- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Turning without fins: Quantifying the distinct kinematics and vortex dynamics of maneuvering swimming snakes

Elizabeth Gregorio*

Ramiro Godoy-Diana

Anthony Herrel

  • *Contact author: elizabeth.gregorio@espci.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024410 – Published 31 August, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/c57h-kx57

Abstract

The agile turning maneuvers of anguilliform swimmers remain one of the least studied aspects of aquatic locomotion, despite being crucial for survival in underwater environments. To change direction, animals must find a balance between minimizing their moment of inertia and maximizing torque. Anguilliform swimmers, like snakes, are highly maneuverable and accomplish this goal without the aid of limbs or pectoral fins. In this study, we quantify the differences between turning and forward swimming kinematics and hydrodynamics. We present flow field and body deformation measurements taken simultaneously by combining a volumetric three-component defocusing digital particle-tracking velocimetry system with a camera mounted above the tank for swimming kinematics. We determine how snakes manipulate their body position to change swimming direction by analyzing the swimming kinematics of six turns by six individuals as 2D projections (five Natrix maura and one Nerodia rhombifer). Analyses of the body kinematics show that snakes curl their body inwards to shift their center of mass and reduce their moment of inertia to perform faster turns. The volumetric wake measurements allow us to quantify the timing between the turning kinematics and vortex shedding and to compare it with forward swimming measurements. Our results indicate that snakes can generate substantially stronger vortices when turning; for example, the vortex force can be as much as 2.5–8.6× larger when compared to forward swimming. We also use volumetric wake measurements to show that the vortices shed during a turn have the same tubular vortex pair composition as forward swimming. These results help explain how elongated anguilliform swimmers change swimming direction. They widen our understanding of how animals use transient maneuvers to navigate aquatic environments, with implications for both natural swimmers and underwater robots.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (33)

  1. V. Stin, R. Godoy-Diana, X. Bonnet, and A. Herrel, Form and function of anguilliform swimming, Biol. Rev. 99, 2190 (2024).
  2. U. K. Müller, J. Smit, E. J. Stamhuis, and J. J. Videler, How the body contributes to the wake in undulatory fish swimming: Flow fields of a swimming eel (Anguilla anguilla), J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2751 (2001).
  3. B. J. Gemmell, S. M. Fogerson, J. H. Costello, J. R. Morgan, J. O. Dabiri, and S. P. Colin, How the bending kinematics of swimming lampreys build negative pressure fields for suction thrust, J. Exp. Biol. 219, 3884 (2016).
  4. V. Stin, R. Godoy-Diana, X. Bonnet, and A. Herrel, Measuring the 3D wake of swimming snakes (Natrix tessellata) using volumetric particle image velocimetry, J. Exp. Biol. 226, jeb245929 (2023).
  5. S. Kern and P. Koumoutsakos, Simulations of optimized anguilliform swimming, J. Exp. Biol. 209, 4841 (2006).
  6. I. Borazjani and F. Sotiropoulos, Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of anguilliform swimming in the transitional and inertial flow regimes, J. Exp. Biol. 212, 576 (2009).
  7. P. W. Webb, Form and function in fish swimming, Sci. Am. 251, 72 (1984).
  8. A. Herrel, H. F. Choi, E. Dumont, N. De Schepper, B. Vanhooydonck, P. Aerts, and D. Adriaens, Burrowing and subsurface locomotion in anguilliform fish: Behavioral specializations and mechanical constraints, J. Exp. Biol. 214, 1379 (2011).
  9. J. Herault, É. Clement, J. Brossillon, S. LaGrange, V. Lebastard, and F. Boyer, Standing on the water: Stability mechanisms of snakes on free surface, in Biomimetic and Biohybrid Systems: 9th International Conference, Living Machines 2020, Freiburg, Germany, July 28–30, 2020, Proceedings 9 (Springer, Berlin, 2020), pp. 165–175.
  10. K. D'Août and P. Aerts, A kinematic comparison of forward and backward swimming in the eel Anguilla anguilla, J. Exp. Biol. 202, 1511 (1999).
  11. B. C. Jayne, What defines different modes of snake locomotion? Integr. Comp. Biol. 60, 156 (2020).
  12. P. Domenici and R. W. Blake, The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming, J. Exp. Biol. 200, 1165 (1997).
  13. M. Gazzola, W. M. Van Rees, and P. Koumoutsakos, C-start: Optimal start of larval fish, J. Fluid Mech. 698, 5 (2012).
  14. M. S. Triantafyllou, G. S. Triantafyllou, and D. K. P. Yue, Hydrodynamics of fishlike swimming, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 32, 33 (2000).
  15. G. Li, U. K. Müller, J. L. van Leeuwen, and H. Liu, Escape trajectories are deflected when fish larvae intercept their own C-start wake, J. R. Soc. Interface 11, 20140848 (2014).
  16. A. Clark and E. Tytell, Fast turns are not sped up slow turns: How bluegill sunfish change their kinematics with turn speed, bioRxiv (2025).
  17. J. O. Dabiri, S. P. Colin, B. J. Gemmell, K. N. Lucas, M. C. Leftwich, and J. H. Costello, Jellyfish and fish solve the challenges of turning dynamics similarly to achieve high maneuverability, Fluids 5, 106 (2020).
  18. J. H. Costello, S. P. Colin, B. J. Gemmell, J. O. Dabiri, and E. A. Kanso, Turning kinematics of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita, Bioinspir. Biomim. 19, 026005 (2024).
  19. I. K. Bartol, A. M. Ganley, A. N. Tumminelli, P. S. Krueger, and J. T. Thompson, Vectored jets power arms-first and tail-first turns differently in brief squid with assistance from fins and keeled arms, J. Exp. Biol. 225, jeb244151 (2022).
  20. R. Thandiackal and G. V. Lauder, How zebrafish turn: Analysis of pressure force dynamics and mechanical work, J. Exp. Biol. 223, jeb.223230 (2020).
  21. D. J. Li and L. Mendelson, Volumetric measurements of wake impulse and kinetic energy for evaluating swimming performance, Exp. Fluids 64, 47 (2023).
  22. C. Ye, S. Ma, B. Li, and Y. Wang, Turning and side motion of snake-like robot, in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004 (IEEE, New York, 2004), Vol. 5, pp. 5075–5080.
  23. H. Shi, W. Cui, Y. Meng, S. Wang, and Y. Xie, Steering through waters: Exploring turning control techniques for soft underwater snake robots, in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO) (IEEE, New York, 2023), pp. 1–7.
  24. T. Wang, B. Chong, K. Diaz, J. Whitman, H. Lu, M. Travers, D. I. Goldman, and H. Choset, The omega turn: A biologically-inspired turning strategy for elongated limbless robots, in 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE, New York, 2020), pp. 7766–7771.
  25. T. Wang, B. Chong, Y. Deng, R. Fu, H. Choset, and D. I. Goldman, Generalized omega turn gait enables agile limbless robot turning in complex environments, in 2022 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (IEEE, New York, 2022), pp. 01–07.
  26. A. Anastasiadis, A. Rossi, L. Paez, K. Melo, E. D. Tytell, A. J. Ijspeert, and K. Mulleners, Eel-like robot swims more efficiently with increasing joint amplitudes compared to constant joint amplitudes, Phys. Rev. Fluids 9, 110509 (2024).
  27. F. Pereira and M. Gharib, Defocusing digital particle image velocimetry and the three-dimensional characterization of two-phase flows, Meas. Sci. Technol. 13, 683 (2002).
  28. P. G. Saffman, Vortex Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992).
  29. C. Gong, M. J. Travers, H. C. Astley, L. Li, J. R. Mendelson, D. I. Goldman, and H. Choset, Kinematic gait synthesis for snake robots, Int. J. Robot. Res. 35, 100 (2016).
  30. P. Virtanen, R. Gommers, T. E. Oliphant, M. Haberland, T. Reddy, D. Cournapeau, E. Burovski, P. Peterson, W. Weckesser, J. Bright, S. J. van der Walt, M. Brett, J. Wilson, K. J. Millman, N. Mayorov, A. R. J. Nelson, E. Jones, R. Kern, E. Larson, C. J. Carey, et al., SciPy 1.0: Fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nat. Methods 17, 261 (2020).
  31. E. Gregorio, R. Godoy-Diana, and A. Herrel, Swimming kinematics and volumetric wake measurements for Natrix maura and Nerodia rhombifer, data. InDoRES platform (2026), https://doi.org/10.48579/PRO/5Q27ST.
  32. E. Gregorio, V. Stin, R. Godoy-Diana, and A. Herrel, egregorio/Snake-Swimming-Vortex-Code: Turning without fins 3D PIV code (Version v1.0.0) [Computer software], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21564012.
  33. E. Gregorio, R. Godoy-Diana, and A. Herrel, egregorio/Snake-Swimming-Kinematics Turning without fins swimming kinematics code (Version v1.0.0) [Computer software], Zenodo, 2026, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21564055.

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 114, 024410– Published 31 August, 2026
  • Received 20 October 2025
  • Accepted 23 July 2026
Crossmark - Check for updates button

©2026 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation