- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Effects of cell-cell communication on bacterial chemotaxis
Phys. Rev. E 113, 054415 – Published 26 May, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/jgm1-2lcd
Abstract
Bacteria track chemical gradients using a biased random walk, a process called chemotaxis. Experiments suggest that bacteria also communicate during this process. Using a mathematical model, we find that sufficiently strong communication succeeds in keeping a population of bacteria together but slows down chemotaxis. However, if the secretion of the communication molecule is coupled to the detection of the external chemoattractant, chemotaxis can be faster than without communication. This result assumes that cells can detect and subtract the average of the chemoattractant over the population, a mechanism we term adaptive communication. Intriguingly, in this regime we predict that, even though blocking the communication receptors should slow down chemotaxis, overexpressing them should also slow it down, and partially blocking or underexpressing them may actually speed it up. Our work provides physical insights on how communication and chemotaxis are connected and may help explain why chemotaxing bacteria communicate.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (39)
- J. Su, Y. Song, Z. Zhu, X. Huang, J. Fan, J. Qiao, and F. Mao, Cell–cell communication: New insights and clinical implications, Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 9, 196 (2024).
- S. Fancher and A. Mugler, Fundamental limits to collective concentration sensing in cell populations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 078101 (2017).
- S. Mukherjee and B. L. Bassler, Bacterial quorum sensing in complex and dynamically changing environments, Nature Rev. Microbiol. 17, 371 (2019).
- Y. Huang, Y. Chen, and L.-h. Zhang, The roles of microbial cell-cell chemical communication systems in the modulation of antimicrobial resistance, Antibiotics 9, 779 (2020).
- A. Dominiak, B. Chełstowska, W. Olejarz, and G. Nowicka, Communication in the cancer microenvironment as a target for therapeutic interventions, Cancers 12, 1232 (2020).
- S. F. Gilbert, Developmental Biology, 10th ed. (Sinauer, Sunderland, 2014).
- A. Aman and T. Piotrowski, Cell migration during morphogenesis, Dev. Biol. 341, 20 (2010).
- K. J. Cheung and S. Horne-Badovinac, Collective migration modes in development, tissue repair and cancer, Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 26 741 (2025).
- A. D. Luster, R. Alon, and U. H. von Andrian, Immune cell migration in inflammation: Present and future therapeutic targets, Nature Immunol. 6, 1182 (2005).
- C. H. Stuelten, C. A. Parent, and D. J. Montell, Cell motility in cancer invasion and metastasis: Insights from simple model organisms, Nature Rev. Cancer 18, 296 (2018).
- N. Wadhwa and H. C. Berg, Bacterial motility: Machinery and mechanisms, Nature Rev. Microbiol. 20, 161 (2022).
- Y. Tu, Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: Signal amplification and accurate adaptation, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 42, 337 (2013).
- E. B. Jacob, I. Becker, Y. Shapira, and H. Levine, Bacterial linguistic communication and social intelligence, Trends Microbiol. 12, 366 (2004).
- E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Complex patterns formed by motile cells of Escherichia coli, Nature (London) 349, 630 (1991).
- S. Park, P. M. Wolanin, E. A. Yuzbashyan, P. Silberzan, J. B. Stock, and R. H. Austin, Motion to form a quorum, Science 301, 188 (2003).
- S. Park, P. M. Wolanin, E. A. Yuzbashyan, H. Lin, N. C. Darnton, J. B. Stock, P. Silberzan, and R. Austin, Influence of topology on bacterial social interaction, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 13910 (2003).
- Z. Long, B. Quaife, H. Salman, and Z. N. Oltvai, Cell-cell communication enhances bacterial chemotaxis toward external attractants, Sci. Rep. 7, 12855 (2017).
- E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Traveling bands of chemotactic bacteria: A theoretical analysis, J. Theor. Biol. 30, 235 (1971).
- E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability, J. Theor. Biol. 26, 399 (1970).
- M. J. Tindall, P. K. Maini, S. L. Porter, and J. P. Armitage, Overview of mathematical approaches used to model bacterial chemotaxis II: Bacterial populations, Bull. Math. Biol. 70, 1570 (2008).
- H. Salman, A. Zilman, C. Loverdo, M. Jeffroy, and A. Libchaber, Solitary modes of bacterial culture in a temperature gradient, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 118101 (2006).
- K. J. Painter, Mathematical models for chemotaxis and their applications in self-organisation phenomena, J. Theor. Biol. 481, 162 (2019).
- M. D. Lazova, T. Ahmed, D. Bellomo, R. Stocker, and T. S. Shimizu, Response rescaling in bacterial chemotaxis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, 13870 (2011).
- O. Wartlick, A. Kicheva, and M. González-Gaitán, Morphogen gradient formation, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 1, a001255 (2009).
- S. Saha and A. Mugler, Code for “Effects of cell-cell communication on bacterial chemotaxis”. Zenodo (2025), doi:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17868091
- G. Young, M. Demir, H. Salman, G. B. Ermentrout, and J. E. Rubin, Interactions of solitary pulses of E. coli in a one-dimensional nutrient gradient, Physica D 395, 24 (2019).
- M. Tang, M. Wang, C. Shi, P. A. Iglesias, P. N. Devreotes, and C.-H. Huang, Evolutionarily conserved coupling of adaptive and excitable networks mediates eukaryotic chemotaxis, Nat. Commun. 5, 5175 (2014).
- K. Takeda, D. Shao, M. Adler, P. G. Charest, W. F. Loomis, H. Levine, A. Groisman, W.-J. Rappel, and R. A. Firtel, Incoherent feedforward control governs adaptation of activated Ras in a eukaryotic chemotaxis pathway, Sci. Signaling 5, ra2 (2012).
- A. Mugler, A. Levchenko, and I. Nemenman, Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial communication and temporal integration, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E689 (2016).
- B. A. Camley, J. Zimmermann, H. Levine, and W.-J. Rappel, Collective signal processing in cluster chemotaxis: Roles of adaptation, amplification, and coattraction in collective guidance, PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1005008 (2016).
- D. Ellison, A. Mugler, M. D. Brennan, S. H. Lee, R. J. Huebner, E. R. Shamir, L. A. Woo, J. Kim, P. Amar, I. Nemenman, et al., Cell–cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E679 (2016).
- L. González and A. Mugler, Collective effects in flow-driven cell migration, Phys. Rev. E 108, 054406 (2023).
- J. Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria: Motile Escherichia coli migrate in bands that are influenced by oxygen and organic nutrients, Science 153, 708 (1966).
- T. V. Phan, H. H. Mattingly, L. Vo, J. S. Marvin, L. L. Looger, and T. Emonet, Direct measurement of dynamic attractant gradients reveals breakdown of the Patlak–Keller–Segel chemotaxis model, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 121, e2309251121 (2024).
- A. V. Narla, J. Cremer, and T. Hwa, A traveling-wave solution for bacterial chemotaxis with growth, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2105138118 (2021).
- A. J. Waite, N. W. Frankel, and T. Emonet, Behavioral variability and phenotypic diversity in bacterial chemotaxis, Annu. Rev. Biophys. 47, 595 (2018).
- B. A. Camley, Collective gradient sensing and chemotaxis: Modeling and recent developments, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 30, 223001 (2018).
- H. C. Berg, Random Walks in Biology (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2025).
- M. Grognot and K. M. Taute, A multiscale 3D chemotaxis assay reveals bacterial navigation mechanisms, Commun. Biol. 4, 669 (2021).