Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Emergence of chimeras through induced multistability

Sangeeta Rani Ujjwal1, Nirmal Punetha2, Awadhesh Prasad3, and Ramakrishna Ramaswamy1

  • 1School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
  • 2Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Nöthnitzer Straße 38, D-01187 Dresden, Germany
  • 3Department of Physics and Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi 110007, India

Phys. Rev. E 95, 032203 – Published 7 March, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.95.032203

Abstract

Chimeras, namely coexisting desynchronous and synchronized dynamics, are formed in an ensemble of identically coupled identical chaotic oscillators when the coupling induces multiple stable attractors, and further when the basins of the different attractors are intertwined in a complex manner. When there is coupling-induced multistability, an ensemble of identical chaotic oscillators—with global coupling, or also under the influence of common noise or an external drive (chaotic, periodic, or quasiperiodic)—inevitably exhibits chimeric behavior. Induced multistability in the system leads to the formation of distinct subpopulations, one or more of which support synchronized dynamics, while in others the motion is asynchronous or incoherent. We study the mechanism for the emergence of such chimeric states, and we discuss the generality of our results.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (38)

  1. Y. Kuramoto and D. Battogtokh, Nonlinear Phenom. Complex Syst. (Minsk, Belarus) 5, 380 (2002).
  2. D. M. Abrams and S. H. Strogatz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 174102 (2004).
  3. A. E. Motter, S. A. Myers, M. Anghel, and T. Nishikawa, Nat. Phys. 9, 191 (2013).
  4. F. Dorfler, M. Chertkov, and F. Bullo, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 110, 2005 (2013).
  5. N. C. Rattenborg, C. J. Amlaner, and S. L. Lima, Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 24, 817 (2000).
  6. C. R. Laing and C. C. Chow, Neural Comput. 13, 1473 (2001); C. R. Laing, W. C. Troy, B. Gutkin, and G. B. Ermentrout, SIAM J. Appl. Math. 63, 62 (2002).
  7. M. J. Panaggio and D. M. Abrams, Nonlinearity 28, R67 (2015).
  8. G. C. Sethia, A. Sen, and F. M. Atay, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 144102 (2008).
  9. A. Yeldesbay, A. Pikovsky, and M. Rosenblum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 144103 (2014).
  10. S. R. Ujjwal and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rev. E 88, 032902 (2013); S. R. Ujjwal, N. Punetha, and R. Ramaswamy, ibid. 93, 012207 (2016).
  11. C. R. Laing, K. Rajendran, and I. G. Kevrekidis, Chaos 22, 013132 (2012).
  12. J. H. Sheeba, V. K. Chandrasekar, and M. Lakshmanan, Phys. Rev. E 79, 055203(R) (2009).
  13. H. Sakaguchi, Phys. Rev. E 73, 031907 (2006).
  14. C. R. Laing, Phys. Rev. E 81, 066221 (2010).
  15. N. Punetha, S. R. Ujjwal, F. M. Atay, and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022922 (2015).
  16. G. C. Sethia and A. Sen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 144101 (2014).
  17. M. Wolfrum and O. E. Omel'chenko, Phys. Rev. E 84, 015201(R) (2011).
  18. M. Wolfrum, O. E. Omel'chenko, S. Yanchuk, and Y. L. Maistrenko, Chaos 21, 013112 (2011).
  19. V. K. Chandrasekar, R. Suresh, D. V. Senthilkumar, and M. Lakshmanan, Europhys. Lett. 111, 60008 (2015).
  20. A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001).
  21. E. Ott, J. C. Alexander, I. Kan, J. C. Sommerer, and J. A. Yorke, Physica D 76, 384 (1994).
  22. E. N. Lorenz, J. Atmos. Sci. 20, 130 (1963).
  23. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990).
  24. S. Guan, C. H. Lai, and G. W. Wei, Phys. Rev. E 71, 036209 (2005); S. Guan, Y. C. Lai, and C. H. Lai, ibid. 73, 046210 (2006); M. Agrawal, A. Prasad, and R. Ramaswamy, ibid. 87, 042909 (2013).
  25. C. Spparow, The Lorenz Equations: Bifurcations, Chaos and Strange Attractors (Springer, New York, 1982).
  26. S. H. Strogatz, Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering (Perseus Books, New York, 1994).
  27. S. Camargo, R. L. Viana, and C. Anteneodo, Phys. Rev. E 85, 036207 (2012).
  28. T. W. Tanze, S. R. Ujjwal, and R. Ramaswamy (unpublished).
  29. N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995).
  30. M.-L. Chabanol, V. Hakim, and W.-J. Rappel, Physica D 103, 273 (1997).
  31. O. E. Rössler, Phys. Letts. A 57, 397 (1976).
  32. We have shown the results when the drive is given in z-variable only; qualitatively similar chimeras can be observed when coupling is in x- or y-variable or even in the case when driving is given in all three variables [28]. In all these cases, the mechanism that drives the system into multistability is similar but affects different parameters of the system depending upon in which direction the system is forced.
  33. S. R. Ujjwal, N. Punetha, R. Ramaswamy, M. Agrawal, and A. Prasad, Chaos 26, 063111 (2016).
  34. Z. Elhadj and J. C. Sprott, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos 20, 135 (2010).
  35. A. M. Rucklidge, J. Fluid Mech. 237, 209 (1992).
  36. S. Boccaletti, J. Kurths, G. Osipov, D. L. Valladares, and C. S. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 366, 1 (2002).
  37. A. N. Pisarchik and U. Feudel, Phys. Rep. 540, 167 (2014), and references therein.
  38. G. B. W. Söderlund, S. Sikström, J. M. Loftesnes, and E. J. Sonuga-Barke, Behav. Brain Func. 6, 1 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation