Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Efficient coarse simulation of a growing avascular tumor

Michail E. Kavousanakis1,*, Ping Liu2, Andreas G. Boudouvis1, John Lowengrub3, and Ioannis G. Kevrekidis2,4

  • 1School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, 9 Heroon Polytechniou St., Zographos, Athens, GR-15780, Greece
  • 2Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA
  • 3Department of Mathematics, University of California, 103 MSTB, Irvine, California 92697, USA
  • 4Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA

  • *mihkavus@chemeng.ntua.gr

Phys. Rev. E 85, 031912 – Published 22 March, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031912

Abstract

The subject of this work is the development and implementation of algorithms which accelerate the simulation of early stage tumor growth models. Among the different computational approaches used for the simulation of tumor progression, discrete stochastic models (e.g., cellular automata) have been widely used to describe processes occurring at the cell and subcell scales (e.g., cell-cell interactions and signaling processes). To describe macroscopic characteristics (e.g., morphology) of growing tumors, large numbers of interacting cells must be simulated. However, the high computational demands of stochastic models make the simulation of large-scale systems impractical. Alternatively, continuum models, which can describe behavior at the tumor scale, often rely on phenomenological assumptions in place of rigorous upscaling of microscopic models. This limits their predictive power. In this work, we circumvent the derivation of closed macroscopic equations for the growing cancer cell populations; instead, we construct, based on the so-called “equation-free” framework, a computational superstructure, which wraps around the individual-based cell-level simulator and accelerates the computations required for the study of the long-time behavior of systems involving many interacting cells. The microscopic model, e.g., a cellular automaton, which simulates the evolution of cancer cell populations, is executed for relatively short time intervals, at the end of which coarse-scale information is obtained. These coarse variables evolve on slower time scales than each individual cell in the population, enabling the application of forward projection schemes, which extrapolate their values at later times. This technique is referred to as coarse projective integration. Increasing the ratio of projection times to microscopic simulator execution times enhances the computational savings. Crucial accuracy issues arising for growing tumors with radial symmetry are addressed by applying the coarse projective integration scheme in a cotraveling (cogrowing) frame. As a proof of principle, we demonstrate that the application of this scheme yields highly accurate solutions, while preserving the computational savings of coarse projective integration.

Article Text

References (57)

  1. R. A. Weinberg, Sci. Am. 275, 62 (1996).
  2. J. S. Lowengrub, H. B. Frieboes, F. Jin, Y.-L. Chuang, X. Li, P. Macklin, S. M. Wise, and V. Cristini, Nonlinearity 23, R1 (2010).
  3. H. M. Byrne, Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 221 (2010).
  4. A. R. A. Anderson and V. Quaranta, Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 227 (2008).
  5. J. A. Adam, Math. Biosci. 81, 229 (1986).
  6. P. Tracqui, G. C. Cruywagen, D. E. Woodward, G. T. Bartoo, J. D. Murray, and E. C. J. Alvord, Cell Proliferation 28, 17 (1995).
  7. D. E. Woodward, J. Cook, P. Tracqui, G. C. Cruywagen, J. D. Murrayand, and E. C. J. Alvord, Cell Proliferation 29, 269 (1996).
  8. J. P. Ward and J. R. King, Math. Med. Biol. 14, 39 (2003).
  9. H. M. Byrne and M. A. J. Chaplain, Math. Biosci. 130, 151 (1995).
  10. H. M. Byrne and M. A. J. Chaplain, Eur. J. Appl. Math. 8, 639 (1997).
  11. M. R. Owen and J. A. Sherratt, J. Theor. Biol. 189, 63 (1997).
  12. G. J. Pettet, C. P. Please, M. J. Tindall, and D. L. S. McElwain, Bull. Math. Biol. 63, 231 (2001).
  13. V. Cristini, J. Lowengrub, and Q. Nie, J. Math. Biol. 46, 191 (2003).
  14. S. M. Wise, J. S. Lowengrub, H. B. Frieboes, and V. Cristini, J. Theor. Biol. 253, 524 (2008).
  15. V. Cristini, X. Li, J. S. Lowengrub, and S. M. Wise, J. Math. Biol. 58, 723 (2009).
  16. H. B. Frieboes, F. Jina, Y.-L. Chuang, S. M. Wise, J. S. Lowengrub, and V. Cristini, J. Theor. Biol. 264, 1254 (2010).
  17. K. Pham, H. B. Frieboes, V. Cristini, and J. Lowengrub, J. R. Soc., Interface 8, 16 (2011).
  18. T. Alarcon, H. M. Byrne, and P. K. Maini, J. Theor. Biol. 225, 257 (2003).
  19. S. Dormann and A. Deutsch, In Silico Biol. 2, 0035 (2002).
  20. G. B. Ermentrout and L. Edelstein-Keshet, J. Theor. Biol. 160, 97 (1993).
  21. S. C. Ferreira Jr., M. L. Martins, and M. J. Vilela, Phys. Rev. E 65, 021907 (2002).
  22. A. R. Kansal, S. Torquato, G. R. Harsh IV, E. A. Chiocca, and T. S. Deisboeck, J. Theor. Biol. 203, 367 (2000).
  23. A. A. Patel, E. T. Gawlinski, S. K. Lemiueux, and R. A. Gatenby, J. Theor. Biol. 213, 315 (2001).
  24. D. Drasdo and S. Höhme, Phys. Biol. 2, 133 (2005).
  25. G. Cheng, B. B. Youssef, P. Markenscoff, and K. Zygourakis, Biophys. J. 90, 713 (2006).
  26. D. S. Lee, H. Rieger, and K. Bartha, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 058104 (2006).
  27. A. R. Anderson, K. A. Rejniak, P. Gerlee, and V. Quaranta, J. Math. Biol. 58, 579 (2009).
  28. A. Sottoriva, L. Vermeulen, and S. Tavaré, PLoS Comput. Biol. 7, e1001132 (2011).
  29. Y. Kim, M. A. Stolarska, and H. G. Othmer, Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci. 17, 1773 (2007).
  30. Z. Wang, L. Zhang, J. Sagotsky, and T. S. Deisboeck, Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 4, 50 (2007).
  31. P. Macklin, M. E. Edgerton, A. M. Thompson, and V. Cristini, J. Theor. Biol. 301, 122 (2012).
  32. K. Theodoropoulos, Y.-H. Qian, and I. G. Kevrekidis, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 97, 9840 (2000).
  33. I. G. Kevrekidis, C. W. Gear, J. M. Hyman, P. G. Kevrekidis, O. Runborg, and C. Theodoropoulos, Commun. Math. Sci. 1, 707 (2003).
  34. I. G. Kevrekidis, C. W. Gear, and G. Hummer, AIChE J. 50, 1346 (2004).
  35. C. W. Gear, NEC Research Institute Technical Report No. 2001-130, 2001 (unpublished).
  36. R. Rico-Martínez, C. W. Gear, and I. G. Kevrekidis, J. Comput. Phys. 196, 474 (2004).
  37. M. E. Kavousanakis, R. Erban, A. G. Boudouvis, C. W. Gear, and I. G. Kevrekidis, J. Comput. Phys. 225, 382 (2007).
  38. D. G. Mallet and L. G. De Pillis, J. Theor. Biol. 239, 334 (2006).
  39. J. Folkman and M. Hochberg, J. Exp. Med. 138, 745 (1973).
  40. R. M. Sutherland, Science 240, 177 (1988).
  41. H. P. Greenspan, Stud. Appl. Math. 51, 317 (1972).
  42. P. Carmeliet and R. K. Jain, Nature (London) 407, 249 (2000).
  43. P. Gerlee and A. R. A. Anderson, Phys. Rev. E 75, 051911 (2007).
  44. A. H. Lin, Discret. Contin. Dyn. S., Ser. B 4, 241 (2004).
  45. H. M. Byrne, Using Mathematics to Study Solid Tumour Growth, Proceedings of the Ninth General Meeting of European Women in Mathematics (Hindawi Publishing Corporation, New York, 2001), pp. 81–107.
  46. H. Riedel, The Cancer Handbook, edited by M. R. Alison (Wiley, New York, 2004).
  47. T. Burden, J. Ernstberger, and K. R. Fister, Discret. Contin. Dyn. S., Ser B 4, 135 (2004).
  48. S. C. Ferreira, M. L. Martins, and M. J. Vilela, Phys. Rev. E 67, 051914 (2003).
  49. D. Hanahan and R. Weinberg, Cell 100, 57 (2000).
  50. A. M. Stein, T. Demuth, D. Mobley, M. Berens, and L. M. Sander, Biophys. J. 92, 356 (2007).
  51. E. Khain, C. M. Schneider-Mizell, M. O. Nowicki, E. A. Chiocca, S. E. Lawler, and L. M. Sander, Europhys. Lett. 88, 28006 (2009).
  52. E. Khain, M. Katakowski, S. Hopkins, A. Szalad, X. Zheng, F. Jiang, and M. Chopp, Phys. Rev. E 83, 031920 (2011).
  53. J. Moeller, O. Runborg, P. Kevrekidis, K. Lust, and I. Kevrekidis, J. Bifurcation Chaos 15, 975 (2005).
  54. C. W. Rowley, I. G. Kevrekidis, J. E. Marsden, and K. Lust, Nonlinearity 16, 1257 (2003).
  55. S. Li, J. S. Lowengrub, and P. H. Leo, J. Comput. Phys. 225, 554 (2007).
  56. W. J. Beyn, S. Selle, and V. Thuemmler, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. 7, 577 (2008).
  57. G. Samaey, D. Roose, and I. G. Kevrekidis, Multiscale Model. Simul. 4, 278 (2005).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation