Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Path-integral Monte Carlo simulation of time-reversal noninvariant bulk systems with a case study of rotating Yukawa gases

Tamás Haidekker Galambos1,2,3 and Csaba Tőke1,2

  • 1BME-MTA Exotic Quantum Phases “Lendület” Research Group, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Physics, Budafoki út 8, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
  • 2Department of Theoretical Physics, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Institute of Physics, Budafoki út 8, H-1111 Budapest, Hungary
  • 3Department of Physics, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 82, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland

Phys. Rev. E 97, 022140 – Published 26 February, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022140

Abstract

We elaborate on the methodology to simulate bulk systems in the absence of time-reversal symmetry by the phase-fixed path-integral Monte Carlo method under (possibly twisted) periodic boundary conditions. Such systems include two-dimensional electrons in the quantum Hall regime and rotating ultracold Bose and Fermi gases; time-reversal symmetry is broken by an external magnetic field and the Coriolis force, respectively. We provide closed-form expressions in terms of Jacobi elliptic functions for the thermal density matrix (or the Euclidean propagator) of a single particle on a flat torus under very general conditions. We then modify the multislice sampling method in order to sample paths by the magnitude of the complex-valued thermal density matrix. Finally, we demonstrate that these inventions let us study the vortex melting process of a two-dimensional Yukawa gas in terms of the de Boer interaction strength parameter, temperature, and rotation (Coriolis force). The bosonic case is relevant to ultracold Fermi-Fermi mixtures of widely different masses under rotation.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. D. M. Ceperley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 67, 279 (1995).
  2. N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
  3. W. K. Hastings, Biometrika 57, 97 (1970).
  4. D. M. Ceperley, J. Stat. Phys. 63, 1237 (1991).
  5. D. M. Ceperley, in Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics of Condensed Matter Systems, edited by K. Binder and G. Ciccotti (Italian Physical Society, Bologna, Italy, 1996).
  6. G. Ortiz, D. M. Ceperley, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 2777 (1993).
  7. F. Bolton, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4780 (1996).
  8. W. M. C. Foulkes, L. Mitas, R. J. Needs, and G. Rajagopal, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 33 (2001).
  9. V. Akkineni, dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2008).
  10. V. Melik-Alaverdian and N. E. Bonesteel, Phys. Rev. B 52, R17032 (1995).
  11. V. Melik-Alaverdian, N. E. Bonesteel, and G. Ortiz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5286 (1997).
  12. C. Lin, F. H. Zong, and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. E 64, 016702 (2001).
  13. J. Shao, E.-A. Kim, F. D. M. Haldane, and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 206402 (2015).
  14. E. L. Pollock and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B 30, 2555 (1984).
  15. D. R. Nelson and H. S. Seung, Phys. Rev. B 39, 9153 (1989).
  16. W. R. Magro and D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. B 48, 411 (1993).
  17. H. Nordborg and G. Blatter, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1925 (1997).
  18. D. S. Petrov, G. E. Astrakharchik, D. J. Papoular, C. Salomon, and G. V. Shlyapnikov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130407 (2007).
  19. K. W. Madison, F. Chevy, W. Wohlleben, and J. Dalibard, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 806 (2000).
  20. J. R. Abo-Shaeer, C. Raman, J. M. Vogels, and W. Ketterle, Science 292, 476 (2001).
  21. E. Hodby, G. Hechenblaikner, S. A. Hopkins, O. M. Maragò, and C. J. Foot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 010405 (2001).
  22. P. C. Haljan, I. Coddington, P. Engels, and E. A. Cornell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 210403 (2001).
  23. D. M. Ceperley, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 331 (1992).
  24. C. Pierleoni, D. M. Ceperley, B. Bernu, and W. R. Magro, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 2145 (1994).
  25. W. R. Magro, D. M. Ceperley, C. Pierleoni, and B. Bernu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1240 (1996).
  26. J. Zak, Phys. Rev. 134, A1602 (1964).
  27. Just like its time-reversal symmetric counterpart, ρPBC(r,r;β) describes diffusive motion in imaginary time (inverse temperature), but it also has a gauge-dependent phase factor. Compared to the case without the external magnetic field, the diffusion process described by Eq. (10) is slower; for large imaginary time β, the width of the Gaussian |ρopen(r,r;β)| tends to a finite value determined by the magnetic length. In the other limit, βωc1, this Gaussian grows with the same rate as in the absence of the magnetic field.
  28. D. Mumford, Tata Lectures on Theta I, Modern Birkhäuser Classics (Springer, Boston, 1987).
  29. Traditionally defined Jacobi elliptic functions correspond to ϑ1212(z|τ)=ϑ1(z|τ),ϑ120(z|τ)=ϑ2(z|τ),ϑ00(z|τ)=ϑ3(z|τ), and ϑ012(z|τ)=ϑ4(z|τ). Notice that sometimes a factor π is factored out of the argument, i.e., ϑabzπ|τ is defined.
  30. Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 485 (1959).
  31. N. Byers and C. N. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 7, 46 (1961).
  32. J. Cao, Phys. Rev. E 49, 882 (1994).
  33. N. K. Wilkin, J. M. F. Gunn, and R. A. Smith, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2265 (1998).
  34. N. R. Cooper, Adv. Phys. 57, 539 (2008).
  35. Due to the computational complexity of the permanent, phase-fixing by the free Bose gas is actually more difficult than by the free Fermi gas. In this case study, we will restrict our work to relatively small systems.
  36. F. D. M. Haldane and E. H. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 31, 2529 (1985).
  37. P. Lévay, J. Math. Phys. 36, 2792 (1995).
  38. N. Read and E. Rezayi, Phys. Rev. B 54, 16864 (1996).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation