Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Stochastically driven single-level quantum dot: A nanoscale finite-time thermodynamic machine and its various operational modes

Massimiliano Esposito1, Niraj Kumar2, Katja Lindenberg2, and Christian Van den Broeck3

  • 1Complex Systems and Statistical Mechanics, University of Luxembourg, L-1511 Luxembourg, Luxembourg
  • 2Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry and BioCircuits Institute, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, California 92093-0340, USA
  • 3Hasselt University, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium

Phys. Rev. E 85, 031117 – Published 15 March, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.031117

Abstract

We describe a single-level quantum dot in contact with two leads as a nanoscale finite-time thermodynamic machine. The dot is driven by an external stochastic force that switches its energy between two values. In the isothermal regime, it can operate as a rechargeable battery by generating an electric current against the applied bias in response to the stochastic driving and then redelivering work in the reverse cycle. This behavior is reminiscent of the Parrondo paradox. If there is a thermal gradient the device can function as a work-generating thermal engine or as a refrigerator that extracts heat from the cold reservoir via the work input of the stochastic driving. The efficiency of the machine at maximum power output is investigated for each mode of operation, and universal features are identified.

Article Text

References (10)

  1. T. E. Humphrey, R. Newbury, R. P. Taylor, and H. Linke, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 116801 (2002); T. E. Humphrey and H. Linke, ibid. 94, 096601 (2005); C. Van den Broeck, R. Kawai, and P. Meurs, ibid. 93, 090601 (2004); C. Van den Broeck and R. Kawai, ibid. 96, 210601 (2006); C. Van den Broeck, Adv. Chem. Phys. 135, 189 (2007); T. Schmiedl and U. Seifert, Europhys. Lett. 81, 20003 (2008); Y. Izumida and K. Okuda, ibid. 83, 60003 (2008); Phys. Rev. E 80, 021121 (2009); H. Then and A. Engel, ibid. 77, 041105 (2008); M. van den Broek and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 130601 (2008); B. Rutten, M. Esposito, and B. Cleuren, Phys. Rev. B 80, 235122 (2009).
  2. M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Europhys. Lett. 85, 60010 (2009).
  3. M. Esposito, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 130602 (2009).
  4. M. Esposito, R. Kawai, K. Lindenberg, and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 150603 (2010).
  5. A. Parmeggiani, F. Julicher, A. Ajdari, and J. Prost, Phys. Rev. E 60, 2127 (1999); E. Gerritsma and P. Gaspard, Biophys. Rev. Lett. 5, 163 (2010); E. Muneyuki and K. Sekimoto, Phys. Rev. E 81, 011137 (2010); U. Seifert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 020601 (2011).
  6. M. Esposito and C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. E 82, 011143 (2010); K. Sekimoto, Stochastic Energetics (Springer, New York, 2010); U. Seifert, Eur. Phys. J. B 64, 423 (2008).
  7. C. Van den Broeck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 190602 (2005).
  8. F. Curzon and B. Ahlborn, Am. J. Phys. 43, 22 (1975).
  9. G. P. Harmer and D. Abbott, Fluctuations Noise Lett. 2, R71 (2002).
  10. J. M. R. Parrondo and B. J. de Cisneros, Appl. Phys. A 75, 179 (2002).

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation