- Physical Review Journals
All JournalsPhysics Magazine
Access Provided by Xinjiang University

Physical Review E

Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Effect of dimensionality on the percolation threshold of overlapping nonspherical hyperparticles

S. Torquato*

Y. Jiao†

  • Department of Chemistry, Department of Physics, Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, and Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • Princeton Institute for the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • *torquato@princeton.edu
  • †yjiao@princeton.edu
PDF

Phys. Rev. E 87, 022111 – Published 13 February, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.87.022111

Abstract

We study the effect of dimensionality on the percolation threshold ηc of identical overlapping nonspherical convex hyperparticles in d-dimensional Euclidean space Rd. This is done by formulating a scaling relation for ηc that is based on a rigorous lower bound [Torquato, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 054106 (2012)] and a conjecture that hyperspheres provide the highest threshold, for any d, among all convex hyperparticle shapes (that are not a trivial affine transformation of a hypersphere). This scaling relation also exploits the recently discovered principle that low-dimensional continuum percolation behavior encodes high-dimensional information. We derive an explicit formula for the exclusion volume vex of a hyperparticle of arbitrary shape in terms of its d-dimensional volume v, surface area s, and radius of mean curvature R¯ (or, equivalently, mean width). These basic geometrical properties are computed for a wide variety of nonspherical hyperparticle shapes with random orientations across all dimensions, including, among other shapes, various polygons for d=2, Platonic solids, spherocylinders, parallepipeds, and zero-volume plates for d=3 and their appropriate generalizations for d≥4. Using this information, we compute the lower bound and scaling relation for ηc for this comprehensive set of continuum percolation models across dimensions. We demonstrate that the scaling relation provides accurate upper-bound estimates of the threshold ηc across dimensions and becomes increasingly accurate as the space dimension increases.

View figure in article

Article Text

References (41)

  1. R. Zallen, The Physics of Amorphous Solids (Wiley, New York, 1983).
  2. C. J. Brinker and G. W. Scherer, Sol-Gel Science: The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing (Academic, New York, 1990).
  3. D. Stauffer and A. Aharony, Introduction to Percolation Theory (Taylor & Francis, London, 1992).
  4. M. Sahimi, Applications of Percolation Theory (Taylor and Francis, London, 1994).
  5. S. Torquato, Random Heterogeneous Materials: Microstructure and Macroscopic Properties (Springer-Verlag, New York, 2002).
  6. V. Myroshnychenko and C. Brosseau, J. Appl. Phys. 103, 084112 (2008); S. El Bouazzaoui, A. Droussi, M. E. Achour, and C. Brosseau, ibid. 106, 104107 (2009).
  7. S. Torquato, J. Chem. Phys. 136, 054106 (2012).
  8. S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, J. Chem. Phys. 137, 074106 (2012).
  9. Note that the volume of a hyperparticle was denoted by v1 in Ref. [7]. In the present paper, we drop the subscript 1 and simply denote this quantity by v.
  10. For equilibrium hard-particle systems, the total correlation function h(r;η) generally takes on both negative and positive values depending on the values of the radial distance r and reduced density η. One can think of the duality relation (1) as the mapping that is required to convert a correlation function for a hard-particle system to a non-negative pair connectedness function (bounded from above by unity) for the corresponding overlapping particle system.
  11. A hyperparticle is centrally symmetric if its centroid is a point of inversion symmetry.
  12. Roughly speaking, the exclusion volume associated with a particle is the volume excluded to the centroid of another particle under the condition that the particles are impenetrable to one another. Thus, when a particle centroid is inside another particle's exclusion volume, the particles necessarily overlap one another. The reader is referred to Ref. [7] for additional details.
  13. Balberg et al. [14] have suggested that the mean number of overlaps per particle at the threshold Nc is an approximant invariant for overlapping convex particles of general shape in two and three dimensions. Simulations have shown this not to be an invariant in these low dimensions. However, the asymptotic result (11) reveals that Nc is an invariant, with value unity, in the high-dimensional limit, regardless of the shape of the convex particle.
  14. I. Balberg, C. H. Anderson, S. Alexander, and N. Wagner, Phys. Rev. B 30, 3933 (1984).
  15. S. Torquato, J. Stat. Phys. 45, 843 (1986).
  16. C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, Phys. Rev. E 84, 056102 (2011).
  17. D. Stoyan, W. S. Kendall, and J. Mecke, Stochastic Geometry and Its Applications, 2nd ed. (Wiley, New York, 1995).
  18. T. Boublík, Mol. Phys. 29, 421 (1975).
  19. T. Kihara, Rev. Mod. Phys. 25, 831 (1953).
  20. R. Schneider, Convex Bodies: The Brunn-Minkowski Theory (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
  21. L. Onsager, Phys. Rev. 65, 117 (1944).
  22. H. S. M. Coxeter, Regular Polytopes (Dover, New York, 1973).
  23. H. Hadwiger, Math. Annalen 239, 271 (1979).
  24. U. Betke and M. Henk, Monatsh. Math. 115, 27 (1993).
  25. M. Henk, J. Richter-Gebert, and G. M. Ziegler, Handbook of Discrete and Computational Geometry (CRC Press, New York, 1997).
  26. D. R. Baker, G. Paul, S. Sreenivasan, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 66, 046136 (2002).
  27. S. Mertens and C. Moore, Phys. Rev. E 86, 061109 (2012).
  28. W. Xia and M. F. Thorpe, Phys. Rev. A 38, 2650 (1988).
  29. Y. B. Yi and A. M. Sastry, Proc. R. Soc. London A 460, 2353 (2004).
  30. E. J. Garboczi, K. A. Snyder, J. F. Douglas, and M. F. Thorpe, Phys. Rev. E 52, 819 (1995).
  31. J. A. Quintanilla, S. Torquato, and R. M. Ziff, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33, L399 (2000).
  32. J. Quintanilla and R. M. Ziff, Phys. Rev. E 76, 051115 (2007).
  33. C. D. Lorenz and R. M. Ziff, J. Chem. Phys. 114, 3659 (2000).
  34. Y. B. Yi and E. Tawerghi, Phys. Rev. E 79, 041134 (2009).
  35. S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, Phys. Rev. E 86, 011102 (2012).
  36. Y. Jiao, F. H. Stillinger, and S. Torquato, Phys. Rev. E 79, 041309 (2009).
  37. Y. Jiao and S. Torquato, J. Chem. Phys. 135, 151101 (2011).
  38. S. Torquato and F. H. Stillinger, Experimental Math. 15, 307 (2006).
  39. C. E. Zachary and S. Torquato, J. Stat. Mech.: Theory Exp. (2011) P10017.
  40. S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, Nature (London) 460, 876 (2009).
  41. S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, Phys. Rev. E 80, 041104 (2009).

Outline

Information

Phys. Rev. E 87, 022111– Published 13 February, 2013
  • Received 2 October 2012
Article part of CHORUS

©2013 American Physical Society

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation