Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Geodesic defect anchoring on nematic shells

Leonid V. Mirantsev

André M. Sonnet

Epifanio G. Virga

  • Institute of the Problems of Mechanical Engineering, Academy of Sciences of Russia, St. Petersburg 199178, Russia

  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Strathclyde, Livingstone Tower, 26 Richmond Street, Glasgow G1 1XH, Scotland

  • Dipartimento di Matematica Università di Pavia, Via Ferrata 1, 27100 Pavia, Italy

Phys. Rev. E 86, 020703(R) – Published 23 August, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.86.020703

Abstract

Nematic shells are colloidal particles coated with nematic liquid crystal molecules, which may freely glide and rotate on the colloid's surface while keeping their long axis on the local tangent plane. Molecular dynamics simulations on a nanoscopic spherical shell indicate that under appropriate adhesion conditions for the molecules on the equator, the equilibrium nematic texture exhibits at each pole a pair of +12 defects so close to one another to be treated as one +1 defect. Spirals connect the polar defects, though the continuum limit of the interaction potential would not feature any elastic anisotropy. A molecular averaging justifies an anchoring defect energy that feels the geodesics emanating from the defect. All our observations are explained by such a geodesic anchoring, which vanishes on flat manifolds.

Article Text

References (20)

  1. T. Lopez-Leon and A. Fernández-Nieves, Colloid Polym. Sci. 289, 345 (2011).
  2. H. Poincaré, J. Math. Pures Appl. 2, 151 (1886).
  3. D. R. Nelson, Nano Lett. 2, 1125 (2002).
  4. G. A. DeVries, M. Brunnbauer, Y. Hu, A. M. Jackson, B. Long, B. T. Neltner, O. Uzun, B. H. Wunsch, and F. Stellacci, Science 315, 358 (2007).
  5. S. C. Glotzer and M. J. Solomon, Nat. Mater. 6, 557 (2007).
  6. E. C. Nelson and P. V. Braun, Science 318, 924 (2007).
  7. Zhang, A. S. Keys, T. Chen, and S. C. Glotzer, Langmuir 21, 11547 (2005).
  8. M. A. Bates, J. Chem. Phys. 128, 104707 (2008).
  9. H. Shin, M. J. Bowick, and X. Xing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 037802 (2008).
  10. T. Lopez-Leon, A. Fernández-Nieves, M. Nobili, and C. Blanc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 247802 (2011).
  11. T. Lopez-Leon, V. Koning, K. B. S. Devaiah, V. Vitelli, and A. Fernández-Nieves, Nat. Phys. 7, 391 (2011).
  12. G. Skačej and C. Zannoni, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 197802 (2008).
  13. S. Kralj, R. Rosso, and E. G. Virga, Soft Matter 7, 670 (2011).
  14. M. A. Bates, G. Skačej, and C. Zannoni, Soft Matter 6, 655 (2010).
  15. G. R. Luckhurst and S. Romano, Proc. R. Soc. London A 373, 111 (1980).
  16. M. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulations of Liquids (Claredon Press, Oxford, 1987).
  17. M. Pereira, A. Canabarro, I. de Oliveira, M. Lyra, and L. Mirantsev, Eur. Phys. J. E 31, 81 (2010).
  18. J. J. Stoker, Differential Geometry, Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XX (Wiley, New York, 1969).
  19. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993).
  20. R. L. B. Selinger, A. Konya, A. Travesset, and J. V. Selinger, J. Phys. Chem. B 115, 13989 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation