Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Quantum transitions driven by one-bond defects in quantum Ising rings

Massimo Campostrini1, Andrea Pelissetto2, and Ettore Vicari1

  • 1Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università di Pisa and INFN, Largo Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy
  • 2Dipartimento di Fisica di “Sapienza” Università di Roma and INFN, Sezione di Roma I, I-00185 Roma, Italy

Phys. Rev. E 91, 042123 – Published 20 April, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042123

Abstract

We investigate quantum scaling phenomena driven by lower-dimensional defects in quantum Ising-like models. We consider quantum Ising rings in the presence of a bond defect. In the ordered phase, the system undergoes a quantum transition driven by the bond defect between a magnet phase, in which the gap decreases exponentially with increasing size, and a kink phase, in which the gap decreases instead with a power of the size. Close to the transition, the system shows a universal scaling behavior, which we characterize by computing, either analytically or numerically, scaling functions for the low-level energy differences and the two-point correlation function. We discuss the implications of these results for the nonequilibrium dynamics in the presence of a slowly varying parallel magnetic field h, when going across the first-order quantum transition at h=0.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. S. Sachdev, Quantum Phase Transitions (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1999).
  2. A. Polkovnikov and V. Gritsev, Nat. Phys. 4, 477 (2008).
  3. A. Polkovnikov, K. Sengupta, A. Silva, and M. Vengalattore, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863 (2011).
  4. W. H. Zurek, Nature 317, 505 (1985).
  5. W. H. Zurek, U. Dorner, and P. Zoller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 105701 (2005); J. Dziarmaga, ibid. 95, 245701 (2005); A. Polkovnikov, Phys. Rev. B 72, 161201(R) (2005); A. Chandran, A. Erez, S. S. Gubser, and S. L. Sondhi, ibid. 86, 064304 (2012).
  6. R. Z. Bariev, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 77, 1217 (1979) [Sov. Phys. JETP 50, 613 (1979)].
  7. F. Igloi, I. Peschel, and L. Turban, Adv. Phys. 42, 683 (1993).
  8. E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Ann. Phys. (NY) 16, 407 (1961).
  9. Numerical computations are similar to those reported in the literature [see, e.g., A. P. Young and H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 53, 8486 (1996)], but with an additional complication for ζ0: the ground state corresponds to the first excited state of the fermionic model.
  10. We present several analytic results. Derivations will be reported elsewhere.
  11. P. Pfeuty, Ann. Phys. 57, 79 (1970).
  12. J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 3296 (1986).
  13. M. N. Barber and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. B 36, 2024 (1987).
  14. G. G. Cabrera and R. Jullien, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 393 (1986); Phys. Rev. B 35, 7062 (1987).
  15. The scaling functions behave as D1(x)4/x and D2(x)3+12/x for x,D1(x)8x2ex/π2 and D2(x)x2/π2 for x+. Moreover, D1(x)12x/π2 and D2(x)1+2x/π2 for x0+.
  16. Notice that the scaling behavior of G(0,) cannot be derived from Eq. (12).
  17. In general, one would also expect an argument rescaling; we have defined ηs in such a way to make the rescaling factor equal to 1 for all values of g.
  18. R. Z. Bariev and I. Peschel, Phys. Lett. A 153, 166 (1991).
  19. M. Campostrini, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. B 89, 094516 (2014).
  20. A. Y. Kitaev, Phys.-Usp. 44, 131 (2001).
  21. J. Alicea, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 076501 (2012).
  22. We numerically checked that the universality of the scaling phenomena driven by one defect extends to the XY ring, HXY=i=1Hi,i+1gi=σi(3)ζH,, where Hi,j=1+γ2σi(1)σj(1)+1γ2σi(2)σj(2), when varying γ around γ=1 (e.g., for g=1/2 and γ=3/4). Different behaviors are instead observed at small values of γ (e.g., g=1/2 and γ=1/2). This is related to the fact that the low-energy spectrum qualitatively changes when |γ|<1g. If γ is small, the kink phase no longer exists (the ground-state properties of the magnet phase for ζ>ζc remains stable). For ζ=1 (ABC), the gap behaves as ΔLa/L2 with a=(g1+γ2)π2/(1g), which vanishes when γ1g0+. For γ>1g the scaling variable Eq. (11) is replaced by ζs=(1g)(ζ+1)L/(g1+γ2).
  23. H. De Raedt, S. Miyashita, K. Saito, D. García-Pablos, and N. García, Phys. Rev. B 56, 11761 (1997).
  24. M. Campostrini, J. Nespolo, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 070402 (2014).
  25. M. Campostrini, J. Nespolo, A. Pelissetto, and E. Vicari, Phys. Rev. E 91, 022108 (2015).
  26. The same arguments can be applied to the KZ problem driven by the parallel field h(t)=t/t0 at the order-disorder continuous transition (g=1), which belongs to the 2D Ising universality class with z=1 and yh=2η/2=15/8. They give τ=t0z/(z+yh)=t08/23. This provides the scaling behavior for the KZ problem driven by the parallel magnetic field. The scaling of the KZ problem when varying the transverse field g across g=1 is obtained by replacing yh with yg=1/ν=1. See F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. G. Green, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. E 81, 020101(R) (2010); M. Kolodrubetz, B. K. Clark, and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 015701 (2012).
  27. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, and M. Sipser, arXiv:quant-ph/0001106.
  28. E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, S. Gutmann, J. Lapan, A. Lundgreen, and D. Preda, Science 292, 472 (2001).
  29. T. Kadowaki and H. Nishimori, Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355 (1998).
  30. I. Bloch, Nature 453, 1016 (2008).
  31. M. H. S. Amin and V. Choi, Phys. Rev. A 80, 062326 (2009).
  32. A. P. Young, S. Knysh, and V. N. Smelyanskiy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 020502 (2010).
  33. C. R. Laumann, R. Moessner, A. Scardicchio, and S. L. Sondhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 030502 (2012).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation