Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Ising spin glasses in two dimensions: Universality and nonuniversality

P. H. Lundow1 and I. A. Campbell2

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
  • 2Laboratoire Charles Coulomb, Université Montpellier II, 34095 Montpellier, France

Phys. Rev. E 95, 042107 – Published 5 April, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042107

Abstract

Following numerous earlier studies, extensive simulations and analyses were made on the continuous interaction distribution Gaussian model and the discrete bimodal interaction distribution Ising spin glass (ISG) models in two dimensions [Lundow and Campbell, Phys. Rev. E 93, 022119 (2016)]. Here we further analyze the bimodal and Gaussian data together with data on two other continuous interaction distribution two-dimensional ISG models, the uniform and the Laplacian models, and three other discrete interaction distribution models, a diluted bimodal model, an “antidiluted” model, and a more exotic symmetric Poisson model. Comparisons between the three continuous distribution models show that not only do they share the same exponent η0 but that to within the present numerical precision they share the same critical exponent ν also, and so lie in a single universality class. On the other hand the critical exponents of the four discrete distribution models are not the same as those of the continuous distributions, and the present data strongly indicate that they differ from one discrete distribution model to another. This is evidence that discrete distribution ISG models in two dimensions have nonzero values of the critical exponent η and do not lie in a single universality class.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (41)

  1. P. H. Lundow and I. A. Campbell, Phys. Rev. E 93, 022119 (2016).
  2. A. K. Hartmann and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 64, 180404(R) (2001).
  3. M. Ohzeki and H. Nishimori, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 332001 (2009).
  4. H. Rieger, L. Santen, U. Blasum, M. Diehl, M. Jünger, and G. Rinaldi, J. Phys. A 29, 3939 (1996); 30, 8795(E) (1997).
  5. A. K. Hartmann and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 66, 094419 (2002).
  6. A. C. Carter, A. J. Bray, and M. A. Moore, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 077201 (2002).
  7. A. K. Hartmann, A. J. Bray, A. C. Carter, M. A. Moore, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 66, 224401 (2002).
  8. J. Houdayer and A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. B 70, 014418 (2004).
  9. L. A. Fernandez, E. Marinari, V. Martin-Mayor, G. Parisi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. B 94, 024402 (2016).
  10. T. Jörg, J. Lukic, E. Marinari, and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 237205 (2006).
  11. I. Morgenstern and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. B 22, 288 (1980).
  12. W. L. McMillan, Phys. Rev. B 28, 5216 (1983).
  13. J.-S. Wang and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. B 37, 7745 (1988).
  14. Y. Ozeki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 59, 3531 (1990).
  15. J. Houdayer, Eur. Phys. J. B 22, 479 (2001).
  16. H. G. Katzgraber and L. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 71, 134404 (2005).
  17. H. G. Katzgraber, Lik Wee Lee, and I. A. Campbell, Phys. Rev. B 75, 014412 (2007).
  18. J. Poulter and J. A. Blackman, Phys. Rev. B 72, 104422 (2005).
  19. A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. B 77, 144418 (2008).
  20. F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E 82, 021106 (2010).
  21. F. Parisen Toldin, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E 84, 051116 (2011).
  22. T. Jörg, Phys. Rev. B 73, 224431 (2006).
  23. F. J. Wegner, Phys. Rev. B 5, 4529 (1972).
  24. I. A. Campbell, K. Hukushima, and H. Takayama, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 117202 (2006); Phys. Rev. B 76, 134421 (2007).
  25. P. Butera and M. Comi, Phys. Rev. B 69, 174416 (2004).
  26. J. Salas and A. D. Sokal, J. Stat. Phys. 98, 551 (2000).
  27. H. G. Katzgraber, I. A. Campbell, and A. K. Hartmann, Phys. Rev. B 78, 184409 (2008).
  28. J. L. Cardy, J. Phys. A 17, L961 (1984).
  29. J. Wu and D. C. Mattis, Phys. Rev. B 67, 224414 (2003).
  30. H. G. Ballesteros, A. Cruz, L. A. Fernandez, V. Martin-Mayor, J. Pech, J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, A. Tarancon, P. Tellez, C. L. Ullod, and C. Ungil, Phys. Rev. B 62, 14237 (2000).
  31. J. Lukic, E. Marinari, and O. C. Martin, Europhys. Lett. 73, 779 (2006).
  32. F. Merz and J. T. Chalker, Phys. Rev. B 65, 054425 (2002).
  33. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 14, 1313 (1981).
  34. D. J. Elderfield and A. J. McKane, Phys. Rev. B 18, 3730 (1978).
  35. P. H. Lundow and I. A. Campbell, Phys. Rev. E 91, 042121 (2015).
  36. P. H. Lundow and I. A. Campbell, Physica A 434, 181 (2015).
  37. P. H. Lundow and I. A. Campbell, Phys. Rev. E 95, 012112 (2017).
  38. J. Villain, J. Phys. C 10, 1717 (1977).
  39. G. Forgacs, Phys. Rev. B 22, 4473 (1980).
  40. C. K. Thomas and A. A. Middleton, Phys. Rev. B 76, 220406(R) (2007).
  41. C. K. Thomas, D. A. Huse, and A. A. Middleton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 047203 (2011).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation