Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Statistical analysis of speckle fields

Ian D. Min-Roberts* and Wojciech Rozmus

Pierre A. Michel

  • *Contact author: minrober@ualberta.ca

Phys. Rev. E 114, 045202 – Published 2 October, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/dbsb-8lpt

Abstract

Speckles, or laser hot spots, are the intensity maxima of optically smoothed laser beams that seed instabilities, making a quantitative statistical description of speckles of interest. Earlier statistical theories estimated the number of speckles above an intensity level set for optically smoothed beams produced by random phase plates, using an ansatz that relates intensity maxima to the maxima of the real and imaginary components of the underlying complex Gaussian electric field. Here, we count speckles directly from the laser intensity field, treating it as a χ22 random field and imposing the local maximum conditions without a single-component ansatz. We evaluate the theory for square, circular, annular, and Gaussian aperture spectra, and include induced spatial incoherence as a temporal smoothing mechanism. Monte Carlo simulations confirm the theory and show improved accuracy relative to the earlier ansatz-based formulation. Applications include a simple stimulated Brillouin scattering reflectivity model using the resulting speckle statistics, and a comparison between speckle-driven and thermal noise density-fluctuation spectra.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. Y. Kato, K. Mima, N. Miyanaga, S. Arinaga, Y. Kitagawa, M. Nakatsuka, and C. Yamanaka, Random phasing of high-power lasers for uniform target acceleration and plasma-instability suppression, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1057 (1984).
  2. R. Lehmberg, A. Schmitt, and S. Bodner, Theory of induced spatial incoherence, J. Appl. Phys. 62, 2680 (1987).
  3. S. Skupsky, R. Short, T. Kessler, R. Craxton, S. Letzring, and J. Soures, Improved laser-beam uniformity using the angular dispersion of frequency-modulated light, J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3456 (1989).
  4. P. Michel, Introduction to Laser-Plasma Interactions (Springer Nature, New York, 2023).
  5. H. A. Rose and D. DuBois, Statistical properties of laser hot spots produced by a random phase plate, Phys. Fluids B 5, 590 (1993).
  6. J. Garnier, Statistics of the hot spots of smoothed beams produced by random phase plates revisited, Phys. Plasmas 6, 1601 (1999).
  7. C. Ruyer, A. Fusaro, A. Debayle, R. Capdessus, P. Loiseau, and P. E. Masson-Laborde, Influence of a random phase plate on the growth of the backward stimulated Brillouin scatter, Phys. Rev. E 107, 035208 (2023).
  8. C. Ruyer, A. Fusaro, R. Capdessus, A. Debayle, P. Loiseau, P. Masson-Laborde, and O. Morice, Backward stimulated Brillouin scattering spatial gain with polarization, spatial, and temporal beam smoothing techniques, Phys. Plasmas 30, 122102 (2023).
  9. C. Ruyer, P. Loiseau, R. Riquier, M. Lafon, and V. Tikhonchuk, Statistical theory of a near-forward stimulated Brillouin scattering driven by a spatially and temporally smoothed laser beam, Phys. Plasmas 32, 022112 (2025).
  10. A. Oudin, Y. Lalaire, G. Bouchard, A. Debayle, A. Fusaro, P. Loiseau, C. Ruyer, and D. Benisti, Theory and simulations of cross-beam energy transfer between speckled laser beams, Phys. Plasmas 32, 042706 (2025).
  11. R. J. Adler and J. E. Taylor, Random Fields and Geometry (Springer, New York, 2007).
  12. K. J. Worsley, Local maxima and the expected Euler characteristic of excursion sets of χ2,F and t fields, Adv. Appl. Probab. 26, 13 (1994).
  13. While Rose and DuBois [5] did not consider this shift due to the nature of their ansatz, Garnier [6] introduced the corresponding effective-field correction for the RPP focal-volume problem. The present formulation generalizes this correction in terms of the spectral moments of a homogeneous complex Gaussian field.
  14. R. J. Adler, The Geometry of Random Fields (SIAM, Philadelphia, 2010).
  15. Y. Abdelmoumni-Prunes, C. Rouyer, H. Coïc, D. Bénisti, and N. Bonod, Derivation of the transverse size of the mean speckle throughout propagation from the moments of the Wigner function, Journal of the Optical Society of America A 42, 842 (2025).
  16. If the paraxial Eq. (3) were not transformed to retarded time coordinates, the matrix Λ˚(2) would contain off-diagonal entries. However, its determinant and eigenvalues would remain unchanged, thus the statistics would remain unchanged.
  17. H. A. Rose and D. F. DuBois, Laser hot spots and the breakdown of linear instability theory with application to stimulated Brillouin scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2883 (1994).
  18. C. Oberman and G. Auer, General theory of enhanced induced emission in plasmas, Phys. Fluids 17, 1980 (1974).
  19. R. Berger, E. Williams, and A. Simon, Effect of plasma noise spectrum on stimulated scattering in inhomogeneous plasma, Phys. Fluids B 1, 414 (1989).
  20. D. Carleton, J. Myatt, W. Rozmus, C. Bruulsema, A. Milder, J. Palastro, and D. Froula, Geometric optics model of Thomson scattering enhanced by parametric coupling, Phys. Plasmas 33, 062710 (2026).
  21. A. Brantov, V. Y. Bychenkov, V. Tikhonchuk, W. Rozmus, and V. Senecha, Plasma fluctuations driven by a randomized laser beam, Phys. Plasmas 6, 3002 (1999).
  22. M. Grech, V. Tikhonchuk, G. Riazuelo, and S. Weber, Plasma induced laser beam smoothing below the filamentation threshold, Phys. Plasmas 13, 093104 (2006).
  23. D. H. Froula, S. H. Glenzer, N. C. Luhmann, Jr., and J. Sheffield, Plasma Scattering of Electromagnetic Radiation: Theory and Measurement Techniques (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2010).
  24. The form factor defined by Eq. (65) differs from the standard definition of the S(k,ω) used in the book [23] by the factor ne0.
  25. S. Hüller and A. Porzio, Order statistics and extreme properties of spatially smoothed laser beams in laser-plasma interaction, Laser Part. Beams 28, 463 (2010).
  26. P. Hildén and A. Shevchenko, Extended depth of field of an imaging system with an annular aperture, Opt. Express 31, 11102 (2023).
  27. Garnier multiplied his Gaussian Kac-Rice formula [ [6], Eq. (1)] by a factor of 2 because, under his convention, the covariance is halved by working with a single real Gaussian component of the underlying complex field.

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation