Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Unconditionally stable finite-difference time-domain methods for modeling the Sagnac effect

Roman Novitski, Jacob Scheuer, and Ben Z. Steinberg

  • School of Electrical Engineering, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv 69978, Israel

Phys. Rev. E 87, 023303 – Published 15 February, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.023303

Abstract

We present two unconditionally stable finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) methods for modeling the Sagnac effect in rotating optical microsensors. The methods are based on the implicit Crank-Nicolson scheme, adapted to hold in the rotating system reference frame—the rotating Crank-Nicolson (RCN) methods. The first method (RCN-2) is second order accurate in space whereas the second method (RCN-4) is fourth order accurate. Both methods are second order accurate in time. We show that the RCN-4 scheme is more accurate and has better dispersion isotropy. The numerical results show good correspondence with the expression for the classical Sagnac resonant frequency splitting when using group refractive indices of the resonant modes of a microresonator. Also we show that the numerical results are consistent with the perturbation theory for the rotating degenerate microcavities. We apply our method to simulate the effect of rotation on an entire Coupled Resonator Optical Waveguide (CROW) consisting of a set of coupled microresonators. Preliminary results validate the formation of a rotation-induced gap at the center of a transfer function of a CROW.

Article Text

References (20)

  1. G. Sagnac, C. R. Acad. Sci. 95, 708 (1913).
  2. S. Sunada and T. Harayama, Phys. Rev. A 74, 021801 (2006).
  3. C. Peng, Z. Li, and A. Xu, Opt. Express 15, 3864 (2007).
  4. B. Z. Steinberg, Phys. Rev. E 71, 056621 (2005).
  5. D. Hah and D. Zhang, Opt. Express 18, 18200 (2010).
  6. J. Scheuer and A. Yariv, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 053901 (2006).
  7. B. Z. Steinberg and A. Boag, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 142 (2007).
  8. B. Z. Steinberg, A. Shamir, and A. Boag, Phys. Rev. E 74, 016608 (2006).
  9. C. Peng, R. Hui, X. Luo, Z. Li, and A. Xu, Opt. Express 16, 5227 (2008).
  10. R. Sarma, H. Noh, and H. Cao, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 29, 1648 (2012).
  11. C. Sun and C. W. Trueman, Electron. Lett. 39, 595 (2003).
  12. T. Shiozawa, Proc. IEEE 61, 1694 (1973).
  13. J. L. Anderson and J. W. Ryon, Phys. Rev. 181, 1765 (1969).
  14. J. W. Thomas, Numerical Partial Differential Equations (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1998).
  15. G. W. Stewart, Matrix Algorithms (Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2001).
  16. B. Finkelstein and R. Kastner, J. Comput. Phys. 221, 422 (2007).
  17. J. P. Berenger, J. Comput. Phys. 114, 185 (1994).
  18. E. J. Post, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39, 475 (1967).
  19. M. S. Shahriar, G. S. Pati, R. Tripathi, V. Gopal, M. Messall, and K. Salit, Phys. Rev. A 75, 053807 (2007).
  20. B. Z. Steinberg, J. Scheuer, and A. Boag, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 24, 1216 (2007).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation