- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Noisy transcription factor NF-κB oscillations stabilize and sensitize cytokine signaling in space

Sirin W. Gangstad*, Cilie W. Feldager*, Jeppe Juul, and Ala Trusina

  • Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark

  • *These authors contributed equally to this work.
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 87, 022702 – Published 5 February, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022702

Abstract

NF-κB is a major transcription factor mediating inflammatory response. In response to a pro-inflammatory stimulus, it exhibits a characteristic response—a pulse followed by noisy oscillations in concentrations of considerably smaller amplitude. NF-κB is an important mediator of cellular communication, as it is both activated by and upregulates production of cytokines, signals used by white blood cells to find the source of inflammation. While the oscillatory dynamics of NF-κB has been extensively investigated both experimentally and theoretically, the role of the noise and the lower secondary amplitude has not been addressed. We use a cellular automaton model to address these issues in the context of spatially distributed communicating cells. We find that noisy secondary oscillations stabilize concentric wave patterns, thus improving signal quality. Furthermore, both lower secondary amplitude as well as noise in the oscillation period might be working against chronic inflammation, the state of self-sustained and stimulus-independent excitations. Our findings suggest that the characteristic irregular secondary oscillations of lower amplitude are not accidental. On the contrary, they might have evolved to increase robustness of the inflammatory response and the system's ability to return to a pre-stimulated state.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (24)

  1. A. R. Brasier, Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 6, 111 (2006).
  2. A. Hoffmann and D. Baltimore, Immunol. Rev. 210, 171 (2006).
  3. H. L. Pahl, Oncogene 18, 6853 (1999).
  4. T. K. Lee et al., Sci. Signal 2, ra65 (2009).
  5. C. A. Kasper et al., Immunity 33, 804 (2010).
  6. P. Yde, M. H. Jensen, and A. Trusina, Phys. Rev. E 84, 051913 (2011).
  7. P. Yde, B. Mengel, M. H. Jensen, S. Krishna, and A. Trusina, BMC Syst. Biol. 5, 115 (2011).
  8. J. Geiger, D. Wessels, and D. R. Soll, Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 56, 27 (2003).
  9. V. Witko-Sarsat, P. Rieu, B. Descamps-Latscha, P. Lesavre, and L. Halbwachs-Mecarelli, Lab. Invest. 80, 617 (2000).
  10. S. Tay et al., Nature (London) 466, 267 (2010).
  11. B. Mengel, S. Krishna, M. H. Jensen, and A. Trusina, Physica A 391, 100 (2012).
  12. T. Lipniacki, P. Paszek, A. R. A. R. Brasier, B. Luxon, and M. Kimmel, J. Theor. Biol. 228, 195 (2004).
  13. L. Ashall et al., Science 324, 242 (2009).
  14. M. Marcello and M. R. H. White, Biochem. Soc. Trans. 38, 1247 (2010).
  15. D. A. Turner et al., J. Cell Sci. 123, 2834 (2010).
  16. T. Lipniacki and M. Kimmel, Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 7, 215 (2007).
  17. S. Wolfram, Rev. Mod. Phys. 55, 601 (1983).
  18. G. Bub, A. Shrier, and L. Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 058101 (2002).
  19. G. Bub, A. Shrier, and L. Glass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 028105 (2005).
  20. S. Sawai, P. A. Thomason, and E. C. Cox, Nature (London) 433, 323 (2005).
  21. C. Marr and M.-T. Hutt, Phys. Lett. A 349, 302 (2006).
  22. D. E. Nelson et al., Science 306, 704 (2004).
  23. S. L. Werner, D. Barken, and A. Hoffmann, Science 309, 1857 (2005).
  24. C. Nathan and A. Ding, Cell 140, 871 (2010).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 87, 022702– Published 5 February, 2013
  • Received 3 September 2012

©2013 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation