- Access by Xinjiang University
Narrow-escape problem for the unit sphere: Homogenization limit, optimal arrangements of large numbers of traps, and the conjecture
Phys. Rev. E 87, 042118 – Published 22 April, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.042118
Abstract
A narrow-escape problem is considered to calculate the mean first passage time (MFPT) needed for a Brownian particle to leave a unit sphere through one of its small boundary windows (traps). A procedure is established to calculate optimal arrangements of equal small boundary traps that minimize the asymptotic MFPT. Based on observed characteristics of such arrangements, a remarkable property is discovered, that is, the sum of squared pairwise distances between optimally arranged traps on a unit sphere is integer, equal to . It is observed for with high precision. It is conjectured that this is the case for such optimal arrangements for all . A dilute trap limit of homogenization theory when can be used to replace the strongly heterogeneous Dirichlet-Neumann MFPT problem with a spherically symmetric Robin problem for which an exact solution is readily found. Parameters of the Robin homogenization problem are computed that capture the first four terms of the asymptotic MFPT. Close agreement of asymptotic and homogenization MFPT values is demonstrated. The homogenization approach provides a radically faster way to estimate the MFPT since it is given by a simple formula and does not involve expensive global optimization to determine locations of boundary traps.
Article Text
References (27)
- I. Grigoriev, Y. Makhnovskii, A. Berezhkovskii, and V. Zitserman, J. Chem. Phys. 116, 9574 (2002).
- D. Holcman and Z. Schuss, J. Stat. Phys. 117, 975 (2004).
- Z. Schuss, A. Singer, and D. Holcman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104, 16098 (2007).
- R. Straube, M. Ward, and M. Falcke, J. Stat. Phys. 129, 377 (2007).
- O. Benichou and R. Voituriez, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 168105 (2008).
- A. Singer, Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman, J. Stat. Phys. 122, 465 (2006).
- D. Holcman and Z. Schuss, J. Phys. A 41, 155001 (2008).
- S. Pillay, M. J. Ward, A. Peirce, and T. Kolokolnikov, Multiscale Model. Simul. 8, 803 (2010).
- A. Singer, Z. Schuss, and D. Holcman, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051111 (2008).
- A. F. Cheviakov, M. J. Ward, and R. Straube, Multiscale Model. Simul. 8, 836 (2010).
- X. Chen and A. Friedman, SIAM J. Math. Anal. 43, 2542 (2011).
- B. Bergersen, D. Boal, and P. Palffy-Muhoray, J. Phys. A 27, 2579 (1994).
- T. Erber and G. Hockney, J. Phys. A 24, L1369 (1999).
- E. Rakhmanov, E. Saff, and Y. Zhou, Math. Res. Lett. 1, 647 (1994).
- R. H. Hardin, N. Sloane, and W. Smith, http://www.research.att.com/~njas/electrons/index.html (unpublished).
- A. Cheviakov, A. Reimer, and M. Ward, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021131 (2012).
- J. Sokolowski and A. Zochowski, SIAM J. Control Optimiz. 37, 1251 (1997).
- C. B. Muratov and S. Y. Shvartsman, Multiscale Model. Simul. 7, 44 (2008).
- H. Cohn and A. Kumar, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 20, 99 (2007).
- J. Pintér, Global Optimization in Action (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1996).
- R. Horst and P. Pardalos, Handbook of Global Optimization. Nonconvex Optimization and Its Applications (Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1995), Vol. 1.
- V. Jeyakumar and A. Rubinov (eds.), in Continuous Optimization: Current Trends and Modern Applications. Applied Optimization. (Springer, New York, 2005).
- Computer code Global and Non-smooth Optimization Toolbox (ganso) for maple (University of Ballarat, Australia), http://guerin.ballarat.edu.au/ard/itms/CIAO/ganso/authors.php.
- G. Beliakov, Optimization methods & software 19, 137 (2004).
- M. Mammadov, A. Rubinov, and J. Yearwood, in Continuous Optimization: Current Trends and Modern Applications (Springer, New York, 2005), pp. 365–385.
- L. Glasser and A. Every, J. Phys. A 25, 2473 (1999).
- R. Spiteri and S. Richards (unpublished, private communication).