- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Editors' Suggestion
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stochastic thermodynamics of Langevin systems under time-delayed feedback control: Second-law-like inequalities

M. L. Rosinberg1,*, T. Munakata2, and G. Tarjus1

  • 1Laboratoire de Physique Théorique de la Matière Condensée, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, CNRS UMR 7600, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France
  • 2Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics, Graduate School of Informatics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan

  • *Email address: mlr@lptmc.jussieu.fr
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 91, 042114 – Published 14 April, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.042114

Abstract

Response lags are generic to almost any physical system and often play a crucial role in the feedback loops present in artificial nanodevices and biological molecular machines. In this paper, we perform a comprehensive study of small stochastic systems governed by an underdamped Langevin equation and driven out of equilibrium by a time-delayed continuous feedback control. In their normal operating regime, these systems settle in a nonequilibrium steady state in which work is permanently extracted from the surrounding heat bath. By using the Fokker-Planck representation of the dynamics, we derive a set of second-law-like inequalities that provide bounds to the rate of extracted work. These inequalities involve additional contributions characterizing the reduction of entropy production due to the continuous measurement process. We also show that the non-Markovian nature of the dynamics requires a modification of the basic relation linking dissipation to the breaking of time-reversal symmetry at the level of trajectories. The modified relation includes a contribution arising from the acausal character of the reverse process. This, in turn, leads to another second-law-like inequality. We illustrate the general formalism with a detailed analytical and numerical study of a harmonic oscillator driven by a linear feedback, which describes actual experimental setups.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (135)

  1. See, e.g., A. C. Barato and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 090601 (2014), and references therein.
  2. H. S. Leff and A. F. Rex (eds.), Maxwell's Demon 2: Entropy, Classical and Quantum Information, Computing (Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2002).
  3. K. Maruyama, F. Nori, and V. Vedral, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1 (2009).
  4. T. Sagawa and M Ueda, in Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics of Small Systems: Fluctuation Relations and Beyond, edited by R. Klages, W. Just, and C. Jarzynski (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013).
  5. G. Cerefolini, Nanoscale Devices (Springer, Berlin, 2009).
  6. A. Alemany, M. Ribezzi, and F. Ritort, in Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics of Small Systems: Fluctuation Relations and Beyond, edited by R. Klages, W. Just, and C. Jarzynski (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2013).
  7. K. H. Kim and H. Qian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 120602 (2004); Phys. Rev. E 75, 022102 (2007).
  8. H. Touchette and S. Lloyd, Physica A 331, 140 (2004).
  9. T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 080403 (2008).
  10. F. J. Cao and M. Feito, Phys. Rev. E 79, 041118 (2009).
  11. T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 090602 (2010).
  12. J. M. Horowitz and S. Vaikuntanathan, Phys. Rev. E 82, 061120 (2010).
  13. M. Ponmurugan, Phys. Rev. E 82, 031129 (2010).
  14. Y. Fujitani and H. Suzuki, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 79, 104003 (2010).
  15. S. Toyabe, T. Sagawa, M. Ueda, E. Muneyuki, and M. Sano, Nat. Phys. 6, 988 (2010).
  16. D. Abreu and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 030601 (2012).
  17. T. Sagawa and M. Ueda, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021104 (2012).
  18. S. Lahiri, S. Rana, and A. M. Jayannavar, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 45, 065002 (2012).
  19. C. Jarzynski, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 329 (2011).
  20. U. Seifert, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75, 126001 (2012).
  21. J. Bechhoefer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 783 (2005).
  22. See, e.g., G. A. Bocharov and F. A. Rihan, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 125, 183 (2000), and references therein.
  23. A. S. Ribeiro, Math. Biosci. 223, 1 (2010).
  24. M. A. Arbib (ed.), The Handbook of Brain Theory and Neural Networks (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002).
  25. J. Milton et al., Chaos 19, 026110 (2009).
  26. M. Feito and F. J. Cao, Phys. Rev. E. 76, 061113 (2007); Phys. A (Amsterdam, Neth.) 387, 4553 (2008).
  27. E. M. Craig, B. R. Long, J. M. R. Parrondo, and H. Linke, Eur. Phys. Lett. 81, 10002 (2008).
  28. B. J. Lopez, N. J. Kuwada, E. M. Craig, B. R. Long, and H. Linke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 220601 (2008).
  29. S. A. M. Loos, R. Gernert, and S. H. L. Klapp, Phys. Rev. E 89, 052136 (2014).
  30. E. Schöll, P. Hövel, V. Flunkert, and M. A. Dahlem, in Complex Time-Delay Systems, edited by F. Atay (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  31. M. L. Rosinberg, G. Tarjus, and T. Munakata (unpublished).
  32. S. A. Mohammed, Stochastic Functional Differential Equations (Pitman Advanced Publishing Program, Boston, 1984).
  33. X. Mao, Stochastic Differential Equations and their Applications, 2nd ed. (Horwood, Chichester, UK, 2008).
  34. A. Longtin, in Complex Time-Delay Systems, edited by F. Atay (Springer, Berlin, 2010).
  35. T. Munakata and M. L. Rosinberg, J. Stat. Mech. (2012) P05010.
  36. T. Munakata and M. L. Rosinberg, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P06014.
  37. J.-C. Delvenne and H. Sandberg, Physica D 267, 123 (2014).
  38. H. Sandberg, J.-C. Delvenne, N. J. Newton, and S. K. Mitter, Phys. Rev. E 90, 042119 (2014).
  39. J. M. Horowitz and H. Sandberg, New J. Phys. 16, 125007 (2014).
  40. T. Munakata and M. L. Rosinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 180601 (2014).
  41. J. Kurchan, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 31, 3719 (1998).
  42. G. E. Crooks, J. Stat. Phys. 90, 1481 (1998); Phys. Rev. E 60, 2721 (1999); 61, 2361 (2000).
  43. L. Lebowitz and H. Spohn, J. Stat. Phys. 95, 333 (1999).
  44. C. Maes and K. Netocÿny, J. Stat. Phys. 110, 269 (2003); C. Maes, Sémin. Poincaré 2, 29 (2003).
  45. P. Gaspard, J. Stat. Phys. 117, 599 (2004).
  46. M. Poot and H. S. J. van der Zant, Phys. Rep. 511, 273 (2012).
  47. M. Pinard, P. F. Cohadon, T. Briant, and A. Heidmann, Phys. Rev. A 63, 013808 (2000).
  48. K. H. Lee, T. G. McRae, G. I. Harris, J. Knittel, and W. P. Bowen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 123604 (2010).
