- Access by Xinjiang University
Muscle contraction and the elasticity-mediated crosstalk effect
Phys. Rev. E 87, 052714 – Published 23 May, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.052714
Abstract
Cooperative action of molecular motors is essential for many cellular processes. One possible regulator of motor coordination is the elasticity-mediated crosstalk (EMC) coupling between myosin II motors whose origin is the tensile stress that they collectively generate in actin filaments. Here, we use a statistical mechanical analysis to investigate the influence of the EMC effect on the sarcomere — the basic contractile unit of skeletal muscles. We demonstrate that the EMC effect leads to an increase in the attachment probability of motors located near the end of the sarcomere while simultaneously decreasing the attachment probability of the motors in the central part. Such a polarized attachment probability would impair the motors' ability to cooperate efficiently. Interestingly, this undesired phenomenon becomes significant only when the system size exceeds that of the sarcomere in skeletal muscles, which provides an explanation for the remarkable lack of sarcomere variability in vertebrates. Another phenomenon that we investigate is the recently observed increase in the duty ratio of the motors with the tension in muscle. We reveal that the celebrated Hill's equation for muscle contraction is very closely related to this observation.
Article Text
References (32)
- J. Keener and J. Sneyd, Mathematical Physiology (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998).
- B. Alberts et al., Molecular Biology of the Cell (Garland, New York, 2002).
- R. Cooke, Physiol. Rev. 77, 671 (1997).
- T. J. Burkholder and R. L. Lieber, J. Exp. Biol. 204, 1529 (2001).
- O. Farago and A. Bernheim-Groswasser, Soft Matter 7, 3066 (2011).
- A. V. Hill, Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B 126, 136 (1938).
- R. V. Mastrigt, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 27, 413 (1980).
- A. F. Huxley, Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem. 7, 255 (1957).
- H. E. Huxley, J. Mol. Biol. 7, 281 (1963).
- J. Kendrick-Jones, W. Lehman, and A. G. Szent-Gyorgyi, J. Mol. Biol. 54, 313 (1970).
- R. W. Lymn and E. W. Taylor, Biochemistry 10, 4617 (1971).
- T. A. J. Duke, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 96, 2770 (1999).
- G. Lan and S. X. Sun, Biophys. J. 88, 4107 (2005).
- K. Kitamura, M. Tokunaga, S. Esaki, A. H. Iwane, and T. Yanagida, Biophysics 1, 1 (2005).
- S. Walcott and S. X. Sun, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 11, 4871 (2009).
- A. Mansson, Biophys. J. 98, 1237 (2010).
- L. Marcucci and L. Truskinovsky, Eur. Phys. J. E 32, 411 (2010).
- B. Chen and H. Gao, Biophys. J. 101, 396 (2011).
- C. R. Worthington, Nature (London) 193, 1283 (1962).
- A. Landesberg and S. Sideman, Am. J. Physiol. 278, H1274 (2000).
- G. Piazzesi et al., Cell 131, 784 (2007).
- M. Badoual, F. Jülicher, and J. Prost, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 99, 6696 (2002).
- F. Jülicher and J. Prost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4510 (1997).
- M. J. I. Müller, S. Klumpp, and R. Lipowsky, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (USA) 105, 4609 (2008).
- D. Hexner and Y. Kafri, Phys. Biol. 6, 036016 (2009).
- B. Gilboa, D. Gillo, O. Farago, and A. Bernheim-Groswasser, Soft Matter 5, 2223 (2009).
- P. Y. Placais, M. Balland, T. Gúerin, J. F. Joanny, and P. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 158102 (2009).
- On the microscopic time scales of the power stroke, the velocity of the motor head changes and the motor force fluctuates between positive and negative values. In contrast, Hill's equation applies to a coarse-grained picture where the thick and thin filaments are treated as two objects sliding at relative velocity . Therefore, the motor force expressed in Eq. (5) should be considered as an effective force that each attached motor generates between these two objects.
- Y. C. Fung, Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1993).
- N. Dharan and O. Farago, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021904 (2012).
- M. Linari, M. Caremani, and V. A. Lombardi, Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 19 (2010).
- C. Veigel and C. F. Schmidt, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12, 163 (2011).