Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Kinetic theory for systems of self-propelled particles with metric-free interactions

Yen-Liang Chou1, Rylan Wolfe1,2, and Thomas Ihle1,3

  • 1Department of Physics, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58108-6050, USA
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, North Dakota State University, Fargo, North Dakota 58105-5516, USA
  • 3Max Planck Institute for the Physics of Complex Systems, Nöthnitzer Straße 38, 01187 Dresden, Germany

Phys. Rev. E 86, 021120 – Published 17 August, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.021120

Abstract

A model of self-driven particles similar to the Vicsek model [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995)] but with metric-free interactions is studied by means of a novel Enskog-type kinetic theory. In this model, N particles of constant speed v0 try to align their travel directions with the average direction of a fixed number of closest neighbors. At strong alignment a global flocking state forms. The alignment is defined by a stochastic rule, not by a Hamiltonian. The corresponding interactions are of genuine multibody nature. The theory is based on a Master equation in 3N-dimensional phase space, which is made tractable by means of the molecular chaos approximation. The phase diagram for the transition to collective motion is calculated and compared to direct numerical simulations. A linear stability analysis of a homogeneous ordered state is performed using the kinetic but not the hydrodynamic equations in order to achieve high accuracy. In contrast to the regular metric Vicsek-model no instabilities occur. This confirms previous direct simulations that, for Vicsek-like models with metric-free interactions, there is no formation of density bands and that the flocking transition is continuous.

Article Text

References (36)

  1. T. Vicsek and A. Zafeiris, Phys. Rep. 517, 71 (2012).
  2. S. Ramaswamy, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys. 1, 323 (2010).
  3. T. Vicsek, A. Czirok, E.Ben-Jacob, I. Cohen, and O. Shochet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1226 (1995); M. Nagy, I. Daruka, and T. Vicsek, Physica A 373, 445 (2007).
  4. J. Toner and Y. Tu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4326 (1995); Phys. Rev. E 58, 4828 (1998).
  5. G. Grégoire and H. Chaté, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 025702 (2004); H. Chaté, F. Ginelli, G. Gregoire, and F. Raynaud, Phys. Rev. E 77, 046113 (2008).
  6. T. Ihle, Phys. Rev. E 83, 030901 (2011).
  7. E. Bertin, M. Droz, and G. Grégoire, Phys. Rev. E 74, 022101 (2006); J. Phys. A 42, 445001 (2009).
  8. S. Mishra, A. Baskaran, and M. C. Marchetti, Phys. Rev. E 81, 061916 (2010).
  9. M. Ballerini et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 1232 (2008); , Anim. Behav. 76, 201 (2008).
  10. M. Aldana and C. Huepe, J. Stat. Phys. 112, 135 (2003).
  11. C. Huepe and M. Aldana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 168701 (2004).
  12. M. Aldana, V. Dossetti, C. Huepe, V. M. Kenkre, and H. Larralde, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 095702 (2007).
  13. F. Peruani, A. Deutsch, and M. Bär, Phys. Rev. E 74, 030904 (2006).
  14. F. Peruani, L. Schimansky-Geier, and M. Bär, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 191, 173 (2010).
  15. F. Peruani, A. Deutsch, and M. Bär, Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 157, 111 (2008).
  16. A. M. Menzel, Phys. Rev. E 85, 021912 (2012).
  17. P. Romanczuk and L. Schimansky-Geier, Ecol. Complex. 10, 83 (2012).
  18. J. Gao, S. Havlin, X. Xu, and H. E. Stanley, Phys. Rev. E 84, 046115 (2011).
  19. F. Ginelli and H. Chaté, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 168103 (2010).
  20. T. Niizato and Y. P. Gunji, Ecol. Model. 222, 3041 (2011).
  21. A. Peshkov, S. Ngo, E. Bertin, H. Chaté, and F. Ginelli, arXiv:1203.6853v1 [Phys. Rev. Lett. (to be published)].
  22. R. W. Tegeder and J. Krause, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London B 350, 381 (1995).
  23. A. Cavagna et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 11865 (2010).
  24. A. Malevanets and R. Kapral, J. Chem. Phys. 110, 8605 (1999).
  25. T. Ihle, PhysChemChemPhys 11, 9667 (2009).
  26. T. Ihle, E. Tüzel, and D. M. Kroll, Phys. Rev. E 72, 046707 (2005).
  27. Y. L. Chou, A. Gebremariam, and T. Ihle (in preparation).
  28. L. Peliti, J. Phys. France 46, 1469 (1985).
  29. J. Tailleur and M. E. Cates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 218103 (2008).
  30. A. G. Thompson, J. Tailleur, M. E. Cates, and R. A. Blythe, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P02029.
  31. O. Pierre-Louis and C. Misbah, Phys. Rev. B 58, 2259 (1998).
  32. J. K. Parrish and L. Edelstein-Keshet, Science 284, 99 (1999); I. D. Couzin et al., Nature 433, 513 (2005).
  33. D. Helbing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 1067 (2001).
  34. A. Jadbabaie, J. Lin, and S. Morse, IEEE Trans. Auto. Control 48, 988 (2003).
  35. A. E. Turgut et al., Swarm Intell. 2, 97 (2008).
  36. W. M. Shen et al., Auton. Robots 17, 93 (2004).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation