Export citation

Export citation

Choose format for download:

Download Citation
  • Access by Xinjiang University

Rejection-free Monte Carlo sampling for general potentials

E. A. J. F. Peters* and G. de With

  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Postbus 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands

  • *e.a.j.f.peters@tue.nl
  • g.deWith@tue.nl

Phys. Rev. E 85, 026703 – Published 15 February, 2012

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.85.026703

Abstract

A Monte Carlo method to sample the classical configurational canonical ensemble is introduced. In contrast to the Metropolis algorithm, where trial moves can be rejected, in this approach collisions take place. The implementation is event-driven; i.e., at scheduled times the collisions occur. A unique feature of the new method is that smooth potentials (instead of only step-wise changing ones) can be used. In addition to an event-driven approach, where all particles move simultaneously, we introduce a straight event-chain implementation. As proof of principle, a system of Lennard-Jones particles is simulated.

Article Text

References (16)

  1. K. Binder and A. Baumgärtner, Applications of the Monte Carlo Method in Statistical Physics, 2nd ed. (Springer-Verlag, Berlin/New York, 1987).
  2. M. P. Allen and D. J. Tildesley, Computer Simulation of Liquids (Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
  3. D. Frenkel and B. Smit, Understanding Molecular Simulation: From Algorithms to Applications, 2nd ed. (Academic Press, San Diego, 2002).
  4. D. C. Rapaport, The Art of Molecular Dynamics Simulation, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York, 2004).
  5. W. Krauth, Statistical Mechanics: Algorithms and Computations (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2006).
  6. B. J. Alder and T. E. Wainwright, J. Comput. Phys. 31, 459 (1959).
  7. G. A. Chapela, S. E. Martinezcasas, and J. Alejandre, Mol. Phys. 53, 139 (1984).
  8. E. P. Bernard, W. Krauth, and D. B. Wilson, Phys. Rev. E 80, 056704 (2009).
  9. E. P. Bernard and W. Krauth, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 155704 (2011).
  10. K. A. Fichthorn and W. H. Weinberg, J. Comput. Phys. 95, 1090 (1991).
  11. A. B. Bortz, M. H. Kalos, and J. L. Lebowitz, J. Comput. Phys. 17, 10 (1975).
  12. M. L. Guerra, M. A. Novotny, H. Watanabe, and N. Ito, Phys. Rev. E 79, 026706 (2009).
  13. D. C. Rapaport, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 178, 5 (2009).
  14. B. Smit, J. Comput. Phys. 96, 8639 (1992).
  15. S. Miller and S. Luding, J. Comput. Phys. 193, 306 (2004).
  16. M. N. Bannerman, R. Sargant, and L. Lue, J. Comput. Chem. 32, 3329 (2011).

Outline

Information

Sign In to Your Journals Account

Filter

Filter

Article Lookup

Enter a citation