Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Order parameter for morphodynamic transitions in braided rivers: A stochastic compositional framework

Samuele De Bartolo*

Carlo De Michele

  • Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, via per Monteroni S.P.6, 73100 Lecce, Italy

  • *Contact author: samuele.debartolo@unisalento.it

Phys. Rev. E 114, 034305 – Published 8 September, 2026

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/blfp-62yy

Abstract

We develop a stochastic simplex framework for width partitioning in braided river cross sections, modeling normalized channel widths as random compositional vectors. Two complementary models are introduced: the symmetric Dirichlet distribution, which models width allocation as exchangeable stochastic fluctuations around a uniform baseline with no preferred channel, and the isotropic logistic-normal distribution, which accommodates systematic width concentration through a single scale parameter. Both models carry independent physical content: the Dirichlet characterizes morphodynamic states in which all channels are statistically equivalent, while the logistic-normal identifies and quantifies organized concentration regimes. We derive exact closed-form expressions for the expected concentration index and width concentration fraction under both models, establish a parameter-free structural breakdown criterion, and analyze the temporal evolution of model parameters across 11 annual surveys of the Brahmaputra-Jamuna River (Bangladesh) spanning 1976–2007. The analysis reveals a decadal-scale morphodynamic transition: for 1976–1985, width is distributed among channels in a statistically uniform fashion consistent with the Dirichlet model. From 1995 onwards, a progressive increase in the logistic-normal scale parameter σ*, optimized independently for each survey year and fitted by a logistic regression (R2=0.997), indicates systematic growth of channel width concentration. A parameter-free structural breakdown criterion certifies the failure of the Dirichlet model between 1995 and 1999, where the logistic-normal model recovers goodness-of-fit values above 0.95. Both σ* and the Dirichlet parameter c* retain memory of the concentration phase above pretransition levels throughout the observational window.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (36)

