Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Possible ergodic-nonergodic regions in the quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick spin glass model and quantum annealing

Sudip Mukherjee1,2,*, Atanu Rajak2,3,†, and Bikas K. Chakrabarti2,‡

  • 1Barasat Government College, Barasat, Kolkata 700124, India
  • 2Condensed Matter Physics Division, Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, 1/AF Bidhannagar, Kolkata 700064, India
  • 3Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

  • *sudip.mukherjee@saha.ac.in
  • raj.atanu009@gmail.com
  • bikask.chakrabarti@saha.ac.in

Phys. Rev. E 97, 022146 – Published 28 February, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022146

Abstract

We explore the behavior of the order parameter distribution of the quantum Sherrington-Kirkpatrick model in the spin glass phase using Monte Carlo technique for the effective Suzuki-Trotter Hamiltonian at finite temperatures and that at zero temperature obtained using the exact diagonalization method. Our numerical results indicate the existence of a low- but finite-temperature quantum-fluctuation-dominated ergodic region along with the classical fluctuation-dominated high-temperature nonergodic region in the spin glass phase of the model. In the ergodic region, the order parameter distribution gets narrower around the most probable value of the order parameter as the system size increases. In the other region, the Parisi order distribution function has nonvanishing value everywhere in the thermodynamic limit, indicating nonergodicity. We also show that the average annealing time for convergence (to a low-energy level of the model, within a small error range) becomes system size independent for annealing down through the (quantum-fluctuation-dominated) ergodic region. It becomes strongly system size dependent for annealing through the nonergodic region. Possible finite-size scaling-type behavior for the extent of the ergodic region is also addressed.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (21)

  1. K. Binder and A. P. Young, Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 801 (1986).
  2. D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975).
  3. G. Parisi, J. Phys. A 13, L115 (1980).
  4. A. Das and B. K. Chakrabarti, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1061 (2008).
  5. P. Ray, B. K. Chakrabarti, and A. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. B. 39, 11828 (1989).
  6. S. Mukherjee and B. K. Chakrabarti, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 224, 17 (2015).
  7. S. Tanaka, R. Tamura, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Quantum Spin Glasses, Annealing and Computation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2017).
  8. S. Mandra, Z. Zhu, and H. G. Katzgraber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 070502 (2017).
  9. T. Albash and D. Lidar, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).
  10. D. Herr, E. Brown, B. Heim, M. Könz, G. Mazzola, and M. Troyer, arXiv:1705.00420.
  11. A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1206 (1983).
  12. S. Mukherjee, A. Rajak, and B. K. Chakrabarti, Phys. Rev. E 92, 042107 (2015).
  13. N. Y. Yao, F. Grusdt, B. Swingle, M. D. Lukin, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, J. E. Moore, and E. Demler, arXiv:1607.01801.
  14. A. Dutta, G. Aeppli, B. K. Chakrabarti, U. Divakaran, T. Rosenbaum, and D. Sen, Quantum Phase Transitions in Transverse Field Models (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2015).
  15. A. W. Sandvik, AIP Conf. Proc. 1297, 135 (2010).
  16. A. Rajak and B. K. Chakrabarti, Ind. J. Phys. 88, 951 (2014).
  17. Y. Goldschmidt and P.-Y. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 2467 (1990).
  18. N. Read, S. Sachdev, and J. Ye, Phys. Rev. B. 52, 384 (1995).
  19. A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. E. 96, 032112 (2017).
  20. V. S. Denchev, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, N. Ding, R. Babbush, V. Smelyanskiy, J. Martinis, and H. Neven, Phys. Rev. X 6, 031015 (2016).
  21. C. Baldassi and R. Zecchina, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 1457 (2018).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation