- Access by Xinjiang University
Spin-glass splitting in the quantum Ghatak-Sherrington model
Phys. Rev. E 87, 042127 – Published 29 April, 2013Erratum Phys. Rev. E 89, 039905 (2014)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042127
Abstract
We propose an expanded spin-glass model, called the quantum Ghatak-Sherrington model, which considers spin-1 quantum spin operators in a crystal field and in a transverse field. The analytic solutions and phase diagrams of this model are obtained by using the one-step replica symmetry-breaking ansatz under the static approximation. Our results represent the splitting within one spin-glass (SG) phase depending on the values of crystal and transverse fields. The two separated SG phases, characterized by a density of filled states, show certain differences in their shapes and phase boundaries. Such SG splitting becomes more distinctive when the degeneracy of the empty states of spins is larger than one of their filled states.
Erratum
Erratum: Spin-glass splitting in the quantum Ghatak-Sherrington model [Phys. Rev. E 87, 042127 (2013)]
Article Text
References (22)
- H. Nishimori, Statistical Physics of Spin Glasses and Information Processing: An Introduction (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2001).
- D. Sherrington and S. Kirkpatrick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1792 (1975).
- G. Tammann, Kristallisieren und Schmelzen (Metzger und Wittig, Leipzig, 1903).
- P. E. Cladis, R. K. Bogardus, W. B. Daniels, and G. N. Taylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 720 (1977).
- S. Rastogi, G. W. H. Hohne, and A. Keller, Macromolecules 32, 8897 (1999).
- C. Chevillard and M. Axelos, Colloid Polym. Sci. 275, 537 (1997); J. Desbrieres, M. A. V. Axelos, and M. Rinaudo, Polymer 39, 6251 (1998).
- N. Avraham, B. Khaykovich, Y. Myasoedev, M. Rapoport, H. Shtrikman, D. E. Feldman, T. Tamegai, P. H. Kes, M. Li, M. Konczykowski, K. van der Beek, and E. Zeldov, Nature (London) 411, 451 (2001).
- O. Portmann, A. Vaterlaus, and D. Pescia, Nature (London) 422, 701 (2003).
- A. Schöll, L. Kilian, Y. Zou, J. Ziroff, S. Hame, F. Reinert, E. Umbach, and R. H. Fink, Science 329, 303 (2010).
- S. K. Ghatak and D. Sherrington, J. Phys. C 10, 3149 (1977).
- F. A. da Costa, C. S. O. Yokoi, and R. A. Salinas, J. Phys. A 27, 3365 (1994).
- N. Schupper and N. M. Shnerb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 037202 (2004); Phys. Rev. E 72, 046107 (2005).
- A. Crisanti and L. Leuzzi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 087201 (2005).
- L. Leuzzi, Philos. Mag. 87, 543 (2006).
- S. G. Magalhaes, C. V. Morais, and F. M. Zimmer, Phys. Rev. B 77, 134422 (2008).
- C. V. Morais, M. J. Lazo, F. M. Zimmer, and S. G. Magalhaes, Phys. Rev. E 85, 031133 (2012).
- B. K. Chakrabarti, A. Dutta, and P. Sen, Quantum Ising Phases and Transitions in Transverse Ising Models (Springer, Berlin, 1996), and references therein.
- D.-H. Kim and J.-J. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 66, 054432 (2002), and references therein.
- A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, J. Phys. C 13, L655 (1980).
- M. Mezard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro, Spin Glass Theory and Beyond (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987), and references therein.
- Two TCPs and a first-order phase transition lying between the two TCPs were also found in the SK model under a bimodal random field. See E. Nogueira Jr., F. D. Nobre, F. A. da Costa, and S. Coutinho, Phys. Rev. E 57, 5079 (1998).
- W. Wu, B. Ellman, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli, and D. H. Reich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 2076 (1991); W. Wu, D. Bitko, T. F. Rosenbaum, and G. Aeppli, ibid. 71, 1919 (1993).