- Access by Xinjiang University
Synchronization dynamics on the picosecond time scale in coupled Josephson junction neurons
Phys. Rev. E 95, 032220 – Published 22 March, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032220
Abstract
Conventional digital computation is rapidly approaching physical limits for speed and energy dissipation. Here we fabricate and test a simple neuromorphic circuit that models neuronal somas, axons, and synapses with superconducting Josephson junctions. The circuit models two mutually coupled excitatory neurons. In some regions of parameter space the neurons are desynchronized. In others, the Josephson neurons synchronize in one of two states, in-phase or antiphase. An experimental alteration of the delay and strength of the connecting synapses can toggle the system back and forth in a phase-flip bifurcation. Firing synchronization states are calculated >70 000 times faster than conventional digital approaches. With their speed and low energy dissipation (), this set of proof-of-concept experiments establishes Josephson junction neurons as a viable approach for improvements in neuronal computation as well as applications in neuromorphic computing.
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Article Text
References (28)
- S. Strogatz, Physica D 143, 1 (2000).
- J. Schemmel, D. Brüderle, K. Meier, and B. Ostendorf, in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, Vol. 1 (IEEE, 2007), pp. 3367–3370.
- P. Crotty, D. Schult, and K. Segall, Phys. Rev. E. 82, 011914 (2010).
- P. A. Merolla, J. V. Arthur, R. Alvarez-Icaza et al., Science 345, 668 (2014).
- J. Hasler and B. Marr, Front. Neurosci. 7, 118 (2013).
- G. Indiveri, B. Linares-Barranco, T. J. Hamilton et al., Front. Neurosci. 5, 73 (2011).
- M. R. Azghadi, N. Iannella, S. F. Al-Sarawi, G. Indiveri, and D. Abbott, Proc. IEEE 102, 717 (2014).
- E. Chicca, F. Stefanini, C. Bartolozzi, and G. Indiveri, Proc. IEEE 102, 1367 (2014).
- O. A. Mukhanov, IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 21, 760 (2011).
- C. Poon and K. Zhou, Front. Neurosci. 5, 108 (2011).
- D. S. Holmes, A. M. Kadin, and M. W. Johnson, Computer 48, 34 (2015).
- K. Segall, S. Guo, P. Crotty, D. Schult, and M. Miller, Physica B 455, 71 (2014).
- A. Prasad, S. K. Dana, R. Karnatak, J. Kurths, B. Blasius, and R. Ramaswamy, Chaos 18, 023111 (2008).
- B. M. Adhikari, A. Prasad, and M. Dhamala, Chaos 21, 023116 (2011).
- S. A. Campbell and I. Kobelevskiy, Discret. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 32, 2653 (2012).
- Y. Mizugaki, K. Nakajima, Y. Sawada, and T. Yamashita, Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 1712 (1994).
- A. Lukashenko and A. V. Ustinov, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 79, 014701 (2008).
- B. Akila and P. Muruganandam, Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 222, 917 (2013).
- B. Akila, K. Srinivasan, P. Muruganandam, and K. Murali, in Proceedings of the 2014 2nd International Conference on Devices, Circuits and Systems (ICDCS) (IEEE, 2014).
- J. Fell and N. Axmacher, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 12, 105 (2011).
- W. W. Lytton, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 9, 626 (2008).
- W. van Drongelen, H. Lee, M. Hereld, Z. Chen, F. Elsen, and R. Stevens, IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 13, 236 (2005).
- A. Destexhe, J. Neurosci. 18, 9099 (1998).
- R. Traub, D. Contreras, M. Cunningham, H. Murray, F. LeBeau, A. Roopun, A. Bibbig, W. Wilent, M. Higley, and M. Whittington, J. Neurophysiol. 93, 2194 (2005).
- P. Bunyk, K. Likharev, and D. Zinoviev, Int. J. High Speed Electron. Syst. 11, 257 (2001).
- R. Harris, A. J. Berkley, M. W. Johnson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 177001 (2007).
- M. H. Devoret and R. J. Schoelkopf, Science 339, 1169 (2013).
- J. D. Farmer, Physica D 4, 366 (1982).