  49. M. Montinaro et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 101, 133104 (2012).
  50. J. V. Koski, V. F. Maisi, T. Sagawa, and J. P. Pekola, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 030601 (2014).
  51. D. Mandal and C. Jarzynski, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109, 11641 (2012).
  52. D. Mandal, H. T. Quan, and C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 030602 (2013).
  53. P. Strasberg, G. Schaller, T. Brandes, and M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 040601 (2013).
  54. D. Hartich, A. C. Barato, and U. Seifert, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P02016.
  55. J. M. Horowitz and M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. X 4, 031015 (2014).
  56. E. R. Kay, D. A. Leigh, and F. Zerbetto, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 46, 72 (2007).
  57. K. Patanarapeelert, T. D. Frank, R. Friedrich, P. J. Beek, and I. M. Tang, Phys. Rev. E 73, 021901 (2006).
  58. T. Munakata, S. Iwama, and M. Kimizuka, Phys. Rev. E 79, 031104 (2009).
  59. H. Jiang, T. Xiao, and Z. Hou, Phys. Rev. E 83, 061144 (2011).
  60. S. Liang, D. Medich, D. M. Czajkowsky, S. Sheng, J. Yuan, and Z. Shao, Ultramicroscopy 84, 119 (2000).
  61. F. Zanponi, F. Bonetto, L. F. Cugliandolo, and J. Kurchan, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P09013.
  62. T. Mai and A. Dhar, Phys. Rev. E 75, 061101 (2007).
  63. T. Speck and U. Seifert, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) L09002.
  64. T. Ohkuma and T. Ohta, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P10010.
  65. A. V. Chechkin and R. Klages, J. Stat. Mech. (2009) L03002.
  66. C. Aron, G. Biroli, and L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P11018.
  67. M. Esposito and K. Lindenberg, Phys. Rev. E 77, 051119 (2008).
  68. D. Andrieux and P. Gaspard, J. Stat. Mech. (2008) P11007.
  69. C. Maes, K. Netocný, and B. Wynants, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 365002 (2009).
  70. R. J. Harris and H. Touchette, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 42, 342001 (2009).
  71. R. García-García, Phys. Rev. E 86, 031117 (2012).
  72. S. Guillouzic, I. L'Heureux, and A. Longtin, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3970 (1999); 61, 4906 (2000).
  73. T. D. Frank, Phys. Rev. E 71, 031106 (2005).
  74. L. S. Tsimring and A. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 250602 (2001).
  75. E. A. Novikov, Zh. Eksp. Theor. Fiz. 47, 1919 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 20, 1290 (1965)].
  76. T. D. Frank, Phys. Rev. E 72, 011112 (2005).
  77. H. Risken, The Fokker-Planck Equation—Methods of Solution and Applications (Springer, Berlin, 1989).
  78. L. Onsager and S. Machlup, Phys. Rev. 91, 1505 (1953); S. Machlup and L. Onsager, ibid. 91, 1512 (1953).
  79. J. Zinn-Justin, Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, 4th ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 2002).
  80. V. Y. Chernyak, M. Chertkov, and C. Jarzyinski, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) P08001.
  81. U. Küchler and B. Mensch, Stochastics Stochastic Rep. 40, 23 (1992).
  82. T. D. Frank, Phys. Rev. E 66, 011914 (2002).
  83. K. Sekimoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66, 1234 (1997); Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 130, 17 (1998).
  84. K. Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics, Lecture Notes in Physics 799 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010).
  85. U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 040602 (2005).
  86. C. Van den Broeck and M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. E 82, 011144 (2010).
  87. T. Tomé and M. J. de Oliveira, Phys. Rev. E 82, 021120 (2010).
  88. S. Rahav and C. Jarzynski, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P09012.
  89. A. Gomez-Marin, J. M. R. Parrondo, and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. E. 78, 011107 (2008).
  90. A. E. Allahverdyan, D. Janzing, and G. Mahler, Stat. Mech. (2009) P09011.
  91. J. M. Horowitz and C. Jarzynski, Phys. Rev. E 79, 021106 (2009).
  92. A. Crisanti, A. Puglisi, and D. Villamaina, Phys. Rev. E 85, 061127 (2012).
  93. M. Esposito, Phys. Rev. E 85, 041125 (2012).
  94. J. Mehl, B. Lander, C. Bechinger, V. Blickle, and U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 220601 (2012).
  95. S. Bo and A. Celani, J. Stat. Phys. 154, 1325 (2014).
  96. M. Borrelli, J. V. Koski, S. Maniscalco, and J. P. Pekola, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012145 (2015).
  97. S. Ito and T. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 180603 (2013).
  98. G. Diana and M. Esposito, J. Stat. Mech. (2014) P04010.
  99. N. Shiraishi and T. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. E 91, 012130 (2015).
  100. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 37, 405 (1931); 38, 2265 (1932).
  101. S. R. de Groot and P. Mazur, Non Equilibrium Thermodynamics (Dover, New York, 1984).
  102. A. Imparato and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. E 74, 026106 (2006).
  103. R. Kawai, J. M. R. Parrondo, and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 080602 (2007).
  104. E. Roldán and J. M. R. Parrondo, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031129 (2012).
  105. S. Marzen and J. P. Crutchfield, Entropy 16, 4713 (2014).
  106. T. Schreiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 461 (2000).
  107. S. Ito and T. Sagawa, arXiv:1406.5810.
  108. T. Munakata and M. Kamiyabu, Eur. Phys. J. B 53, 239 (2006).
  109. F. Tostevin and P. Rein ten Wolde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 218101 (2009).
  110. A. Vinante, M. Bignotto, M. Bonaldi, M. Cerdonio, L. Conti, P. Falferi, N. Liguori, S. Longo, R. Mezzena, A. Ortolan, G. A. Prodi, F. Salemi, L. Taffarello, G. Vedovato, S. Vitale, and J.-P. Zendri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 033601 (2008).
  111. M. Bonaldi, L. Conti, P. De Gregorio, L. Rondoni, G. Vedovato, A. Vinante, M. Bignotto, M. Cerdonio, P. Falferi, N. Liguori, S. Longo, R. Mezzena, A. Ortolan, G. A. Prodi, F. Salemi, L. Taffarello, S. Vitale, and J.-P. Zendri, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 010601 (2009).
  112. A. Vinante, M. Bonaldi, R. Mezzena, and P. Falferi, Eur. Phys. Lett. 92, 34005 (2010).
  113. We use here the two-sided convention for the spectral densities, in contrast with the one-sided convention often considered in experimental papers, for instance in [114].
  114. M. Poggio, C. L. Degen, H. J. Mamin, and D. Rugar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 017201 (2007).
  115. S. F. Nørrelykke and H. Flyvbjerg, Phys. Rev. E 83, 041103 (2011).
  116. M. I. Dykman and M. A. Krivoglaz, Sov. Sci. Rev. A Phys. 5, 265 (1984).
  117. T. D. Frank, P. J. Beek, and R. Friedrich, Phys. Rev. E 68, 021912 (2003).
  118. S. A. Campbell, J. Bélair, T. Ohira, and J. Milton, J. Dyn. Diff. Eqs. 7, 213 (1995); Chaos 5, 640 (1995).
  119. K. L. Cooke and Z. Grossman, J. Math. Anal. App. 86, 592 (1982).
  120. C. Genes, D. Vitali, P. Tombesi, S. Gigan, and M. Aspelmeyer, Phys. Rev. A 77, 033804 (2008).
  121. A. D. Poularikas, The Handbook of Formulas and Tables for Signal Processing (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1999).
  122. This can be explicitly checked for the Markovian “molecular refrigerator” model studied in [35] and will be further discussed in more detail in a subsequent paper [31].
  123. Equation (155) differs from Eq. (18) in [40], which involves G(s)=[s(s+1/Q0)]−1 instead of χg=0(s). The two equations are equivalent except when the Bromwich contour has to be taken on the left-hand side of the complex plane. In this case, Eq. (18) in [40] does not yield the correct result for ṠJ. Moreover, this equation is not suited for the small-g expansion.
  124. H. W. Bode, Network Analysis and Feedback Amplifier Design (Van Nostrand, Princeton, NJ 1945).
  125. C. Corduneanu, Functional Equations with Causal Operators (Taylor & Francis, London, New York, 2002).
  126. R. Corless et al., On the Lambert W Function, Advances in Computational Mathematics (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, New York, 1996).
  127. This can be understood by rewriting the Langevin equation (95) as mv̇t=−(k−k′)xt−k′∫t−τtvsds−γvt+2γTξt. Then, as k′→k, the Brownian entity becomes unconfined and the Langevin equation only describes the stochastic dynamics of the velocity.
  128. S. Joubaud, N. B. Garnier, and S. Ciliberto, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P09018.
  129. J. R. Gomez-Solano, L. Bellon, A. Petrosyan, and S. Ciliberto, Europhys. Lett. 89, 60003 (2010).
  130. T. D. Frank and P. J. Beek, Phys. Rev. E 64, 021917 (2001).
  131. A. A. Budini and M. O. Cáceres, Phys. Rev. E 70, 046104 (2004).
  132. H. S. Wio, P. Colet, M. San Miguel, L. Pesquera, and M. A. Rodriguez, Phys. Rev. A 40, 7312 (1989).
  133. J. L. Doob, Ann. Math. 43, 351 (1942).
  134. L. Pesquera, M. A. Rodriguez, and E. Santos, Phys. Lett. A 94, 287 (1983).
  135. We recall that W is the inverse function of f(W)=WeW and that W0(x) and W−1(x) are the two real branches satisfying −1≤W(x) and W(x)≤−1, respectively. These two branches coalesce at x=−1/e [126].

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 91, 042114– Published 14 April, 2015
  • Received 19 January 2015

©2015 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation