Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Hysteresis in relative permeabilities suffices for propagation of saturation overshoot: A quantitative comparison with experiment

R. Steinle and R. Hilfer

  • Institute for Computational Physics, Universität Stuttgart, Allmandring 3, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany

Phys. Rev. E 95, 043112 – Published 25 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.043112

Abstract

Traditional Darcy theory for two-phase flow in porous media is shown to predict the propagation of nonmonotone saturation profiles, also known as saturation overshoot. The phenomenon depends sensitively on the constitutive parameters, on initial conditions, and on boundary conditions. Hysteresis in relative permeabilities is needed to observe the effect. Two hysteresis models are discussed and compared. The shape of overshoot solutions can change as a function of time or remain fixed and time independent. Traveling-wave-like overshoot profiles of fixed width exist in experimentally accessible regions of parameter space. They are compared quantitatively against experiment.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (27)

  1. R. Hilfer and R. Steinle, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 223, 2323 (2014).
  2. R. Steinle and R. Hilfer, Transp. Porous Media 111, 369 (2016).
  3. E. Youngs, Soil Sci. 86, 202 (1958).
  4. J. Briggs and D. Katz, Drainage of Water from Sand in Developing Aquifer Storage, in Proceedings of the 41st Annual Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME, Dallas, 1966 (AIME, Dallas, 1966), paper SPE1501.
  5. H. Alt and S. Luckhaus, Math. Z. 183, 311 (1983).
  6. H. Alt, S. Luckhaus, and A. Visintin, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 136, 303 (1984).
  7. R. Glass, T. Steenhuis, and J. Parlange, Soil Sci. 148, 60 (1989).
  8. F. Otto, J. Differ. Equations 131, 20 (1996)
  9. A. Beliaev and S. Hassanizadeh, Transp. Porous Media 43, 487 (2001).
  10. D. DiCarlo, Water Resour. Res. 40, W04215 (2004).
  11. S. Shiozawa and H. Fujimaki, Water Resour. Res. 40, W07404 (2004).
  12. C. van Duijn, L. Peletier, and I. Pop, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 39, 507 (2007).
  13. L. Cueto-Felgueroso and R. Juanes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 244504 (2008).
  14. L. Cueto-Felgueroso and R. Juanes, Phys. Rev. E 79, 036301 (2009).
  15. D. DiCarlo, M. Mirzaei, B. Aminzadeh, and H. Dehghanpour, Transp. Porous Media 91, 955 (2012).
  16. D. DiCarlo, Water Resour. Res. 49, 4531 (2013).
  17. C. van Duijn, Y. Fan, L. Peletier, and I. Pop, Nonlinear Anal.: Real World Appl. 14, 1361 (2013).
  18. Y. Xiong, J. Hydrol. 510, 353 (2014).
  19. A. Egorov, R. Dautov, J. Nieber, and A. Sheshukov, Water Resour. Res. 39, 1266 (2003).
  20. L. Richards, Physics 1, 318 (1931).
  21. M. Eliassi and R. Glass, Water Resour. Res. 38, 16-1 (2002).
  22. D. DiCarlo, R. Juanes, T. LaForce, and T. Witelski, Water Resour. Res. 44, W02406 (2008).
  23. M. Krasnoselski and A. Pokrovski, Systems With Hysteresis (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
  24. A. Visintin, Differential Models of Hysteresis (Springer, Berlin, 1994).
  25. R. Collins, Flow of Fluids Through Porous Materials (Reinhold, New York, 1961).
  26. OpenFOAM, version 2.1.1, available at http://www.openfoam.org.
  27. M. Schroth, S. Ahearn, J. Selker, and J. Istok, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60, 1331 (1996).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation