Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nature of weak generalized synchronization in chaotically driven maps

Gerhard Keller1, Haider H. Jafri2, and Ram Ramaswamy2,3

  • 1Department of Mathematics, Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstrasse 11, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
  • 2School of Physical Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi 110067, India
  • 3University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad 500 046, India

Phys. Rev. E 87, 042913 – Published 12 April, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042913

Abstract

Weak generalized synchrony in a drive-response system occurs when the response dynamics is a unique but nondifferentiable function of the drive, in a manner that is similar to the formation of strange nonchaotic attractors in quasiperiodically driven dynamical systems. We consider a chaotically driven monotone map and examine the geometry of the limit set formed in the regime of weak generalized synchronization. The fractal dimension of the set of zeros is studied both analytically and numerically. We further examine the stable and unstable sets formed and measure the regularity of the coupling function. The stability index as well as the dimension spectrum of the equilibrium measure can be computed analytically.

Article Text

References (33)

  1. C. Huygens, The Pendulum Clock (Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1986).
  2. H. Fujisaka and T. Yamada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 69, 32 (1983); T. Yamada and H. Fujisaka, ibid. 70, 1240 (1983).
  3. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 821 (1990).
  4. M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1804 (1996).
  5. Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984).
  6. L. M. Pecora and T. L. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2109 (1998).
  7. K. Josic, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3053 (1998).
  8. N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995).
  9. Z. Zheng, X. Wang, and M. C. Cross, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056211 (2002).
  10. K. Pyragas, Phys. Rev. E 54, R4508 (1996).
  11. B. R. Hunt, E. Ott, and J. A. Yorke, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4029 (1997).
  12. C. Grebogi, E. Ott, S. Pelikan, and J. Yorke, Physica D 13, 261 (1984).
  13. A. Prasad, S. S. Negi, and R. Ramaswamy, Int. J. Bifurcat. Chaos 11, 291 (2001); A. Prasad, A. Nandi, and R. Ramaswamy, ibid. 17, 3397 (2007).
  14. T. U. Singh, A. Nandi, and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rev. E 78, 025205 (2008).
  15. G. Keller, Fund. Math. 151, 139 (1996).
  16. Z. I. Bezhaeva and V. I. Oseledets, Funct. Anal. Appl. 30, 223 (1996).
  17. R. Sturman and J. Stark, Nonlinearity 13, 113 (2000).
  18. J. F. Heagy and S. M. Hammel, Physica D 70, 140 (1994).
  19. T. Nishikawa and K. Kaneko, Phys. Rev. E 54, 6114 (1996).
  20. A. Prasad, V. Mehra, and R. Ramaswamy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4127 (1997).
  21. T. Yalçinkaya and Y. C. Lai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5039 (1996).
  22. G. Keller and A. Otani, arXiv:1208.2888 [math.DS] (to be published in Dynamical Systems).
  23. L. Barreira and B. Saussol, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353, 3919 (2001).
  24. L. Olsen, J. Math. Pures Appl. 82, 1591 (2003).
  25. O. Podvigina and P. Ashwin, Nonlinearity 24, 887 (2011).
  26. G. Keller, arXiv:1209.2287 [math.DS].
  27. D. Ruelle, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 185, 237 (1973); P. Walters, Amer. J. Math. 97, 937 (1975).
  28. P. Billingsley, Illinois J. Math. 4, 187 (1960).
  29. D. Simpelaere, Acta Appl. Math. 57, 133 (1999).
  30. R. Bowen, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 154, 377 (1971).
  31. I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products (Academic Press, New York, 1980), see formula (4.224.9).
  32. G. Keller, Stoch. Proc. Appl. 71, 187 (1997).
  33. P. Paoli, A. Politi, and R. Badii, Physica D 36, 263 (1989).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation