- Access by Xinjiang University
Tricritical behavior of nonequilibrium Ising spins in fluctuating environments
Phys. Rev. E 95, 042106 – Published 5 April, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.042106
Abstract
We investigate the phase transitions in a coupled system of Ising spins and a fluctuating network. Each spin interacts with neighbors through links of the rewiring network. The Ising spins and the network are in thermal contact with the heat baths at temperatures and , respectively, so the whole system is driven out of equilibrium for . The model is a generalization of the -neighbor Ising model [A. Jędrzejewski et al., Phys. Rev. E 92, 052105 (2015)], which corresponds to the limiting case of . Despite the mean-field nature of the interaction, the -neighbor Ising model was shown to display a discontinuous phase transition for . Setting up the rate equations for the magnetization and the energy density, we obtain the phase diagram in the parameter space. The phase diagram consists of a ferromagnetic phase and a paramagnetic phase. The two phases are separated by a continuous phase transition belonging to the mean-field universality class or by a discontinuous phase transition with an intervening coexistence phase. The equilibrium system with falls into the former case while the -neighbor Ising model falls into the latter case. At the tricritical point, the system exhibits the mean-field tricritical behavior. Our model demonstrates a possibility that a continuous phase transition turns into a discontinuous transition by a nonequilibrium driving. Heat flow induced by the temperature difference between two heat baths is also studied.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (20)
- A. Jędrzejewski, A. Chmiel, and K. Sznajd-Weron, Phys. Rev. E 92, 052105 (2015).
- S. H. Lee, M. Ha, H. Jeong, J. D. Noh, and H. Park, Phys. Rev. E 80, 051127 (2009).
- A. De Masi, P. A. Ferrari, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 1947 (1985).
- J. M. Gonzalez-Miranda, P. L. Garido, J. Marro, and J. L. Lebowitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1934 (1987).
- M. Droz, Z. Rácz, and P. Tartaglia, Phys. Rev. A 41, 6621 (1990).
- K. E. Bassler and Z. Rácz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1320 (1994).
- A. Szolnoki, Phys. Rev. E 62, 7466 (2000).
- M. Pleimling, B. Schmittmann, and R. K. P. Zia, Europhys. Lett. 89, 50001 (2010).
- N. Borchers, M. Pleimling, and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. E 90, 062113 (2014).
- G. Grinstein, C. Jayaprakash, and Y. He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2527 (1985).
- H. Blöte, J. R. Heringa, A. Hoogland, and R. K. P. Zia, J. Phys. A 23, 3799 (1990).
- B. Schmittmann and R. K. P. Zia, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 357 (1991).
- B. Schmittmann, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 04, 2269 (1990).
- Z. Cheng, P. L. Garrido, J. L. Lebowitz, and J. L. Vallés, Europhys. Lett. 14, 507 (1991).
- E. L. Praestgaard, H. Larsen, and R. K. P. Zia, Europhys. Lett. 25, 447 (1994).
- P. S. Shim, H.-M. Chun, and J. D. Noh, Phys. Rev. E 93, 012113 (2016).
- K. Binder and D. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics, Vol. 80 of An Introduction (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010).
- N. Goldenfeld, Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group (Addison-Wesley, Reading, 1992).
- S. Maslov and K. Sneppen, Science 296, 910 (2002).
- J. D. Noh, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026116 (2007).