  1. P. Ashmore, Morphology and dynamics of braided rivers, in Treatise on Geomorphology, Vol. 9, Fluvial Geomorphology, edited by E. Wohl (Academic Press, New York, 2013), pp. 289–312.
  2. P. Ashmore, Intensity and characteristic length of braided channel patterns, Can. J. Civ. Eng. 36, 1656 (2009).
  3. W. Bertoldi, L. Zanoni, and M. Tubino, Planform dynamics of braided streams, Earth Surf. Proc. Landf. 34, 547 (2009).
  4. J. L. Best and C. S. Bristow, Braided Rivers: Perspectives and Problems, in Braided Rivers, edited by C. S. Bristow and J. L. Best (Geological Society, London, 1993), pp. 1–11.
  5. E. J. Hundey and P. E. Ashmore, Length scale of braided river morphology, Water Resour. Res. 45, 2008WR007521 (2009).
  6. R. Egozi and P. Ashmore, Experimental analysis of braided channel pattern response to increased discharge, J. Geophys. Res. 114, 2008JF001099 (2009).
  7. A. D. Howard, M. E. Keetch, and C. L. Vincent, Topological and geometrical properties of braided streams, Water Resour. Res. 6, 1674 (1970).
  8. A. M. Gurnell, G. E. Petts, D. M. Hannah, B. P. G. Smith, P. J. Edwards, J. Kollmann, J. V. Ward, and K. Tockner, Riparian vegetation and island formation along the gravel-bed Fiume Tagliamento, Italy, Earth Surf. Process. Landf. 26, 31 (2001).
  9. S. De Bartolo, C. Fallico, and E. Ferrari, Simple scaling analysis of active channel patterns in fiumara environment, Geomorphology 232, 94 (2015).
  10. S. De Bartolo, S. Rizzello, E. Ferrari, F. Frega, G. Napoli, R. Vitolo, M. Scaraggi, N. Fallico, and G. Severino, Scaling behaviour of braided active channels: A Taylor's power law approach, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 137, 622 (2022).
  11. S. De Bartolo and C. De Michele, Braiding as branching at the channel scale: A direct approach to network scaling, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 140, 668 (2025).
  12. S. De Bartolo, C. De Michele, and L. Primavera, Spatial persistence in the Brahmaputra river: Rescaled range and multiscaling analyses, Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess. 40, 78 (2026).
  13. C. De Michele, L. Primavera, G. R. Tomasicchio, A. Lauria, A. Francone, E. Leone, G. Salvadori, and S. De Bartolo, Multifractal analysis of braided channel networks using structure functions and fixed-mass measures, Physica A 675, 130831 (2025).
  14. P. Meakin, Fractals, Scaling and Growth Far from Equilibrium (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1998).
  15. I. Rodríguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  16. P. S. Dodds and D. H. Rothman, Scaling, universality, and geomorphology, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 28, 571 (2000).
  17. O. Malcai, D. A. Lidar, O. Biham, and D. Avnir, Scaling range and cutoffs in empirical fractals, Phys. Rev. E 56, 2817 (1997).
  18. S. Rizzello, M. Scaraggi, A. D. Nelson, L. Primavera, G. Napoli, G. Stecca, R. Vitolo, and S. De Bartolo, Multiscaling behavior of braided channel networks: An alternative formulation of Taylor's law variate transformations, Phys. Rev. E 109, 034306 (2024).
  19. M. Hiatt, W. Sonke, E. A. Addink, W. M. van Dijk, M. van Kreveld, T. Ophelders, K. Verbeek, J. Vlaming, B. Speckmann, and M. G. Kleinhans, Geometry and topology of estuary and braided river channel networks automatically extracted from topographic data, J. Geophys. Res.: Earth Surf. 125, e2019JF005206 (2020).
  20. A. Tejedor, J. Schwenk, M. Kleinhans, A. B. Limaye, L. Vulis, P. Carling, H. Kantz, and E. Foufoula-Georgiou, The entropic braiding index (eBI): A robust metric to account for the diversity of channel scales in multi-thread rivers, Geophys. Res. Lett. 49, e2022GL099681 (2022).
  21. J. Aitchison, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (Chapman and Hall, London, 1986).
  22. J. Aitchison, The statistical analysis of compositional data, J. R. Stat. Soc. B 44, 139 (1982).
  23. E. H. Simpson, Measurement of diversity, Nature (London) 163, 688 (1949).
  24. J. Aitchison and S. M. Shen, Logistic-normal distributions: Some properties and uses, Biometrika 67, 261 (1980).
  25. S. Rizzello, M. Scaraggi, A. D. Nelson, L. Primavera, G. Napoli, G. Stecca, R. Vitolo, and S. De Bartolo, Software and dataset (aggregation, variance and mean in braided channel networks) [Computer software], Zenodo, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10104612.
  26. S. De Bartolo, S. Rizzello, R. Vitolo, M. Scaraggi, G. Napoli, A. D. Nelson, and G. Stecca, Dataset (aggregation, variance and mean in braided channel networks) [Dataset], Zenodo, 2023, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.8019973.
  27. M. H. Sarker, C. R. Thorne, M. N. Aktar, and M. R. Ferdous, Morpho-dynamics of the Brahmaputra–Jamuna River, Bangladesh, Geomorphology 215, 45 (2014).
  28. K. Gaurav, F. Métivier, O. Devauchelle, R. Sinha, H. Chauvet, M. Houssais, and H. Bouquerel, Morphology of the Kosi megafan channels, Earth Surf. Dynam. 3, 321 (2015).
  29. K. Gaurav, S. K. Tandon, O. Devauchelle, R. Sinha, and F. Métivier, A single width–discharge regime relationship for individual threads of braided and meandering rivers from the Himalayan Foreland, Geomorphology 295, 126 (2017).
  30. G. Lacey, Stable channels in alluvium, Minutes Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. 229, 259 (1930).
  31. L. B. Leopold and T. Maddock, Jr., The hydraulic geometry of stream channels and some physiographic implications, in U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper Vol. 252 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1953).
  32. L. B. Leopold, M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller, Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1964).
  33. F. Métivier, O. Devauchelle, H. Chauvet, E. Lajeunesse, P. Meunier, K. Blanckaert, P. Ashmore, Z. Zhang, Y. Fan, Y. Liu, Z. Dong, and B. Ye, Geometry of meandering and braided gravel-bed threads from the Bayanbulak Grassland, Tianshan, and P. R. China, Earth Surf. Dynam. 4, 273 (2016).
  34. F. Métivier, E. Lajeunesse, and O. Devauchelle, Laboratory rivers: Lacey's law, threshold theory, and channel stability, Earth Surf. Dynam. 5, 187 (2017).
  35. M. P. Mosley, Semi-determinate hydraulic geometry of river channels, South Island, New Zealand, Earth Surf. Proc. Landf. 6, 127 (1981).
  36. A. M. F. da Silva and M. S. Yalin, Fluvial Processes, IAHR Monographs, 2nd ed. (Routledge, London, 2017).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation