Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Evolutionary mixed games in structured populations: Cooperation and the benefits of heterogeneity

Marco A. Amaral1,*, Lucas Wardil2, Matjaž Perc3,4, and Jafferson K. L. da Silva1

  • 1Departamento de Física, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Caixa Postal 702, CEP 30161-970, Belo Horizonte-MG, Brazil
  • 2Departamento de Fisica, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, Ouro Preto, 35400-000, MG, Brazil
  • 3Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 160, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia
  • 4CAMTP–Center for Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Maribor, Krekova 2, SI-2000 Maribor, Slovenia

  • *marcoantonio.amaral@gmail.com

Phys. Rev. E 93, 042304 – Published 6 April, 2016

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.93.042304

Abstract

Evolutionary games on networks traditionally involve the same game at each interaction. Here we depart from this assumption by considering mixed games, where the game played at each interaction is drawn uniformly at random from a set of two different games. While in well-mixed populations the random mixture of the two games is always equivalent to the average single game, in structured populations this is not always the case. We show that the outcome is, in fact, strongly dependent on the distance of separation of the two games in the parameter space. Effectively, this distance introduces payoff heterogeneity, and the average game is returned only if the heterogeneity is small. For higher levels of heterogeneity the distance to the average game grows, which often involves the promotion of cooperation. The presented results support preceding research that highlights the favorable role of heterogeneity regardless of its origin, and they also emphasize the importance of the population structure in amplifying facilitators of cooperation.

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Article Text

References (95)

  1. J. Maynard Smith, Evolution and the Theory of Games (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982).
  2. J. W. Weibull, Evolutionary Game Theory (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995).
  3. J. Hofbauer and K. Sigmund, Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1998).
  4. M. Mesterton-Gibbons, An Introduction to Game-Theoretic Modelling, 2nd ed. (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001).
  5. M. A. Nowak, Evolutionary Dynamics (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2006).
  6. R. Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (Basic Books, New York, 1984).
  7. G. Szabó and G. Fáth, Phys. Rep. 446, 97 (2007).
  8. M. Perc and A. Szolnoki, BioSystems 99, 109 (2010).
  9. F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 098104 (2005).
  10. L. A. Imhof, D. Fudenberg, and M. A. Nowak, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10797 (2005).
  11. Z.-X. Wu, J.-Y. Guan, X.-J. Xu, and Y.-H. Wang, Physica A 379, 672 (2007).
  12. J. Gómez-Gardeñes, M. Campillo, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 108103 (2007).
  13. J. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. E 76, 021126 (2007).
  14. J. Poncela, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, L. M. Floría, and Y. Moreno, New J. Phys. 9, 184 (2007).
  15. W.-B. Du, H.-R. Zheng, and M.-B. Hu, Physica A 387, 3796 (2008).
  16. W.-B. Du, X.-B. Cao, and M.-B. Hu, Physica A 388, 5005 (2009).
  17. J. Poncela, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, L. M. Floría, Y. Moreno, and A. Sánchez, Europhys. Lett. 88, 38003 (2009).
  18. J. Tanimoto, M. Brede, and A. Yamauchi, Phys. Rev. E 85, 032101 (2012).
  19. A. Arenas, J. Camacho, J. A. Cuesta, and R. Requejo, J. Theor. Biol. 279, 113 (2011).
  20. J. Gómez-Gardeñes, I. Reinares, A. Arenas, and L. M. Floría, Sci. Rep. 2, 620 (2012).
  21. R. J. Requejo, J. Camacho, J. A. Cuesta, and A. Arenas, Phys. Rev. E 86, 026105 (2012).
  22. A. Szolnoki and M. Perc, Phys. Rev. E 89, 022804 (2014).
  23. J. Tanimoto, Phys. Rev. E 87, 062136 (2013).
  24. J. Tanimoto, Appl. Math. Comput. 263, 171 (2015).
  25. J. T. Matamalas, J. Poncela-Casasnovas, S. Gómez, and A. Arenas, Sci. Rep. 5, 9519 (2015).
  26. M. A. Javarone and A. E. Atzeni, Compu. Social Networks 2, 15 (2015).
  27. M. A. Javarone, Eur. Phys. J. B 89, 1 (2016).
  28. M. Sysi-Aho, J. Saramäki, J. Kertész, and K. Kaski, Eur. Phys. J. B 44, 129 (2005).
  29. W.-X. Wang, J. Ren, G. Chen, and B.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 74, 056113 (2006).
  30. W.-B. Du, X.-B. Cao, M.-B. Hu, and W.-X. Wang, Europhys. Lett. 87, 60004 (2009).
  31. X.-J. Chen and L. Wang, Europhys. Lett. 90, 38003 (2010).
  32. R. A. Laird, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 22, 1230039 (2012).
  33. R. A. Laird, Phys. Rev. E 88, 012105 (2013).
  34. L.-L. Jiang, M. Perc, and A. Szolnoki, PLoS ONE 8, e64677 (2013).
  35. E. O. Wilson, The Insect Societies (Harvard University Press, Harvard, 1971).
  36. A. F. Skutch, Condor 63, 198 (1961).
  37. M. A. Nowak and R. Highfield, SuperCooperators: Altruism, Evolution, and Why We Need Each Other to Succeed (Free Press, New York, 2011).
  38. M. A. Nowak, Science 314, 1560 (2006).
  39. W. D. Hamilton, J. Theor. Biol. 7, 1 (1964).
  40. R. L. Trivers, Q. Rev. Biol. 46, 35 (1971).
  41. R. Axelrod and W. D. Hamilton, Science 211, 1390 (1981).
  42. M. A. Nowak and R. M. May, Nature 359, 826 (1992).
  43. D. S. Wilson, Am. Nat. 111, 157 (1977).
  44. M. H. Vainstein and J. J. Arenzon, Phys. Rev. E 64, 051905 (2001).
  45. M. H. Vainstein, A. T. C. Silva, and J. J. Arenzon, J. Theor. Biol. 244, 722 (2007).
  46. Z. Wang, A. Szolnoki, and M. Perc, Sci. Rep. 2, 369 (2012).
  47. M. H. Vainstein and J. J. Arenzon, Physica A 394, 145 (2014).
  48. J. M. Pacheco, A. Traulsen, and M. A. Nowak, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 258103 (2006).
  49. J. M. Pacheco, A. Traulsen, and M. A. Nowak, J. Theor. Biol. 243, 437 (2006).
  50. Z.-X. Wu, X.-J. Xu, Z.-G. Huang, S.-J. Wang, and Y.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. E 74, 021107 (2006).
  51. E. Pestelacci and M. Tomassini, Lec. Not. Comput. Sci. 5199, 539 (2008).
  52. J. Tanimoto, Physica A 392, 2955 (2013).
  53. C. Biely, K. Dragosits, and S. Thurner, Physica D 228, 40 (2007).
  54. A. Cardillo, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, D. Vilone, and A. Sánchez, New J. Phys. 12, 103034 (2010).
  55. Q.-L. Dai and J.-Z. Yang, Chin. Phys. Lett. 27, 040201 (2010).
  56. M. Hetzer and D. Sornette, PLoS ONE 8, e54308 (2013).
  57. F. C. Santos, F. Pinheiro, T. Lenaerts, and J. M. Pacheco, J. Theor. Biol. 299, 88 (2012).
  58. M. Perc and A. Szolnoki, Phys. Rev. E 77, 011904 (2008).
  59. M. Perc and Z. Wang, PLoS ONE 5, e15117 (2011).
  60. H. Fort, Physica A 387, 1613 (2008).
  61. Y. Yao and S.-S. Chen, Physica A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 413, 432 (2014).
  62. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and G. Szabó, Eur. Phys. J. B 61, 505 (2008).
  63. P. Zhu and G. Wei, PLoS ONE 9, e95169 (2014).
  64. A. Szolnoki, J. Vukov, and G. Szabó, Phys. Rev. E 80, 056112 (2009).
  65. F. C. Santos, M. D. Santos, and J. M. Pacheco, Nature 454, 213 (2008).
  66. M. Iwata and E. Akiyama, Physica A 448, 224 (2015).
  67. K. Hashimoto, J. Theor. Biol. 241, 669 (2006).
  68. K. Hashimoto, J. Theor. Biol. 345, 70 (2014).
  69. L. Wardil and J. K. L. da Silva, Chaos Solitons Fractals 56, 160 (2013).
  70. R. Cressman, A. Gaunersdorfer, and J.-F. Wen, Int. Game Theory Rev. 02, 67 (2000).
  71. Z. Wang, A. Szolnoki, and M. Perc, Phys. Rev. E 90, 032813 (2014).
  72. S. Boccaletti, G. Bianconi, R. Criado, C. I. del Genio, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, M. Romance, I. Sendiña-Nadal, Z. Wang, and M. Zanin, Phys. Rep. 544, 1 (2014).
  73. M. D. Santos, S. N. Dorogovtsev, and J. F. F. Mendes, Sci. Rep. 4, 4436 (2014).
  74. B. Wang, Z. Pei, and L. Wang, Europhys. Lett. 107, 58006 (2014).
  75. A. Szolnoki and M. Perc, Europhys. Lett. 108, 28004 (2014).
  76. M. A. Amaral, L. Wardil, and J. K. L. da Silva, J. Phys. A 48, 445002 (2015).
  77. M. R. Frean, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 257, 75 (1994).
  78. B. Huberman and N. Glance, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90, 7716 (1993).
  79. P. L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E 63, 066123 (2001).
  80. R. Albert and A.-L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
  81. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
  82. H. Ohtsuki and M. A. Nowak, J. Theor. Biol. 243, 86 (2006).
  83. F. C. Santos and J. M. Pacheco, J. Evol. Biol. 19, 726 (2006).
  84. L. Wardil and J. K. L. da Silva, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 44, 345101 (2011).
  85. N. Masuda, Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 1815 (2007).
  86. A. Szolnoki, M. Perc, and Z. Danku, Physica A 387, 2075 (2008).
  87. M. O. Jackson and A. Wolinsky, J. Econ. Theor. 71, 44 (1996).
  88. K. Sigmund, Trends Ecol. Evol. 22, 593 (2007).
  89. F. C. Santos, J. F. Rodrigues, and J. M. Pacheco, Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 51 (2006).
  90. M. Nowak and K. Sigmund, Acta Appl. Math. 20, 247 (1990).
  91. G. Szabó, J. Vukov, and A. Szolnoki, Phys. Rev. E 72, 047107 (2005).
  92. C.-L. Tang, W.-X. Wang, X. Wu, and B.-H. Wang, Eur. Phys. J. B 53, 411 (2006).
  93. C. Lei, T. W. J.-Y. Jia, R. Cong, and L. Wang, Physica A 389, 4708 (2010).
  94. L. Sun, H.-X. Yang, S.-M. Chen, and Y.-S. Chen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 24, 1250089 (2013).
  95. W.-J. Yuan and C.-Y. Xia, PLoS ONE 9, e91012 (2014).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation