- Access by Xinjiang University
Probabilistic physical characteristics of phase transitions at highway bottlenecks: Incommensurability of three-phase and two-phase traffic-flow theories
Phys. Rev. E 89, 052807 – Published 13 May, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.052807
Abstract
Physical features of induced phase transitions in a metastable free flow at an on-ramp bottleneck in three-phase and two-phase cellular automaton (CA) traffic-flow models have been revealed. It turns out that at given flow rates at the bottleneck, to induce a moving jam (FJ transition) in the metastable free flow through the application of a time-limited on-ramp inflow impulse, in both two-phase and three-phase CA models the same critical amplitude of the impulse is required. If a smaller impulse than this critical one is applied, neither FJ transition nor other phase transitions can occur in the two-phase CA model. We have found that in contrast with the two-phase CA model, in the three-phase CA model, if the same smaller impulse is applied, then a phase transition from free flow to synchronized flow (FS transition) can be induced at the bottleneck. This explains why rather than the FJ transition, in the three-phase theory traffic breakdown at a highway bottleneck is governed by an FS transition, as observed in real measured traffic data. None of two-phase traffic-flow theories incorporates an FS transition in a metastable free flow at the bottleneck that is the main feature of the three-phase theory. On the one hand, this shows the incommensurability of three-phase and two-phase traffic-flow theories. On the other hand, this clarifies why none of the two-phase traffic-flow theories can explain the set of fundamental empirical features of traffic breakdown at highway bottlenecks.
Article Text
References (110)
- B. S. Kerner, in Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium on Highway Capacity and Level of Service, edited by (Road Directorate, Ministry of Transport, Denmark, 1998), Vol. 2, pp. 621–642; Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3797 (1998); B. S. Kerner, in Traffic and Granular Flow' 97, edited by and (Springer, Singapore, 1998), pp. 239–267.
- B. S. Kerner, Transp. Res. Rec. 1678, 160 (1999); B. S. Kerner, in Transportation and Traffic Theory, edited by A. Ceder (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 1999), pp. 147–171; Physics World 12, 25–30 (1999).
- C. F. Daganzo, M. J. Cassidy, and R. L. Bertini, Transp. Res. A 33, 365 (1999).
- M. Schönhof and D. Helbing, Transp. Sci. 41, 135 (2007).
- M. Schönhof and D. Helbing, Transp. Res. B 43, 784 (2009).
- M. Treiber, A. Kesting, and D. Helbing, Transp. Res. B 44, 983 (2010).
- D. Helbing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067 (2001).
- M. Treiber and A. Kesting, Traffic Flow Dynamics (Springer, Berlin, 2013).
- B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, L31 (2002).
- B. S. Kerner, S. L. Klenov, and D. E. Wolf, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 35, 9971 (2002).
- B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, Phys. Rev. E 68, 036130 (2003).
- B. S. Kerner, in Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, edited by R. A. Meyers (Springer, Berlin, 2009), pp. 9302–9355; 9355–9411; B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, in Encyclopedia of Complexity and System Science, edited by R. A. Meyers (Springer, Berlin, 2009), pp. 9282–9302.
- B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, Phys. Rev. E 80, 056101 (2009).
- B. S. Kerner, The Physics of Traffic (Springer, Berlin, New York, 2004).
- B. S. Kerner, Introduction to Modern Traffic Flow Theory and Control (Springer, Berlin, New York, 2009).
- B. S. Kerner, Physica A 392, 5261 (2013).
- A. D. May, Traffic Flow Fundamentals (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1990).
- Highway Capacity Manual 2000 (National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2000).
- Highway Capacity Manual 2010 (National Research Council, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2010).
- F. L. Hall and K. Agyemang-Duah, Transp. Res. Rec. 1320, 91 (1991).
- F. L. Hall, V. F. Hurdle, and J. H. Banks, Transp. Res. Rec. 1365, 12 (1992).
- L. Elefteriadou, R. P. Roess, and W. R. McShane, Transp. Res. Rec. 1484, 80 (1995).
- B. N. Persaud, S. Yagar, and R. Brownlee, Transp. Res. Rec. 1634, 64 (1998).
- M. Lorenz and L. Elefteriadou, Transp. Res. Circular E-C018, 84 (2000).
- W. Brilon, M. Regler, and J. Geistefeld, Straßenverkehrstechnik, Heft 3, 136 (2005).
- W. Brilon and H. Zurlinden, Straßenverkehrstechnik, Heft 4, 164 (2004).
- W. Brilon, J. Geistefeldt, and M. Regler, Traffic and Transportation Theory, edited by H. S. Mahmassani (Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2005), pp. 125–144.
- J. Geistefeldt and W. Brilon, in Transportation and Traffic Theory 2009, edited by W. H. K. Lam, S. C. Wong, and H. K. Lo, (Springer, New York, 2009), pp. 583–602.
- L. Elefteriadou, An Introduction to Traffic Flow Theory, Springer Optimization and Its Applications, Vol. 84 (Springer, Berlin, 2014).
- B. S. Kerner, Physica A 397, 76 (2014).
- B. S. Kerner, H. Rehborn, R.-P. Schäfer, S. L. Klenov, J. Palmer, S. Lorkowski, and N. Witte, Physica A 392, 221 (2013).
- C. W. Gardiner, Handbook of Stochastic Methods, 2nd ed. (Springer, Berlin, 1990).
- M. J. Lighthill and G. B. Whitham, Proc. Roy. Soc. A 229, 281 (1955).
- P. I. Richards, Oper. Res. 4, 42 (1956).
- C. F. Daganzo, Transp. Res. B 28, 269 (1994).
- C. F. Daganzo, Transp. Res. B 29, 79 (1995).
- R. Herman, E. W. Montroll, R. B. Potts, and R. W. Rothery, Oper. Res. 7, 86 (1959).
- D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. B. Potts, Oper. Res. 7, 499 (1959).
- D. C. Gazis, R. Herman, and R. W. Rothery, Oper. Res. 9, 545 (1961).
- Traffic Flow Theory, edited by N. H. Gartner, C. J. Messer, and A. Rathi (Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, 2001); D. C. Gazis, Traffic Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2002).
- B. S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser, Phys. Rev. E 48, R2335(R) (1993).
- B. S. Kerner and P. Konhäuser, Phys. Rev. E 50, 54 (1994).
- B. S. Kerner, P. Konhäuser, and M. Schilke, Phys. Rev. E 51, 6243 (1995).
- D. Chowdhury, L. Santen, and A. Schadschneider, Phys. Rep. 329, 199 (2000); T. Nagatani, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 1331 (2002); K. Nagel, P. Wagner, and R. Woesler, Oper. Res. 51, 681 (2003); R. Mahnke, J. Kaupužs, and I. Lubashevsky, Phys. Rep. 408, 1 (2005).
- As mentioned in Sec. I, in three-phase theory the overacceleration effect determines a traffic-flow instability that causes a growing wave of local increase in vehicle speed from an initial synchronized flow speed to a free flow speed (SF transition). However, this instability can occur only if a traffic-flow model can show the synchronized flow traffic phase (S), including metastable states with respect to an SF transition [Fig. 1(c)] [2, 14, 15]. It should be emphasized that two-phase traffic-flow models, in particular, that are described by ordinary differential equations, including GM class models [39, 40, 44], can show overacceleration due to a time delay in vehicle acceleration. However, the two-phase traffic models cannot describe the synchronized flow phase. For this reason, two-phase traffic-flow models cannot describe the SF and FS phase transitions.
- B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 8753 (2004).
- B. S. Kerner, Phys. Rev. E 85, 036110 (2012).
- B. S. Kerner, S. L. Klenov, G. Hermanns, and M. Schreckenberg, Physica A 392, 4083 (2013).
- L. C. Davis, Phys. Rev. E 69, 016108 (2004).
- H. K. Lee, R. Barlović, M. Schreckenberg, and D. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 238702 (2004).
- R. Jiang and Q.-S. Wu, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 37, 8197 (2004).
- K. Gao, R. Jiang, S.-X. Hu, B.-H. Wang, and Q.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. E 76, 026105 (2007).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 368, 541 (2006).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 361, 606 (2006).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 387, 6395 (2008).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 388, 4459 (2009).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 389, 3588 (2010).
- L. C. Davis, Physica A 391, 1679 (2012).
- R. Jiang, M.-B. Hua, R. Wang, and Q.-S. Wu, Phys. Lett. A 365, 6 (2007).
- R. Jiang and Q.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. E 72, 067103 (2005).
- R. Jiang and Q.-S. Wu, Physica A 377, 633 (2007).
- R. Wang, R. Jiang, Q.-S. Wu, and M. Liu, Physica A 378, 475 (2007).
- A. Pottmeier, C. Thiemann, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, in Traffic and Granular Flow'05, edited by A. Schadschneider, T. Pöschel, R. Kühne, M. Schreckenberg, and D. E. Wolf (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 503–508.
- X. G. Li, Z. Y. Gao, K. P. Li, and X. M. Zhao, Phys. Rev. E 76, 016110 (2007).
- J. J. Wu, H. J. Sun, and Z. Y. Gao, Phys. Rev. E 78, 036103 (2008).
- J. A. Laval, in Traffic and Granular Flow'05, edited by A. Schadschneider, T. Pöschel, R. Kühne, M. Schreckenberg, and D. E. Wolf (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 521–526.
- S. Hoogendoorn, H. van Lint, and V. L. Knoop, Transp. Res. Rec. 2088, 102 (2008).
- B. S. Kerner, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 41, 215101 (2008).
- K. Gao, R. Jiang, B.-H. Wang, and Q.-S. Wu, Physica A 388, 3233 (2009).
- B. Jia, X.-G. Li, T. Chen, R. Jiang, and Z.-Y. Gao, Transportmetrica 7, 127 (2011).
- J.-F. Tian, B. Jia, X.-G. Li, R. Jiang, X.-M. Zhao, and Z.-Y. Gao, Physica A 388, 4827 (2009).
- S. He, W. Guan, and L. Song, Physica A 389, 825 (2009).
- C.-J. Jin, W. Wang, R. Jiang, and K. Gao, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P03018.
- S. L. Klenov, in Proceedings of the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (State University), Moscow, 2010), Vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 75–90, in Russian.
- A. V. Gasnikov, S. L. Klenov, E. A. Nurminski, Y. A. Kholodov, and N. B. Shamray, Introduction to Mathematical Simulations of Traffic Flow (MCNMO, Moscow, 2013), in Russian.
- S. Kokubo, J. Tanimoto, and A. Hagishima, Physica A 390, 561 (2011).
- H.-K. Lee and B.-J. Kim, Physica A 390, 4555 (2011).
- C.-J. Jin and W. Wang, Physica A 390, 4184 (2011).
- J. P. L. Neto, M. L. Lyra, and C. R. da Silva, Physica A 390, 3558 (2011).
- P. Zhang, C.-X. Wu, and S. C. Wong, Physica A 391, 456 (2012).
- W.-H. Lee, S.-S. Tseng, J.-L. Shieh, and H.-H. Chen, IEEE Trans. ITS 12, 1047 (2011).
- S. Lee, B. Heydecker, Y. H. Kim, and E.-Y. Shon, J. Adv. Transp. 4, 143 (2011).
- J.-F. Tian, Z.-Z. Yuana, M. Treiber, B. Jia, and W.-Y. Zhanga, Physica A 391, 3129 (2012).
- M. Kimathi, Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Kaiserslautern, 2012; https://kluedo.ub.uni-kl.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/2899.
- R. Borsche, M. Kimathi, and A. Klar, Comp. Math. Appl. 64, 2939 (2012).
- Y. Wang, Y. I. Zhang, J. Hu, and L. Li, Int. J. Mod. Phys. C 23, 1250060 (2012).
- J.-f. Tian, Z.-z. Yuan, B. Jia, H.-q. Fan, and T. Wang, Phys. Lett. A 376, 2781 (2012).
- Y. Qiu, J. Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech. 197, 1 (2013).
- B. S. Kerner, S. L. Klenov, and M. Schreckenberg, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046110 (2011).
- H. Yang, J. Lu, X. Hu, and J. Jiang, Physica A 392, 4009 (2013).
- F. Knorr and M. Schreckenberg, J. Stat. Mech. (2013) P07002.
- Xiang Zheng-Tao, Li Yu-Jin, Chen Yu-Feng, and Xiong Li, Physica A 392, 5399 (2013).
- A. R. Mendez and R. M. Velasco, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 46, 462001 (2013).
- Rui Jiang, Mao-Bin Hu, H. M. Zhang, Zi-You Gao, Bin-Jia, Qing-Song Wu, Bing Wang, and Ming Yang, PLOS One 9, e94351 (2014).
- B. S. Kerner and S. L. Klenov, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 1775 (2006).
- B. S. Kerner, Europhys. Lett. 102, 28010 (2013).
- K. Nagel and M. Schreckenberg, J. Phys. (France) I 2, 2221 (1992).
- R. Barlović, L. Santen, A. Schadschneider, and M. Schreckenberg, Eur. Phys. J. B 5, 793 (1998).
- A. Schadschneider, D. Chowdhury, and K. Nishinari, Stochastic Transport in Complex Systems (Elsevier Science, New York, 2011).
- In accordance with known results [10, 89], we have found that traffic breakdown can also be induced at the bottleneck through the upstream propagation of a localized congested pattern, which has earlier occurred downstream of the bottleneck.
- Simulations show that the closer the value of the flow rate to the minimum capacity , the shorter the mean lifetime of a synchronized flow pattern (SP) resulting from the breakdown. This is because a random return SF transition can easily occur at the bottleneck due to model fluctuations at small enough values [Fig. 3(d)]. Thus the value of minimum capacity is determined by a stochastic process of spontaneous dissolution of a congested pattern that emerges after traffic breakdown at the bottleneck. A consideration of such a stochastic process is out of scope of this article. For simplicity, by an approximate calculation of the minimum capacity [Figs. 3(a) and 3(b)], we consider the value at which an SP exists on average about 10 min after it has been induced at the bottleneck.
- To find the probability of spontaneous traffic breakdown , a study of traffic breakdown at the bottleneck during the time interval is repeated for different realizations (runs) for the same set of flow rates and . Different realizations are related to different initial conditions (at ) chosen for random model fluctuations in the KKSW CA model (1)–(16). At the chosen on-ramp inflow rate, at any flow rate at which spontaneous breakdown occurs, a widening synchronized flow pattern (WSP) emerges at the bottleneck [Figs. 4(a) and 4(b)]. Under condition , during the chosen time interval traffic breakdown occurs with the probability . We have found that the larger the difference , the shorter the time interval at which spontaneous traffic breakdown occurs with the probability and the shorter the mean value of breakdown time delay .
- Under a chosen on-ramp inflow rate of vehicles/h and other model parameters, either a spontaneous or induced FS transition results in the emergence of synchronized flow patterns (SP) at the bottleneck [Figs. 3(c)–3(f) and 4(a), 4(b), and 4(d)]. However, in accordance with well-known results [10, 48], we have found that when increases, then after the FS transition has occurred at the bottleneck, wide-moving jams emerge later spontaneously in synchronized flow (SJ transition); as a result, rather than an SP, a general pattern (GP) occurs at the bottleneck. A study of GPs is out of the scope of this article.
- The jam outflow rate [Figs. 2(a) and 2(c)] as the threshold for the FJ transition in a metastable free flow has first been found by Kerner and Konhäuser in a study of wide-moving jams [42] in a version of Payne's macroscopic model [107, 108] that belongs to the GM model class. A generalization of this result for arbitrary values of the on-ramp inflow rate made by Helbing [7, 8, 109] is given by the equation . This equation determines a boundary for induced pattern formation in the diagram of congested patterns at the bottleneck for two-phase traffic-flow models of the GM model class derived by Helbing [7, 8, 109].
- B. S. Kerner, S. L. Klenov, and A. Hiller, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 39, 2001 (2006); Nonlinear. Dyn. 49, 525 (2007); B. S. Kerner, S. L. Klenov, A. Hiller, and H. Rehborn, Phys. Rev. E 73, 046107 (2006).
- See simulations of this instability in Figs. 18 and 19 of [48]. A more detailed consideration of features of the growing wave of a local speed increase caused by the instability due to the overacceleration effect is out of scope of this article.
- H. J. Payne, in Mathematical Models of Public Systems, edited by (Simulation Council, La Jolla, CA, 1971), Vol. 1, pp. 51–60.
- H. J. Payne, Transp. Res. Rec. 772, 68 (1979).
- D. Helbing, A. Hennecke, and M. Treiber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 4360 (1999).
- T. S. Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 4th ed. (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 2012).