Peixoto, F. Vaccarino, and G. Petri, The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systems, Nat. Phys. 17, 1093 (2021).
- C. Bick, E. Gross, H. A. Harrington, and M. T. Schaub, What are higher-order networks? SIAM Rev. 65, 686 (2023).
- S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, Dynamics on higher-order networks: A review, J. R. Soc. Interface 19, 20220043 (2022).
- M. Lucas, G. Cencetti, and F. Battiston, Multiorder Laplacian for synchronization in higher-order networks, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033410 (2020).
- P. S. Skardal and A. Arenas, Abrupt desynchronization and extensive multistability in globally coupled oscillator simplexes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 248301 (2019).
- A. P. Millán, J. J. Torres, and G. Bianconi, Explosive higher-order Kuramoto dynamics on simplicial complexes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 218301 (2020).
- M. Ramasamy, S. Devarajan, S. Kumarasamy, K. Rajagopal, Effect of higher-order interactions on synchronization of neuron models with electromagnetic induction, Appl. Math. Comput. 434, 127447 (2022).
- I. Iacopini, G. Petri, A. Barrat, and V. Latora, Simplicial models of social contagion, Nat. Commun. 10, 2485 (2019).
- R. Mulas, C. Kuehn, and J. Jost, Coupled dynamics on hypergraphs: Master stability of steady states and synchronization, Phys. Rev. E 101, 062313 (2020).
- Y. Zhang, M. Lucas, and F. Battiston, Higher-order interactions shape collective dynamics differently in hypergraphs and simplicial complexes, Nat. Commun. 14, 1605 (2023).
- L. V. Gambuzza, F. Di Patti, L. Gallo, S. Lepri, M. Romance, R. Criado, M. Frasca, V. Latora, and S. Boccaletti, Stability of synchronization in simplicial complexes, Nat. Commun. 12, 1255 (2021).
- M. Ramasamy, S. Kumarasamy, A. Srinivasan, P. Subburam, and K. Rajagopal, Dynamical effects of hypergraph links in a network of fractional-order complex systems Chaos 32, 123128 (2022).
- N. Zhao and X. Zhang, Impact of higher-order interactions on amplitude death of coupled oscillators, Physica A 622, 128803 (2023).
- R. Ghosh, U. K. Verma, S. Jalan, and M. D. Shrimali, First-order transition to oscillation death in coupled oscillators with higher-order interactions, Phys. Rev. E 108, 044207 (2023).
- A. N. Pisarchik and U. Feudel, Control of multistability, Phys. Rep. 540, 167 (2014).
- S. Kraut and U. Feudel, Multistability, noise, and attractor hopping: The crucial role of chaotic saddles, Phys. Rev. E 66, 015207(R) (2002).
- B. R. R. Boaretto, R. C. Budzinski, K. L. Rossi, C. Manchein, T. L. Prado, U. Feudel, and S. R. Lopes, Bistability in the synchronization of identical neurons, Phys. Rev. E 104, 024204 (2021).
- D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks, Nature (London) 393, 440 (1998).
- C. Tsitouras, Runge–Kutta pairs of order 5(4) satisfying only the first column simplifying assumption, Comput. Math. Appl. 62, 770 (2011).
- P. J. Menck, J. Heitzig, N. Marwan, and J. Kurths, How basin stability complements the linear-stability paradigm, Nat. Phys. 9, 89 (2013).
- Y. Zhang, P. S. Skardal, F. Battiston, G. Petri, and M. Lucas, Deeper but smaller: Higher-order interactions increase linear stability but shrink basins, Sci. Adv. 10, eado8049 (2024).
- X. Wang, D. Yu, T. Li, X. Li, Y. Xie, and Y. Jia, Stability of twisted states: The role of phase lag, pairwise and higher-order interactions, Phys. Rev. E 112, 024202 (2025).
- X. Wang, D. Yu, Y. Xie, X. Li, Z. Ye, and Y. Jia, Dual role of higher-order interactions in the stability of twisted states in high-harmonic Kuramoto-Sakaguchi models, Chaos Solitons Fractals 208, 118263 (2026).