Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Anomalous scaling in an age-dependent branching model

Stephanie Keller-Schmidt1, Murat Tuğrul2, Víctor M. Eguíluz3, Emilio Hernández-García3, and Konstantin Klemm1,4,5,6

  • 1Bioinformatics, Institute of Computer Science, University Leipzig, Härtelstr. 16-18, 04107 Leipzig, Germany
  • 2IST Austria, Am Campus 1, 3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria
  • 3IFISC (CSIC-UIB), Instituto de Física Interdisciplinar y Sistemas Complejos, E-07122 Palma de Mallorca, Spain
  • 4Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Vienna, Währingerstraße 29, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 5Theoretical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Währingerstraße 17, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 6School of Science and Technology, Nazarbayev University, Kabanbay Batyr Ave. 53, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan

Phys. Rev. E 91, 022803 – Published 2 February, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022803

Abstract

We introduce a one-parametric family of tree growth models, in which branching probabilities decrease with branch age τ as τα. Depending on the exponent α, the scaling of tree depth with tree size n displays a transition between the logarithmic scaling of random trees and an algebraic growth. At the transition (α=1) tree depth grows as (logn)2. This anomalous scaling is in good agreement with the trend observed in evolution of biological species, thus providing a theoretical support for age-dependent speciation and associating it to the occurrence of a critical point.

Article Text

References (44)

  1. I. Rodriguez-Iturbe and A. Rinaldo, Fractal River Basins: Chance and Self-Organization (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).
  2. G. B. West, J. H. Brown, and B. J. Enquist, Science 276, 122 (1997).
  3. T. Halpin-Healy and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995).
  4. E. Brunet, B. Derrida, and D. Simon, Phys. Rev. E 78, 061102 (2008).
  5. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 128701 (2005).
  6. K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, and M. San Miguel, Physica D 224, 149 (2006).
  7. M. M. Geipel, C. J. Tessone, and F. Schweitzer, Eur. Phys. J. B 71, 641 (2009).
  8. R. Gray and Q. Atkinson, Nature (London) 426, 435 (2003).
  9. B. Derrida, S. C. Manrubia, and D. H. Zanette, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1987 (1999).
  10. M. Serva, J. Stat. Mech. (2005) P07011.
  11. E. A. Herrada, C. J. Tessone, K. Klemm, V. M. Eguíluz, E. Hernández-García, and C. M. Duarte, PLoS ONE 3, e2757 (2008).
  12. A. Herrada, V. M. Eguíluz, E. Hernández-García, and C. M. Duarte, BMC Evol. Biol. 11, 155 (2011).
  13. E. Brunet and B. Derrida, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P01006.
  14. V. Sood, M. Mathieu, A. Shreim, P. Grassberger, and M. Paczuski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 178701 (2010).
  15. J. Felsenstein, Inferring Phylogenies (Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, 2003).
  16. M. J. Sanderson, M. J. Donoghue, W. Piel, and T. Eriksson, Am. J. Bot. 81, 183 (1994), data downloaded on June 30, 2007, http://www.treebase.org.
  17. S. Whelan, P. I. W. de Bakker, E. Quevillon, N. Rodriguez, and N. Goldman, Nucleic Acids Res. 34, D327 (2006), data downloaded on May 27, 2008, http://www.ebi.ac.uk/goldman-srv/pandit/.
  18. T. E. Harris, The Theory of Branching Processes (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, and Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1963).
  19. M. Simkin and V. Roychowdhury, Phys. Rep. 502, 1 (2011).
  20. I. Pinelis, Proc. R. Soc. London B 270, 1425 (2003).
  21. M. G. Blum and O. François, Syst. Biol. 55, 685 (2006).
  22. G. R. Jones, Syst. Biol. 60, 735 (2011).
  23. G. U. Yule, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 213, 21 (1925).
  24. S. Pompei, V. Loreto, and F. Tria, PLoS ONE 7, e44849 (2012).
  25. A. Mooers and S. B. Heard, Q. Rev. Biol. 72, 31 (1997).
  26. F. A. Matsen, Syst. Biol. 55, 652 (2006).
  27. P. M. Agapow and A. Purvis, Syst. Biol. 51, 866 (2002).
  28. M. Sackin, Syst. Zool. 21, 225 (1972).
  29. M. Stich and S. C. Manrubia, Eur. Phys. J. B 70, 583 (2009).
  30. S. Keller-Schmidt and K. Klemm, Adv. Complex Syst. 15, 1250043 (2012).
  31. D. Aldous, in Random Discrete Structures, edited by D. Aldous and R. Pemantle (Springer, New York, 1996), pp. 1–18.
  32. D. Aldous, Stat. Sci. 16, 23 (2001).
  33. D. J. Ford, Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2006, arXiv:math/0511246v1 [math.PR].
  34. J. Masel and M. L. Siegal, Trends Genet. 25, 395 (2009).
  35. S. Manrubia and J. A. Cuesta, J. R. Soc. Interface 12, 20141010 (2014).
  36. P. Sibani, M. R. Schmidt, and P. Alstrøm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 2055 (1995).
  37. M. Newman and P. Sibani, Proc. R. Soc. London B 266, 1593 (1999).
  38. P. De Los Rios, Europhys. Lett. 56, 898 (2001).
  39. E. Hernández-García, M. Tuğrul, E. A. Herrada, V. M. Eguíluz, and K. Klemm, Int. J. Bif. Chaos 20, 805 (2010).
  40. N. Becker and P. Sibani, Europhys. Lett. 105, 18005 (2014).
  41. P. Bak and K. Sneppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 4083 (1993).
  42. R. V. Solé and S. C. Manrubia, Phys. Rev. E 54, R42 (1996).
  43. T. Barraclough and S. Nee, Trends Ecol. Evol. 16, 391 (2001).
  44. C. Venditti, A. Meade, and M. Pagel, Nature (London) 463, 349 (2010).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation