Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Rapid Communication
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Phenomenology of aging in the Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation

Malte Henkel1, Jae Dong Noh2,3, and Michel Pleimling4

  • 1Groupe de Physique Statistique, Département de Physique de la Matière et des Matériaux, Institut Jean Lamour (CNRS UMR 7198), Université de Lorraine Nancy, B.P. 70239, F-54506 Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy Cedex, France
  • 2Department of Physics, University of Seoul, Seoul 130-743, Republic of Korea
  • 3School of Physics, Korea Institute for Advanced Study, Seoul 130-722, Republic of Korea
  • 4Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061-0435, USA

Phys. Rev. E 85, 030102(R) – Published 27 March, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.030102

Abstract

We study aging during surface growth processes described by the one-dimensional Kardar-Parisi-Zhang equation. Starting from a flat initial state, the systems undergo simple aging in both correlators and linear responses, and its dynamical scaling is characterized by the aging exponents a=1/3, b=2/3, λC=λR=1, and z=3/2. The form of the autoresponse scaling function is well described by the recently constructed logarithmic extension of local scale invariance.

Article Text

References (43)

  1. M. Kardar, G. Parisi, and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 889 (1986).
  2. A. L. Barabási and H. E. Stanley, Fractal Concepts in Surface Growth (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1995).
  3. J. Krug, in Scale Invariance, Interfaces and Nonequilibrium Dynamics, edited by A. McKane, M. Droz, J. Vannimenus, and D. Wolf, NATO Advanced Studies Institute, Series B, Vol. 344 (Plenum, New York, 1995), p. 1.
  4. T. Halpin-Healy and Y.-C. Zhang, Phys. Rep. 254, 215 (1995).
  5. T. Kriecherbauer and J. Krug, J. Phys. A 43, 403001 (2010).
  6. J. Krug, Adv. Phys. 46, 139 (1997).
  7. T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P11013.
  8. W. M. Tong and R. S. Williams, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 45, 401 (1994).
  9. M. T. Batchelor, R. V. Burne, B. I. Henry, and S. D. Watt, Physica A 282, 123 (2000).
  10. T. Sasamoto and H. Spohn, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230602 (2010).
  11. P. Calabrese and P. Le Doussal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 250603 (2011).
  12. K. A. Takeuchi, M. Sano, T. Sasamoto, and H. Spohn, Sci. Rep. 1, 34 (2011); K. A. Takeuchi and M. Sano, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 230601 (2010).
  13. L. F. Cugliandolo, in Slow Relaxations and Nonequilibrium Dynamics in Condensed Matter, edited by J. L. Barrat , Proceedings of the Les Houches Summer School of Theoretical Physics, LXXVII, 2002 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2003).
  14. M. Henkel and M. Pleimling, Nonequilibrium Phase Transitions, Vol. 2 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2010).
  15. T. Enss, M. Henkel, A. Picone, and U. Schollwöck, J. Phys. A 37, 10479 (2004).
  16. J. J. Ramasco, M. Henkel, M. A. Santos, and C. A. da Silva Santos, J. Phys. A 37, 10497 (2004).
  17. G. Odor, J. Stat. Mech. (2006) L11002.
  18. X. Durang, J.-Y. Fortin, and M. Henkel, J. Stat. Mech. (2011) P02030.
  19. F. Family and T. Vicsek, J. Phys. A 18, L75 (1985).
  20. S. F. Edwards and D. R. Wilkinson, Proc. R. Soc. London A 381, 17 (1982).
  21. D. E. Wolf and J. Villain, Europhys. Lett. 13, 389 (1990).
  22. A. Röthlein, F. Baumann, and M. Pleimling, Phys. Rev. E 74, 061604 (2006); 76, 019901(E) (2007).
  23. H. Kallabis and J. Krug, Europhys. Lett. 45, 20 (1999).
  24. G. L. Daquila and U. C. Täuber, Phys. Rev. E 83, 051107 (2011).
  25. S. Bustingorry, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P10002; S. Bustingorry, L. F. Cugliandolo, and J. L. Iguain, ibid. (2007) P09008.
  26. Y.-L. Chou and M. Pleimling, J. Stat. Mech. (2010) P08007.
  27. In the EW and MH universality classes, one has λC=λR=d. For the KPZ class λC=d is conjectured [23].
  28. T. J. Newman and M. R. Swift, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2261 (1997).
  29. J. M. Kim and J. M. Kosterlitz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 2289 (1989).
  30. M. Krech, Phys. Rev. E 55, 668 (1997).
  31. J. L. Iguain, S. Bustingorry, A. B. Kolton, and L. F. Cugliandolo, Phys. Rev. B 80, 094201 (2009).
  32. U. Deker and F. Haake, Phys. Rev. A 11, 2043 (1975); D. Forster, D. R. Nelson, and M. J. Stephen, ibid. 16, 732 (1977); E. Medina, T. Hwa, M. Kardar, and Y.-C. Zhang, ibid. 39, 3053 (1989).
  33. V. S. L’vov, V. V. Lebedev, M. Paton, and I. Procaccia, Nonlinearity 6, 25 (1993).
  34. E. Frey, U. C. Täuber, and T. Hwa, Phys. Rev. E 53, 4424 (1996).
  35. L. Canet, H. Chaté, B. Delamotte, and N. Wschebor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 150601 (2010).
  36. M. Henkel, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19, 065101 (2007).
  37. M. Henkel, J. Stat. Phys. 75, 1023 (1994).
  38. M. Henkel and F. Baumann, J. Stat. Mech. (2007) P07015.
  39. M. Henkel, T. Enss, and M. Pleimling, J. Phys. A 39, L589 (2006).
  40. V. Gurarie, Nucl. Phys. B 410, 535 (1993); M. R. Rahimi Tabar et al., ibid. 497, 555 (1997); M. R. Gaberdiel and H. G. Kausch, ibid. 538, 631 (1999); A. Hosseiny and S. Rouhani, J. Math. Phys. 51, 102303 (2010).
  41. At equilibrium, two-dimensional (2D) percolation is a known case of logarithmic conformal invariance [P. Mathieu and D. Ridout, Nucl. Phys. B 801, 268 (2008)].
  42. M. Henkel, e-print arXiv:1009.4139.
  43. H. S. Wio, Int. J. Bifurcation Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 19, 2813 (2009).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation