Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Gauge-free cluster variational method by maximal messages and moment matching

Eduardo Domínguez1,2, Alejandro Lage-Castellanos1,2,3, Roberto Mulet1,2, and Federico Ricci-Tersenghi4

  • 1Department of Theoretical Physics, Physics Faculty, University of Havana, La Habana, CP 10400, Cuba
  • 2“Henri Poincaré” group of Complex Systems, University of Havana, Cuba
  • 3CNRS, Laboratoire de Physique Statistique, École Normale Suprieure, 75005, Paris
  • 4Dipartimento di Fisica, INFN–Sezione di Roma 1 and CNR–Nanotec, unità di Roma, Università La Sapienza, P.le A. Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy

Phys. Rev. E 95, 043308 – Published 25 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.043308

Abstract

We present an implementation of the cluster variational method (CVM) as a message passing algorithm. The kind of message passing algorithm used for CVM, usually named generalized belief propagation (GBP), is a generalization of the belief propagation algorithm in the same way that CVM is a generalization of the Bethe approximation for estimating the partition function. However, the connection between fixed points of GBP and the extremal points of the CVM free energy is usually not a one-to-one correspondence because of the existence of a gauge transformation involving the GBP messages. Our contribution is twofold. First, we propose a way of defining messages (fields) in a generic CVM approximation, such that messages arrive on a given region from all its ancestors, and not only from its direct parents, as in the standard parent-to-child GBP. We call this approach maximal messages. Second, we focus on the case of binary variables, reinterpreting the messages as fields enforcing the consistency between the moments of the local (marginal) probability distributions. We provide a precise rule to enforce all consistencies, avoiding any redundancy, that would otherwise lead to a gauge transformation on the messages. This moment matching method is gauge free, i.e., it guarantees that the resulting GBP is not gauge invariant. We apply our maximal messages and moment matching GBP to obtain an analytical expression for the critical temperature of the Ising model in general dimensions at the level of plaquette CVM. The values obtained outperform Bethe estimates, and are comparable with loop corrected belief propagation equations. The method allows for a straightforward generalization to disordered systems.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (30)

  1. K. Huang, Statistical Mechanics (Wiley, New York, 1987).
  2. G. Parisi, M. Mézard, and M. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
  3. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, Eur. Phys. J. B 20, 217 (2001).
  4. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, J. Stat. Phys. 111, 1 (2003).
  5. M. Mézard and A. Montanari, Information, Physics, and Computation (Oxford University Press, New York, 2009).
  6. J. Yedidia, W. T. Freeman, and Y. Weiss, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51, 2282 (2005).
  7. T. Rizzo, A. Lage-Castellanos, R. Mulet, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, J. Stat. Phys. 139, 375 (2010).
  8. A. Lage-Castellanos, R. Mulet, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and T. Rizzo, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 135001 (2013).
  9. J.-Q. Xiao and H. Zhou, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 425001 (2011).
  10. H. Zhou and C. Wang, J. Stat. Phys. 148, 513 (2012).
  11. E. Domínguez, A. Lage-Castellanos, and R. Mulet, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2015) P07003.
  12. K. Tanaka and T. Morita, Phys. Lett. A 203, 122 (1995).
  13. K. Tanaka, J. Inoue, and D. M. Titterington, in XIII Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE Signal Processing Society Workshop, 17-19 September, 2003 (IEEE Computer Society, Piscataway, NJ, 2003), pp. 329–338.
  14. M. Yasuda, S. Kataoka, and K. Tanaka, Phys. Rev. E 92, 042120 (2015).
  15. E. Gouillart, F. Krzakala, M. Mézard, and L. Zdeborová, Inverse Probl. 29, 035003 (2013).
  16. J.-C. Sibel and S. Reynal, International Conference on Control, Automation and Information Sciences (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, 2012), p. 4.
  17. P. Pakzad and V. Anantharam, Neural Comput. 17, 1836 (2005).
  18. C. Wang and H.-J. Zhou, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 473, 012004 (2013).
  19. E. Domínguez, A. Lage-Castellanos, R. Mulet, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and T. Rizzo, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2011) P12007.
  20. C. Furtlehner and A. Decelle, J. Stat. Phys. 164, 531 (2016).
  21. M. Opper and O. Winther, J. Machine Learning Res. 6, 2177 (2005).
  22. M. Yasuda, S. Kataoka, and K. Tanaka, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 044801 (2012).
  23. A. Montanari and T. Rizzo, J. Stat. Mech.: Theor. Exp. (2005) P10011.
  24. J. S. Yedidia, in Advanced Mean Field Methods: Theory and Practice, edited by D. Saad and M. Opper (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2000), Chap. 3, p. 21.
  25. R. Kikuchi, Phys. Rev. 81, 988 (1951).
  26. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  27. A. Lage-Castellanos, R. Mulet, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and T. Rizzo, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046706 (2011).
  28. M. N. Barber, R. B. Pearson, D. Toussaint, and J. L. Richardson, Phys. Rev. B 32, 1720 (1985).
  29. D. Gaunt, M. Sykes, and S. McKenzie, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 12, 871 (1979).
  30. G. Parisi and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. B 54, R3698 (1996).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation