Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Open Access
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Statistical mechanics of the triple contact line

Michel Y. Louge*

  • Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA

  • *Michel.Louge@cornell.edu

Phys. Rev. E 95, 032804 – Published 31 March, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032804

Abstract

We outline a statistical mechanics of the triple gas-solid-liquid contact line on a rough plane. The analysis regards the neighborhood of the line as a solid dotted with cavities. It adopts the simplest mean-field statistical mechanics, in which each cavity is either full or empty, while being connected to near neighbors by thin necks. The theory predicts equilibrium angles for advance and recession in terms of the Young contact angle and the joint statistical distribution of two quantifiable geometrical parameters representing specific neck cross-section and specific cavity opening. It attributes contact angle hysteresis to first-order phase transitions among adjacent cavities, as they collectively imbibe or reject liquid. It also calculates the potential energy barriers that hysteresis erects against overcoming contact line pinning. By determining whether the phase transitions can release latent energy, this ab initio analysis distinguishes six regimes, including two metastable recession states. We compare predictions with data for superhydrophobia on microscopic rods; for hysteresis in the “Wenzel state”; and for variations of the advancing contact angle with surface energies of the liquid.

View figure in article

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. R. E. Johnson and R. H. Dettre, J. Phys. Chem. 68, 1744 (1964).
  2. C. Priest, T. Albrecht, R. Sedev, and J. Ralston, Langmuir 25, 5655 (2009).
  3. M. A. Nilsson and J. P. Rothstein, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 363, 646 (2011).
  4. N. T. Chamakos, M. E. Kavousanakis, A. G. Boudouvis, and A. G. Papathanasiou, Phys. Fluids 28, 022105 (2016).
  5. G. Whyman, E. Bormashenko, and T. Stein, Chem. Phys. Lett. 450, 355 (2008).
  6. J. P. Rothstein, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 42, 89 (2010).
  7. E. Wolfram, R. Faust, and J. F. Padday, Wetting, Spreading and Adhesion, edited by J. F. Padday (Academic, London, UK, 1978).
  8. E. Schäffer and P.-Z. Wong, Phys. Rev. E 61, 5257 (2000).
  9. D. Quéré, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 38, 71 (2008).
  10. D. Bonn, J. Eggers, J. Indekeu, J. Meunier, and E. Rolley, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 739 (2009).
  11. B. K. Larkin, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 23, 305 (1967).
  12. R. A. Brown, F. M. Orr, and L. E. Scriven, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 73, 76 (1980).
  13. Y. Rotenberg, L. Boruvka, and A. W. Neumann, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 102, 424 (1984).
  14. C. W. Extrand and A. N. Gent, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 138, 431 (1990).
  15. J. Xu and M. Y. Louge, Phys. Rev. E 92, 062405 (2015).
  16. J. D. Coninck, Colloids Surf., A 89, 109 (1994).
  17. R. Tadmor, Langmuir 20, 7659 (2004).
  18. H. Fujii and H. Nakae, Philos. Mag. A 72, 1505 (1995).
  19. W. G. Vincenti and C. H. Kruger, Introduction to Physical Gas Dynamics (Wiley, New York, 1965).
  20. J. B. Bostwick and P. H. Steen, J. Fluid Mech. 714, 336 (2013).
  21. L. Steub, J. Kollmer, D. Paxson, A. Sack, T. Pöschel, J. Bartlett, D. Berman, Y. Richardson, and M. Y. Louge, Microgravity spreading of water spheres on hydrophobic capillary plates, Powders and Grains, edited by F. Radjai (EDP Sciences, Les Ulis, France, 2017).
  22. A. B. D. Cassie and S. Baxter, Trans. Faraday Soc. 40, 546 (1944).
  23. A. Lafuma and D. Quéré, Nat. Mater. 2, 457 (2003).
  24. M. Callies and D. Quéré, Soft Matter 1, 55 (2005).
  25. L. Gao and T. J. McCarthy, Langmuir 22, 6234 (2006).
  26. E. Celia, T. Darmanin, E. T. de Givenchy, S. Amigoni, and F. Guittard, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 402, 1 (2013).
  27. S. Herminghaus, Europhys. Lett. 52, 165 (2000).
  28. M. Ma and R. M. Hill, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 11, 193 (2006).
  29. G. Whyman and E. Bormashenko, Langmuir 27, 8171 (2011).
  30. C. N. C. Lam, R. Wu, D. Li, M. L. Hair, and A. W. Neumann, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 96, 169 (2002).
  31. T. Onda, S. Shibuichi, N. Satoh, and K. Tsujii, Langmuir 12, 2125 (1996).
  32. S. Shibuichi, T. Onda, N. Satoh, and K. Tsujii, J. Phys. Chem. 100, 19512 (1996).
  33. T. L. Liu and C.-J. Kim, Science 346, 1096 (2014).
  34. A. Tuteja, W. Choi, J. M. Mabry., G. H. McKinley, and R. E. Cohen, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 18200 (2008).
  35. R. N. Wenzel, Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 988 (1936).
  36. Z. Yoshimitsu, A. Nakajima, T. Watanabe, and K. Hashimoto, Langmuir 18, 5818 (2002).
  37. F. Mugele and J.-C. Baret, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 17, R705 (2005).
  38. W. C. Nelson and C.-J. Kim, J. Adhesion Sci. Tech. 26, 1747 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation