- Access by Xinjiang University
Shape-dependent finite-size effect of the critical two-dimensional Ising model on a triangular lattice
Phys. Rev. E 87, 022124 – Published 19 February, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022124
Abstract
Using a bond-propagation algorithm, we study the finite-size behavior of the critical two-dimensional Ising model on a finite triangular lattice with free boundaries in five shapes: triangular, rhomboid, trapezoid, hexagonal, and rectangular. The critical free energy, internal energy, and specific heat are calculated. The accuracy of the free energy reaches . Based on accurate data on several finite systems with linear size up to , we extract the bulk, surface, and corner parts of the free energy, internal energy, and specific heat accurately. We confirm the conformal field theory prediction that the corner free energy is universal and find logarithmic corrections in higher-order terms in the critical free energy for the rhomboid, trapezoid, and hexagonal systems, which are absent for the triangular and rectangular systems. The logarithmic edge corrections due to edges parallel or perpendicular to the bond directions in the internal energy are found to be identical, while the logarithmic edge corrections due to corresponding edges in the specific heat are different. The corner internal energy and corner specific heat for angles , , and are obtained, as well as higher-order corrections. Comparing with the corner internal energy and corner specific heat we previously found on a rectangle of the square lattice [Phys. Rev. E 86, 041149 (2012)], we conclude that the corner internal energy and corner specific heat for the rectangular shape are not universal.
Article Text
References (28)
- V. Privman and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 30, 322 (1984).
- V. Privman, Phys. Rev. B 38, 9261 (1988).
- J. L. Cardy and I. Peschel, Nucl. Phys. B 300, 377 (1988).
- H. W. J. Blöte, J. L. Cardy, and M. P. Nightingale, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 742 (1986).
- S. Kawata, H.-B. Sun, T. Tanaka, and K. Takeda, Nature (London) 412, 697 (2001).
- V. F. Puntes, K. M. Krishnan, and A. P. Alivisatos, Science 291, 2115 (2001).
- Y. Yin, R. M. Rioux, C. K. Erdonmez, S. Hughes, G. A. Somorjai, and A. P. Alivisatos, Science 304, 711 (2004).
- A. E. Ferdinand and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. 185, 832 (1969).
- L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
- B. Kaufman, Phys. Rev. 76, 1232 (1949).
- H. Au-Yang and M. E. Fisher, Phys. Rev. B 11, 3469 (1975).
- E. V. Ivashkevich, N. Sh. Izmailian, and C.-K. Hu, J. Phys. A 35, 5543 (2002).
- N. Sh. Izmailian and C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. E 76, 041118 (2007).
- N. Sh. Izmailian, K. B. Oganesyan, and C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. E 65, 056132 (2002).
- W. Janke and R. Kenna, Phys. Rev. B 65, 064110 (2002).
- N. Sh. Izmailian and C.-K. Hu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5160 (2001).
- G. F. Newell, Phys. Rev. 79, 876 (1950); R. M. F. Houttapel, Physica 16, 425 (1950).
- J. Salas, J. Phys. A 35, 1833 (2002).
- D. P. Landau, Phys. Rev. B 13, 2997 (1976).
- B. Stošić, S. Milošević, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. B 41, 11466 (1990).
- P. Kleban and I. Vassileva, J. Phys. A 24, 3407 (1991).
- R. Bondesan, J. Dubail, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Nucl. Phys. B 862, 555 (2012).
- R. Bondesan, J. L. Jacobsen, and H. Saleur, Nucl. Phys. B 867, 913 (2013).
- E. Vernier and J. L. Jacobsen, J. Phys. A 45, 045003 (2012).
- Y. L. Loh and E. W. Carlson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 227205 (2006).
- Y. L. Loh, E. W. Carlson, and M. Y. J. Tan, Phys. Rev. B 76, 014404 (2007); in this paper a review of similar earlier algorithms is also presented.
- X.-T. Wu, N. Sh. Izmailian, and W.-A. Guo, Phys. Rev. E 86, 041149 (2012).
- A detailed description of the algorithm can be found in, e.g., W. H. Press et al., Numerical Recipes in Fortran 90 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997).