Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Statistical modeling approach for detecting generalized synchronization

Johannes Schumacher*, Robert Haslinger, and Gordon Pipa

  • Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Germany and Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA and Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA and Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Germany

  • *joschuma@uos.de
  • robhh@nmr.mgh.harvard.edu
  • gpipa@uos.de

Phys. Rev. E 85, 056215 – Published 29 May, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.056215

Abstract

Detecting nonlinear correlations between time series presents a hard problem for data analysis. We present a generative statistical modeling method for detecting nonlinear generalized synchronization. Truncated Volterra series are used to approximate functional interactions. The Volterra kernels are modeled as linear combinations of basis splines, whose coefficients are estimated via l1 and l2 regularized maximum likelihood regression. The regularization manages the high number of kernel coefficients and allows feature selection strategies yielding sparse models. The method's performance is evaluated on different coupled chaotic systems in various synchronization regimes and analytical results for detecting m:n phase synchrony are presented. Experimental applicability is demonstrated by detecting nonlinear interactions between neuronal local field potentials recorded in different parts of macaque visual cortex.

Article Text

References (21)

  1. N. F. Rulkov, M. M. Sushchik, L. S. Tsimring, and H. D. I. Abarbanel, Phys. Rev. E 51, 980 (1995).
  2. M. G. Rosenblum, A. S. Pikovsky, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4193 (1997).
  3. L. Kocarev and U. Parlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1816 (1996).
  4. D. V. Senthilkumar, M. Lakshmanan, and J. Kurths, Chaos 18, 023118 (2008).
  5. F. Takens, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 898, 366 (1981).
  6. N. Marwan, M. C. Romano, M. Thiel, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 438, 237 (2007).
  7. C. Stam, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 163, 236 (2002).
  8. T. Kreuz, F. Mormann, R. Andrzejak, A. Kraskov, K. Lehnertz, and P. Grassberger, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena 225, 29 (2007).
  9. V. Sakkalis, C. D. Giurcaneanu, P. Xanthopoulos, M. E. Zervakis, V. Tsiaras, Y. Yang, E. Karakonstantaki, and S. Micheloyannis, Trans. Info. Tech. Biomed. 13, 433 (2009).
  10. M. Romano, M. Thiel, J. Kurths, I. Kiss, and J. Hudson, Europhys. Lett. 71, 466 (2005).
  11. W. J. Rugh, in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 102 (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore 1981).
  12. S. Boyd, L. Chua, and C. Desoer, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information 1, 243 (1984).
  13. C. D. Boor, A Practical Guide to Splines (Springer, New York, 2001).
  14. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani, J Stat. Softw. 33, 1 (2010).
  15. H. D. I. Abarbanel, N. F. Rulkov, and M. M. Sushchik, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4528 (1996).
  16. G. Osipov, B. Hu, C. Zhou, M. Ivanchenko, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 024101 (2003).
  17. J. Y. Chen, K. W. Wong, H. Y. Zheng, and J. W. Shuai, Phys. Rev. E 63, 036214 (2001).
  18. F. Gerhard, G. Pipa, B. Lima, S. Neuenschwander, and W. Gerstner, Frontiers Computational Neuroscience 5 (2011)
  19. P. Uhlhaas, G. Pipa, B. Lima, L. Melloni, S. Neuenschwander, D. Nikolić, and W. Singer, Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience 3 (2009).
  20. F. Pasemann and T. Wennekers, Network: Computation in Neural Systems 11, 41 (2000).
  21. K. J. Friston, The Neuroscientist 7, 406 (2001).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation