- Editors' Suggestion
- Access by Xinjiang University
Emergence of limit-periodic order in tiling models
Phys. Rev. E 90, 012136 – Published 29 July, 2014Erratum Phys. Rev. E 93, 029902 (2016)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.90.012136
Abstract
A two-dimensional (2D) lattice model defined on a triangular lattice with nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor interactions based on the Taylor-Socolar monotile is known to have a limit-periodic ground state. The system reaches that state during a slow quench through an infinite sequence of phase transitions. We study the model as a function of the strength of the next-nearest-neighbor interactions and introduce closely related 3D models with only nearest-neighbor interactions that exhibit limit-periodic phases. For models with no next-nearest-neighbor interactions of the Taylor-Socolar type, there is a large degenerate class of ground states, including crystalline patterns and limit-periodic ones, but a slow quench still yields the limit-periodic state. For the Taylor-Socolar lattic model, we present calculations of the diffraction pattern for a particular decoration of the tile that permits exact expressions for the amplitudes and identify domain walls that slow the relaxation times in the ordered phases. For one of the 3D models, we show that the phase transitions are first order, with equilibrium structures that can be more complex than in the 2D case, and we include a proof of aperiodicity for a geometrically simple tile with only nearest-neighbor matching rules.
Erratum
Erratum: Emergence of limit-periodic order in tiling models [Phys. Rev. E 90, 012136 (2014)]
Article Text
References (27)
- D. Shechtman, I. Blech, D. Gratias, and J. W. Cahn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1951 (1984).
- D. Levine and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2477 (1984).
- D. P. DiVincenzo and P. J. Steinhardt, Quasicrystals: The State of the Art, 2nd ed., Direction in Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 16 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999).
- R. Penrose, Bull. Inst. Math. Appl. 10, 266 (1974).
- J. E. S. Socolar and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. B 34, 617 (1986).
- A. Katz, Commun. Math. Phys. 118, 263 (1988).
- L. Levitov, Commun. Math. Phys. 119, 627 (1988).
- J. E. Socolar, Commun. Math. Phys. 129, 599 (1990).
- P. Kalugin, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38, 3115 (2005).
- C. Goodman-Strauss, Ann. Math. 147, 181 (1998).
- T. Fernique and N. Ollinger, in Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Cellular Automata “Journées Automates Cellulaires,” edited by J. Kari (Turku Center for Computer Science, Turku, Finland, 2010), pp. 100–110.
- R. Berger, Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 66, 1 (1966).
- R. Robinson, Inventiones Math. 12, 177 (1971).
- C. Goodman-Strauss, Eur. J. Combin. 20, 375 (1999).
- J. Miȩkisz, J. Stat. Phys. 58, 1137 (1990).
- J. E. S. Socolar and J. M. Taylor, J. Combin. Theor.: Ser. A 118, 2207 (2011).
- J. E. S. Socolar and J. M. Taylor, Math. Intell. 34, 18 (2012).
- T. W. Byington and J. E. S. Socolar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 045701 (2012).
- L. J. Shaw, V. Elser, and C. L. Henley, Phys. Rev. B 43, 3423 (1991).
- M. Widom, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2094 (1993).
- N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, and A. Teller, J. Chem. Phys. 21, 1087 (1953).
- M. E. J. Newman and G. T. Barkema, Monte Carlo Methods in Statistical Physics (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1999).
- D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation (Academic Press, San Diego, 2001).
- A. Bray, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 23, L67 (1990).
- C. Godreche, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 22, L1163 (1989).
- M. Baake and U. Grimm, Philos. Mag. 91, 2661 (2011).
- S. Akiyama and J.-Y. Lee, Osaka J. Math. 51, 597 (2014).