Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Nonaffine displacements in crystalline solids in the harmonic limit

Saswati Ganguly1, Surajit Sengupta1,2, Peter Sollich3, and Madan Rao4,5

  • 1Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science, 2A & 2B Raja S. C. Mullick Road, Jadavpur, Kolkata 700032, India
  • 2TIFR Centre for Interdisciplinary Sciences, 21 Brundavan Colony, Narsingi, Hyderabad 500075, India
  • 3King's College London, Department of Mathematics, Strand, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
  • 4Raman Research Institute, C.V. Raman Avenue, Bangalore 560080, India
  • 5National Centre for Biological Sciences (TIFR), Bellary Road, Bangalore 560 065, India

Phys. Rev. E 87, 042801 – Published 2 April, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042801

Abstract

A systematic coarse graining of microscopic atomic displacements generates a local elastic deformation tensor D as well as a positive definite scalar χ measuring nonaffinity, i.e., the extent to which the displacements are not representable as affine deformations of a reference crystal. We perform an exact calculation of the statistics of χ and D and their spatial correlations for solids at low temperatures, within a harmonic approximation and in one and two dimensions. We obtain the joint distribution P(χ,D) and the two-point spatial correlation functions for χ and D. We show that nonaffine and affine deformations are coupled even in a harmonic solid, with a strength that depends on the size of the coarse-graining volume Ω and dimensionality. As a corollary to our work, we identify the field hχ conjugate to χ and show that this field may be tuned to produce a transition to a state where the ensemble average χ and the correlation length of χ diverge. Our work should be useful as a template for understanding nonaffine displacements in realistic systems with or without disorder and as a means for developing computational tools for studying the effects of nonaffine displacements in melting, plastic flow, and the glass transition.

Article Text

References (34)

  1. Soft and Fragile Matter: Nonequilibirum Dynamics, Metastability and Flow, edited by M. Evans and M. Cates, The Scottish Universities Summer School in Physics Vol. 53 (Institute of Physics, London, 2000).
  2. F. C. MacKintosh, J. Käs, and P. A. Janmey, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4425 (1995); R. Everaers, Eur. Phys. J. B 4, 341 (1998); J. U. Sommer and S. Lay, Macromolecules 35, 9832 (2002); D. A. Head, F. C. MacKintosh, and A. J. Levine, Phys. Rev. E 68, 025101 (2003); D. A. Head, A. J. Levine, and F. C. MacKintosh, ibid. 68, 061907 (2003); Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 108102 (2003); C. Svaneborg, G. S. Grest, and R. Everaers, ibid. 93, 257801 (2004).
  3. A. Tözeren and R. Skalak, J. Mater. Sci. 24, 1700 (1989).
  4. D. J. Durian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4780 (1995); 55, 1739 (1997); S. A. Langer and A. J. Liu, J. Phys. Chem. B 101, 8667 (1997); S. Tewari, D. Schiemann, D. J. Durian, C. M. Knobler, S. A. Langer, and A. J. Liu, Phys. Rev. E 60, 4385 (1999).
  5. A. Yethiraj and A. van Blaaderen, Nature (London) 421, 513 (2003); H. H. von Grünberg, P. Keim, K. Zahn, and G. Maret, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 255703 (2004); A. Wille, F. Valmont, K. Zahn, and G. Maret, Euro. Phys. Lett. 57, 219 (2002).
  6. H. M. Jaeger, S. R. Nagel, and R. P. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 1259 (1996).
  7. M. L. Falk and J. S. Langer, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 2, 353 (2010).
  8. M. L. Falk and J. S. Langer, Phys. Rev. E 57, 7192 (1998).
  9. L. D. Landau and E. M. Lifshitz, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd ed. (Pergamon Press, New York, 1986).
  10. P. Chaikin and T. Lubensky, Principles of Condensed Matter Physics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995).
  11. J. E. Marsden and T. J. Hughes, Mathematical Foundations of Elasticity (Printice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1968).
  12. B. A. DiDonna and T. C. Lubensky, Phys. Rev. E 72, 066619 (2005).
  13. S. Sengupta, P. Nielaba, M. Rao, and K. Binder, Phys. Rev. E 61, 1072 (2000); 61, 6294 (2000).
  14. Z.-B. Wu, D. J. Diestler, R. Feng, and X. C. Zeng, J. Chem. Phys. 119, 8013 (2003).
  15. A. Tanguy, J. P. Wittmer, F. Leonforte, and J. L. Barrat, Phys. Rev. B 66, 174205 (2002).
  16. K. Zahn, A. Wille, G. Maret, S. Sengupta, and P. Nielaba, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 155506 (2003).
  17. K. Franzrahe, P. Keim, G. Maret, P. Nielaba, and S. Sengupta, Phys. Rev. E 78, 026106 (2008).
  18. K. Franzrahe, P. Nielaba, and S. Sengupta, Phys. Rev. E 82, 016112 (2010).
  19. K.-Q. Zhang and X. Y. Liu, Langmuir 25, 5432 (2009).
  20. P. Keim, G. Maret, U. Herz, and H. H. von Grünberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 215504 (2004).
  21. V. J. Emery and J. D. Axe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1507 (1978).
  22. He Li and George Lykotrafitis, Biophys. J. 102, 75 (2012).
  23. Our definition of Ω implicitly assumes that fluctuations do not change the number and identity of the particles within the neighborhood since we study a network with a fixed topology of connections.
  24. Katalin Bagi, Int. J. Solids Struct. 43, 3166 (2006).
  25. N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin, Solid State Physics (Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, New York, 1976).
  26. E. J. Garboczi and M. F. Thorpe, Phys. Rev. B 32, 4513 (1985).
  27. Michael Tinkham, Group Theory and Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964).
  28. F. L. G. Picard, A. Ajdari, and L. Bocquet, Eur. Phys. J. E 15, 371 (2004).
  29. A. S. Argon, Acta. Metall. 27, 47 (1979).
  30. P. Schall, D. A. Weitz, and F. Spaepen, Science 318, 1895 (2007).
  31. C. E. Maloney and A. Lemaïtre, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 195501 (2004).
  32. M. Tsamados, A. Tanguy, F. Leonforte, and J. L. Barrat, Eur. Phys. J. E 26, 283 (2008).
  33. This may have some similarities to the phenomenon of pressure induced amorphization, see, for e.g., R. Hemley, A. Jephcoat, H. Mao, L. C. Ming, and M. H. Manghnani, Nature (London) 334, 52 (1988).
  34. Tamoghna Das, Surajit Sengupta, and Madan Rao, Phys. Rev. E 82, 041115 (2010).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation