- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Data-driven inference of hidden nodes in networks
Phys. Rev. E 99, 042114 – Published 10 April, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.99.042114
Abstract
The explosion of activity in finding interactions in complex systems is driven by availability of copious observations of complex natural systems. However, such systems, e.g., the human brain, are rarely completely observable. Interaction network inference must then contend with hidden variables affecting the behavior of the observed parts of the system. We present an effective approach for model inference with hidden variables. From configurations of observed variables, we identify the observed-to-observed, hidden-to-observed, observed-to-hidden, and hidden-to-hidden interactions, the configurations of hidden variables, and the number of hidden variables. We demonstrate the performance of our method by simulating a kinetic Ising model, and show that our method outperforms existing methods. Turning to real data, we infer the hidden nodes in a neuronal network in the salamander retina and a stock market network. We show that predictive modeling with hidden variables is significantly more accurate than that without hidden variables. Finally, an important hidden variable problem is to find the number of clusters in a dataset. We apply our method to classify MNIST handwritten digits. We find that there are about 60 clusters which are roughly equally distributed among the digits.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (28)
- E. Schneidman, Michael J. Berry II, R. Segev, and W. Bialek, Nature 440, 1007 (2006).
- D. A. Dombeck, A. N. Khabbaz, F. Collman, T. L. Adelman, and D. W. Tank, Neuron 56, 43 (2007).
- J. P. Nguyen, F. B. Shipley, A. N. Linder, G. S. Plummer, M. Liu, S. U. Setru, J. W. Shaevitz, and A. M. Leifer, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, E1074 (2016).
- D. Bernal-Casas, H. J. Lee, A. J. Weitz, and J. H. Lee, Neuron 93, 522 (2017).
- T. R. Lezon, J. R. Banavar, M. Cieplak, A. Maritan, and N. V. Fedoroff, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 19033 (2006).
- G. Hickman and C. Hodgman, J. Bioinformat. Comput. Biol. 7, 1013 (2009).
- Z. Bar-Joseph, A. Gitter, and I. Simon, Nature Rev. Genet. 13, 552 (2012).
- S. Pincus and R. E. Kalman, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 13709 (2004).
- C. K. Tse, J. Liu, and F. C. Lau, J. Empir. Finance 17, 659 (2010).
- B. M. Tabak, T. R. Serra, and D. O. Cajueiro, Physica A 389, 3240 (2010).
- T. Bury, Physica A 392, 1375 (2013).
- B. Dunn and Y. Roudi, Phys. Rev. E 87, 022127 (2013).
- A. P. Dempster, N. M. Laird, and D. B. Rubin, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 39, 1 (1977).
- J. Tyrcha and J. Hertz, Math. Biosci. Engineer. 11, 149 (2014).
- L. Bachschmid-Romano and M. Opper, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2014) P06013.
- C. Battistin, J. Hertz, J. Tyrcha, and Y. Roudi, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2015) P05021.
- D.-T. Hoang, J. Song, V. Periwal, and J. Jo, Phys. Rev. E 99, 023311 (2019).
- D.-T. Hoang, J. Song, V. Periwal, and J. Jo, Network Inference in Stochastic Systems, https://nihcompmed.github.io/network-inference/.
- D.-T. Hoang, J. Jo, and V. Periwal, Network Inference with Hidden Variables, https://nihcompmed.github.io/hidden-variable/.
- Y. Roudi and J. Hertz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 048702 (2011).
- M. Mézard and J. Sakellariou, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2011) L07001.
- H.-L. Zeng, M. Alava, E. Aurell, J. Hertz, and Y. Roudi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 210601 (2013).
- H. Akaike, IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 19, 716 (1974).
- G. Schwarz, Ann. Stat. 6, 461 (1978).
- D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975).
- G. Tkačik, O. Marre, D. Amodei, E. Schneidman, W. Bialek, and M. J. Berry, II, PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003408 (2014).
- Fusion Media Limited, Stock Quotes: SP 500, https://www.investing.com/equities/.
- Y. Lecun, L. Bottou, Y. Bengio, and P. Haffner, Proc. IEEE 86, 2278 (1998).